| Revision as of 06:19, 20 November 2013 editBon courage (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,166 editsm tidy← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:43, 20 November 2013 edit undoBon courage (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users66,166 edits Nominated for deletion; see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/German Acupuncture Trials. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled --> | |||
| {{Article for deletion/dated|page=German Acupuncture Trials|timestamp=20131120064327|year=2013|month=November|day=20|substed=yes|help=off}} | |||
| <!-- For administrator use only: {{Old AfD multi|page=German Acupuncture Trials|date=20 November 2013|result='''keep'''}} --> | |||
| <!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --> | |||
| The '''German Acupuncture Trials''' ('''GERAC''') were a series of ] trials set up in 2001 and published in 2006, that found no significant difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture.<ref name="Howick2011">{{cite book|author=Jeremy H. Howick|title=The Philosophy of Evidence-based Medicine|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=O8djbHBva5IC&pg=PA92|date=23 February 2011|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4443-4266-6|page=92}}</ref> | The '''German Acupuncture Trials''' ('''GERAC''') were a series of ] trials set up in 2001 and published in 2006, that found no significant difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture.<ref name="Howick2011">{{cite book|author=Jeremy H. Howick|title=The Philosophy of Evidence-based Medicine|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=O8djbHBva5IC&pg=PA92|date=23 February 2011|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4443-4266-6|page=92}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 06:43, 20 November 2013
| An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion. Find sources: "German acupuncture trials" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FGerman+Acupuncture+Trials%5D%5DAFD |
The German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) were a series of acupuncture trials set up in 2001 and published in 2006, that found no significant difference between acupuncture and sham acupuncture.
In later years, Edzard Ernst noted that the studies had attracted criticism for not controlling the risk of patient de-blinding, and said that they " to conclusively answer the question whether acupuncture helps patients through a specific or a nonspecific effect".
References
- Jeremy H. Howick (23 February 2011). The Philosophy of Evidence-based Medicine. John Wiley & Sons. p. 92. ISBN 978-1-4443-4266-6.
- Ernst, E. (2006). "Acupuncture - a critical analysis". Journal of Internal Medicine. 259 (2): 125–37. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01584.x. PMID 16420542.
- Wettig, D (2005). "Die GERAC-Gonarthrose-Studie". Der Schmerz. 19 (4): 330–1, author reply 331–2. doi:10.1007/s00482-005-0404-0. PMID 16145742.
External links
 | This article about alternative medicine is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |