| Revision as of 18:22, 12 June 2006 editStanley011 (talk | contribs)3,270 edits First deletion reason | Revision as of 18:45, 12 June 2006 edit undoHateless (talk | contribs)10,095 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| The page is inherently unencyclopedic, containing incidents that can easily be incorporated into the Bill O'Reilly main page. ] 18:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | The page is inherently unencyclopedic, containing incidents that can easily be incorporated into the Bill O'Reilly main page. ] 18:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''', at 51k and with 20 or so footnotes, the article can NOT be easily incorporated into the main article. The article seems well-sourced but there are NPOV issues which warrant editing, and perhaps a few sections should be removed, but I don't see anything non-encyclopedic about it, esp. for a non-paper encyclopedia like WP is. ] 18:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:45, 12 June 2006
Bill O'Reilly controversies
The page is inherently unencyclopedic, containing incidents that can easily be incorporated into the Bill O'Reilly main page. Stanley011 18:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, at 51k and with 20 or so footnotes, the article can NOT be easily incorporated into the main article. The article seems well-sourced but there are NPOV issues which warrant editing, and perhaps a few sections should be removed, but I don't see anything non-encyclopedic about it, esp. for a non-paper encyclopedia like WP is. hateless 18:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)