| Revision as of 16:42, 5 November 2013 editKeysanger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers10,876 edits →WikiCup 2014← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:12, 5 November 2013 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,256 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| you have been incriminated in ]. --Best regards, '''KS''' (]) 16:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC) | you have been incriminated in ]. --Best regards, '''KS''' (]) 16:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == November 2013 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> To enforce an ] decision, and for , ]you have been ''']''' from editing for '''1 month'''. You are welcome to ] once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Revision as of 19:12, 5 November 2013
Please leave a message. I'll reply here or in your talk page.
| This is MarshalN20's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
| Note: A bot archives contents of this page. No recent posts means no messages will be displayed below. Older messages are still readable in the archives (above). New messages may be added here. If you post a message here, I will reply on your talk page. |
GOCE Blitz wrap-up; join us for the November drive
Guild of Copy Editors October Blitz wrap-up
Participation: Out of eleven people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we copy edited 42 articles from WikiProject Film's backlog, reducing it by a net of 34 articles. Hope to see you at the November drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest and Torchiest, Baffle gab1978 and Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the November drive!To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC) |
WP:FT topic question
Hello, you recently commented on the Featured Topic nomination Misplaced Pages:Featured topic candidates/Battlecruisers of the World/archive1. There have been three different versions of the topic box proposed - could you take a look at them and offer an opinion as to which is best? Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 18:38, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Falkland Islands
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Falkland Islands you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Falkland Islands
The article Falkland Islands you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Falkland Islands for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
WikiCup 2014
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©ontributions 01:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
Hi MarshalN20,
you have been incriminated in Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. --Best regards, KS (wat?) 16:42, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your topic ban,
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.