Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User conduct/Archive: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment | User conduct Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:40, 6 November 2013 editLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators763,091 edits new key for Category:Misplaced Pages requests archive: "Request for comment user conduct" using HotCat← Previous edit Revision as of 23:52, 6 November 2013 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators763,091 edits Put cases in chronological orderNext edit →
Line 35: Line 35:
| No conclusive outcomes, Misplaced Pages is not a battleground, edit warring is unconstructive | No conclusive outcomes, Misplaced Pages is not a battleground, edit warring is unconstructive
|- |-
|] | ]
|22 June 2013 | 22 June 2013
|Uncivil behavior, edit warring, and sock puppetry, mostly related to Islam topics | Uncivil behavior, edit warring, and sock puppetry, mostly related to Islam topics
|Discussion went stale after a few weeks, with Baboon43 refusing to participate, before the issue was taken to AN, resulting in an indefinite block. | Discussion went stale after a few weeks, with Baboon43 refusing to participate, before the issue was taken to AN, resulting in an indefinite block.
|-
|]
|30 April 2013
|Problematic behaviour around AfDs and notabilty issues related to Dungeons & Dragons
|There was consensus that Folken's approach needs to change. The closing admin suggested that he agree to a voluntary topic ban regarding deletion issues in the problem area.
|-
|]
|29 March 2013
|Problematic creation of navboxes and other content
|some progress, later apparenrlty reversed. a proposal for a formal topic ban is anticipated
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 54: Line 44:
| Talk page and behavioral issues | Talk page and behavioral issues
| Withdrawn after discussion on talk page of RfC/U | Withdrawn after discussion on talk page of RfC/U
|-
| ]
| 30 April 2013
| Problematic behaviour around AfDs and notabilty issues related to Dungeons & Dragons
| There was consensus that Folken's approach needs to change. The closing admin suggested that he agree to a voluntary topic ban regarding deletion issues in the problem area.
|-
| ]
| 29 March 2013
| Problematic creation of navboxes and other content
| Some progress, later apparenrlty reversed. a proposal for a formal topic ban is anticipated
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 59: Line 59:
| To discuss whether Will should be allowed back to edit | To discuss whether Will should be allowed back to edit
| No consensus to overturn Arbcom decision | No consensus to overturn Arbcom decision
|-
| ]
| 20 January 2013
| Tendentious editing/POV issues
| All participants other than the certifiers felt that this dispute was about content, not conduct
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 64: Line 69:
| Soapboxing, personal attacks, unreliable sources, canvassing | Soapboxing, personal attacks, unreliable sources, canvassing
| Closed due to inactivity | Closed due to inactivity
|-
|]
|20 January 2013
|Tendentious editing/POV issues
|All participants other than the certifiers felt that this dispute was about content, not conduct
|- |-
|} |}
Line 104: Line 104:
| ] | ]
| 12 December 2012 | 12 December 2012
| excessive editing of the category namespace | Excessive editing of the category namespace
| ], ] | ], ]
| No users endorsed the certifier's position, only statements critical of the certifiers and the process received significant support. | No users endorsed the certifier's position, only statements critical of the certifiers and the process received significant support.
|- |-
| ]
| 3 December 2012
| Lack of compliance with verifiability and sourcing policies and guidelines, and original research.
| ], ]
| Unanimous consensus that the problems identified in the RfC exist. Paul Bedson was indefinitely blocked.
|- |-
| ] | ]
| 21 November 2012 | 3 December 2012
| Accountability for Administrative Actions
| Civility, misuse of edit summaries, sopaboxing, biting the newcomers
| ], ] | ], ]
| Several highly endorsed viewpoints. Referred to Arbitration.
| No consensus, closing admin suggested taking larger issues to arbitration
|-
| ]
| 30 November 2012
| Concerns strongly asserted opinions about en dashes and the Manual of Style, and allegations of disruption
| ], ]
| Taken to ] for action (; ).
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 121: Line 132:
| Closed due to inactivity; Bluerim's last edit was two months before closure | Closed due to inactivity; Bluerim's last edit was two months before closure
|- |-
| ] | ]
| 01 November 2012 | 21 November 2012
| Incivility, ownership, Good articles, lack of edit summaries, ] article | Civility, misuse of edit summaries, sopaboxing, biting the newcomers
| ], ] | ], ]
| No consensus, closing admin suggested taking larger issues to arbitration
| Topic ban from ]
|-
| ]
| 30 November 2012
| Concerns strongly asserted opinions about en dashes and the Manual of Style, and allegations of disruption
| ], ]
| Taken to ] for action (; ).
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 145: Line 150:
| Delisted due to inactivity | Delisted due to inactivity
|- |-
| ] | ]
| 3 December 2012 | 01 November 2012
| Incivility, ownership, Good articles, lack of edit summaries, ] article
| Lack of compliance with verifiability and sourcing policies and guidelines, and original research.
| ], ] | ], ]
| Topic ban from ]
| Unanimous consensus that the problems identified in the RfC exist. Paul Bedson was indefinitely blocked.
|-
| ]
| 3 December 2012
| Accountability for Administrative Actions
| ], ]
| Several highly endorsed viewpoints. Referred to Arbitration.
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 161: Line 160:
| Civility, Use of offensive language | Civility, Use of offensive language
| ], ] | ], ]
| no consensus achieved. | No consensus achieved.
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 167: Line 166:
| Personal attacks on several users | Personal attacks on several users
| ], ] | ], ]
| no consensus due achieved. | No consensus due achieved.
|-
| ]
| 24 August 2012
| Disruptive interactions at talk pages
| ], ]
| User indef blocked for sockpuppetry
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 173: Line 178:
| Copyright verification, disruption | Copyright verification, disruption
| ], ] | ], ]
| no consensus due to lack of community input | No consensus due to lack of community input
|- |-
| ] | ]
| 24 August 2012 | 5 August 2012
| Edit warring and personal attack
| Disruptive interactions at talk pages
| ], ] | ], ]
| Agreement. One month break followed by 3 month BLP restriction and 6 month 1RR and civility parole
| User indef blocked for sockpuppetry
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 192: Line 197:
| ], ] | ], ]
| No consensus achieved | No consensus achieved
|-
| ]
| 5 August 2012
| Edit warring and personal attack
| ], ]
| Agreement. One month break followed by 3 month BLP restriction and 6 month 1RR and civility parole
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 204: Line 203:
| ] | ]
| No consensus achieved. | No consensus achieved.
|-
| ]
| 20 March 2012
| Biased editing
| ], ]
| Delisted due to inactivity
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 210: Line 215:
| ], ] | ], ]
| User offered to be more in line with community consensus | User offered to be more in line with community consensus
|-
| ]
| 20 March 2012
| Biased editing
| ], ]
| Delisted due to inactivity
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 222: Line 221:
| ], ] | ], ]
| Closed due to editor indef blocked | Closed due to editor indef blocked
|-
| ]
| 10 January 2012
| Potential editing against consensus and lack of discussion on talk pages.
| ], ]
| Closed after expiring without any response from Kolins
|- |-
| ] | ]
Line 237: Line 230:
| ] | ]
| 14 January 2012 | 14 January 2012
| alleged persistently uncivil edit summaries | Alleged persistently uncivil edit summaries
| ], ] | ], ]
| DocKino has acknowledged that editing Misplaced Pages with frustration and anger is not conductive to a collaborative editing environment and will endeavor to refrain from said commentary in the future. | DocKino has acknowledged that editing Misplaced Pages with frustration and anger is not conductive to a collaborative editing environment and will endeavor to refrain from said commentary in the future.
|- |-
| ]
| 10 January 2012
| Potential editing against consensus and lack of discussion on talk pages.
| ], ]
| Closed after expiring without any response from Kolins
|- |-
|} |}

Revision as of 23:52, 6 November 2013

Archiving icon
Archives

This page is for archiving user conduct disputes listed on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Archived disputes should not be added to. Disputes should be archived under any of the following circumstances:

  1. If no additional complaints are registered for an extended period of time, and the dispute appears to have stopped.
  2. The parties to the dispute agree.
  3. The dispute proceeds to another method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration.

If the dispute is handled in mediation or arbitration, please make a note of where the dispute resolution process continued.

Archived disputes

  • Newer entries towards the top
  • This page only displays user RFCs from the most recent year and the current year, older discussions can be found in the archives, a search box is provided above
  • As of March 25, 2013, the names of the certifiers are no longer a required field. You can find this information easily by clicking the link to the RFC itself.
Name Start date Description Notes
Joefromrandb 15 August 2013 Long-term incivility, personal attacks, and edit-warring No conclusive outcomes, Misplaced Pages is not a battleground, edit warring is unconstructive
Baboon43 22 June 2013 Uncivil behavior, edit warring, and sock puppetry, mostly related to Islam topics Discussion went stale after a few weeks, with Baboon43 refusing to participate, before the issue was taken to AN, resulting in an indefinite block.
Arzel 13 May 2013 Talk page and behavioral issues Withdrawn after discussion on talk page of RfC/U
Folken de Fanel 30 April 2013 Problematic behaviour around AfDs and notabilty issues related to Dungeons & Dragons There was consensus that Folken's approach needs to change. The closing admin suggested that he agree to a voluntary topic ban regarding deletion issues in the problem area.
Jax 0677 29 March 2013 Problematic creation of navboxes and other content Some progress, later apparenrlty reversed. a proposal for a formal topic ban is anticipated
Will Beback 23 March 2013 To discuss whether Will should be allowed back to edit No consensus to overturn Arbcom decision
CartoonDiablo 20 January 2013 Tendentious editing/POV issues All participants other than the certifiers felt that this dispute was about content, not conduct
Apostle12 21 December 2012 Soapboxing, personal attacks, unreliable sources, canvassing Closed due to inactivity


