Misplaced Pages

User talk:Daki122: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:53, 17 November 2013 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,206 edits November 2013: There may still be time← Previous edit Revision as of 16:07, 17 November 2013 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,206 edits Edit warring at Template:Syrian civil war detailed map: new sectionNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
As you have continued reverting after being warned that you broke the 1-revert restriction, I have to the ]. ~~ ] (]) 03:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC) As you have continued reverting after being warned that you broke the 1-revert restriction, I have to the ]. ~~ ] (]) 03:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
:Daki122, if you respond at ] and promise to wait for consensus there may still be time to avoid a block. ] (]) 05:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC) :Daki122, if you respond at ] and promise to wait for consensus there may still be time to avoid a block. ] (]) 05:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

== Edit warring at ] ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
The complete report of this case is at ]. A ] restriction has been previously imposed on this article by the community per ]. Thank you, ] (]) 16:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:07, 17 November 2013

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

1 revert rule

Daki you broke the one revert rule. Please self revert, otherwise it could lead to being temporarily banned. Also you criticize me for using youtube, yet you used wikipedia as source which is not allowed either. Just saying. Sopher99 (talk) 19:58, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Here is the source showing regime forces pulled out of Kirnzaz. Now please self revert.

http://syrianewsdesk.com/en/news/hama-al-sheikh-hadeid-witnesses-massacre

And please stop acting as if I am some evil conspirator. Sopher99 (talk) 20:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

You think it might have been reported by SOHR which is a pro opp source and they shell the town every day.

Syrian regime forces, backed by members of the regime-loyalist Shabbiha militia, carried out executions targeting local civilians in the village of Al-Sheikh Hadeid, after pulling out of the nearby town of Karnaz in the Hama countryside. Maher Hamwi, a local field activist, said regime forces used knives and shot civilians randomly. They also buried the bodies immediately "to prevent activists from documenting them", according to Hamwi. Al-Sheikh Hadeid is a small village near the town of Karnaz, northwest of the city of Hama. The village has been subject to violent shelling by regime forces on daily basis, driving most of its inhabitants out of it to seek refuge in nearby areas.

Also no specified as did the rebels enter the town or not as Army many times leaves the defense of the town on pro-regime militias while Army units pull out to be redeployed to other sectors.Source does not give specification who controls the town so it can not be used(again I will quote my self "There is no mentioning of rebels taking or entering the town")

Daki122 (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

As you have continued reverting after being warned that you broke the 1-revert restriction, I have reported you to the Administrators' noticeboard for edit-warring. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 03:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Daki122, if you respond at WP:AN3#User:Daki122 reported by User:Lothar von Richthofen (Result: ) and promise to wait for consensus there may still be time to avoid a block. EdJohnston (talk) 05:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring at Template:Syrian civil war detailed map

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Template:Syrian civil war detailed map. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Daki122 reported by User:Lothar von Richthofen (Result: 24 hours). A WP:1RR restriction has been previously imposed on this article by the community per WP:SCWGS. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)