Name Start date Description First two certifiers Notes
Cantaloupe2 31 January 2013 Concerns about civility, battlegrounding, and related conduct issues AndrewDressel, CorporateM Serious and valid problems with Cantaloupe2's conduct exist. The matter might be taken up by ArbCom.
Epeefleche 15 January 2013 Removal of unsourced content from articles Danjel, Graham87 Epeefleche is broadly correct to remove unsourced content, and Danjel has often acted wrongly in restoring unsourced content.
Also, Danjel's conduct is widely seen as hounding.
Morriswa 29 December 2012 Mass edits at high speed, improper use of rollback, deficient listening skills Rschen7754, Imzadi1979 Broad consensus that Morriswa's work was indeed problematic, a problem now recognized by Morriswa. Good will and good faith all around, fortunately.
Johnpacklambert 12 December 2012 Excessive editing of the category namespace Purplebackpack89, Ephebi No users endorsed the certifier's position, only statements critical of the certifiers and the process received significant support.
Paul Bedson 3 December 2012 Lack of compliance with verifiability and sourcing policies and guidelines, and original research. Mike Christie, Ealdgyth Unanimous consensus that the problems identified in the RfC exist. Paul Bedson was indefinitely blocked.
SchuminWeb 3 December 2012 Accountability for Administrative Actions Ironholds, GiantSnowman Several highly endorsed viewpoints. Referred to Arbitration.
Apteva 30 November 2012 Concerns strongly asserted opinions about en dashes and the Manual of Style, and allegations of disruption Dicklyon, SMcCandlish Taken to WP:AN for action (diff; closing summary).
Bluerim 29 November 2012 Civility, edit warring, consensus Sjones23, JDC808 Closed due to inactivity; Bluerim's last edit was two months before closure
Rhode Island Red 2 21 November 2012 Civility, misuse of edit summaries, sopaboxing, biting the newcomers GeorgeLouis, Collect No consensus, closing admin suggested taking larger issues to arbitration
Darkstar1st 19 November 2012‎ To determine whether editor fails to "get the point" in discussions about article content. R-41, Kierzek Closed a second time. RfC/U of limited scope concluded there were behavioral problems.
RidjalA 3 November 2012 Concerns regarding possible personal attacks, Possible ownership, and disruptive behavior as a result of bias against the LDM church. Fordx12, Ajaxfiore Delisted due to inactivity
Niemti 01 November 2012 Incivility, ownership, Good articles, lack of edit summaries, Anita Sarkeesian article Bridies, GamerPro64 Topic ban from Anita Sarkeesian at ANI
HiLo48 30 October 2012 Civility, Use of offensive language Surturz, Skyring No consensus achieved.
Mmarque 19 October 2012 Personal attacks on several users Joel B. Lewis, ArthurPSmith No consensus due achieved.
Kurmaa 24 August 2012 Disruptive interactions at talk pages Aeusoes1, Chaipau User indef blocked for sockpuppetry
Wikiwatcher1 6 August 2012 Copyright verification, disruption Moonriddengirl, We hope No consensus due to lack of community input
Youreallycan 5 August 2012 Edit warring and personal attack Prioryman, Magog the Ogre Agreement. One month break followed by 3 month BLP restriction and 6 month 1RR and civility parole
Bittergrey 28 July 2012 Battleground mentality, COI/activism, off-wiki harassment of an editor WLU, Saedon Suspended due to Bittergrey being blocked for disruption on 30 July 2012
Offender9000 25 June 2012 Outing, violations of neutrality/weight and battleground-like conduct Daveosaurus, Stuartyeates No consensus achieved
Agent00f 12 May 2012 Talk page disruption Hasteur No consensus achieved.
Vision Thing 20 March 2012 Biased editing Hipocrite, Lawrencekhoo Delisted due to inactivity
TenPoundHammer 7 March 2012 Article deletion nominations Andy Dingley, Ruud Koot User offered to be more in line with community consensus
TBrandley 29 February 2012 Excessive article creation, disruption Logical Cowboy, JayJay Closed due to editor indef blocked
Fæ 25 January 2012 Various Delicious carbuncle, Aaron Brenneman No consensus was reached
DocKino 14 January 2012 Alleged persistently uncivil edit summaries Mmyers1976, Dolphin DocKino has acknowledged that editing Misplaced Pages with frustration and anger is not conductive to a collaborative editing environment and will endeavor to refrain from said commentary in the future.
Kolins 10 January 2012 Potential editing against consensus and lack of discussion on talk pages. GiantSnowman, Drmies Closed after expiring without any response from Kolins
Categories: