Misplaced Pages

Southern Poverty Law Center: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:02, 6 September 2004 view source65.173.120.103 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:59, 12 September 2004 view source 65.173.120.103 (talk) grammar updates and rebalancing of material, deleted repeat NPOV provisionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{NPOV}}
{{NPOV}} ''See this article's ] page to learn more.''


The '''Southern Poverty Law Center''' is based in ], in the ] of the ]. It was started in ] by ] and ] as a ] law firm. It is known for its tolerance education programs, its legal victories against ] groups, its tracking of hate groups, and its sponsorship of the ]-designed ]. The Center publishes an in-depth analysis of ] and ] crimes in the United States in the quarterly Intelligence Report. The '''Southern Poverty Law Center''' (SPLC) is based in ], in the ] of the ]. It was started in ] by ] and ] as a ] law firm. It is known for its tolerance education programs, its legal victories against ] groups, its tracking of hate groups, and its sponsorship of the ]-designed ]. The Center publishes an in-depth analysis of ] and ] crimes in the United States in the quarterly ].


==History == ==History ==
Line 7: Line 7:


== Controversy == == Controversy ==
Because of its work, it is not surprising that the SPLC is controversial. Some criticisms have focused on its fundraising practices. Critics cite a ] ] article that asserts that the Southern Poverty Law Center was "the nation's richest civil rights organization" with $68 million in ]. Critics also cite an a ] article in the Fairfax (]) Journal containing an assertiion that 89 percent of income was spent on fundraising and administrative costs. Because of its work, it is not surprising that the SPLC is controversial. Some criticisms have focused on its fundraising practices. Critics cite a ] ] article that asserts that the Southern Poverty Law Center is "the nation's richest civil rights organization" with $68 million in ] at the time. Critics also cite an a ] article in the Fairfax (]) Journal containing an assertiion that 89 percent of income was spent on fundraising and administrative costs.


In 1994 the Montgomery Advertiser published an investigative series revealing financial mismanagement, poor management practices, misleading fundraising, and institutionalized racism at the Center. Former black employees asserted that the Center was run "like a plantation" and complained of discrimination by white supervisors. The Center threatened legal action against the newspaper during the publication of the series, and lobbied against its consideration for journalism awards. However, the investigative series was a finalist for a 1995 Pulitzer Prize. In 1994 ] published an investigative series revealing alleged financial mismanagement, poor management practices, misleading fundraising, and institutionalized racism at the Center. Former black employees asserted that the Center was run like "a ]" and complained of discrimination by white supervisors. The Center threatened legal action against the newspaper during the publication of the series, and lobbied against its consideration for journalism awards. However, the investigative series was a finalist for a ] ].


The Center has asserted that these are attempts to smear its reputation, and dismisses these claims as being brought forward by 'extremist' groups.
== External links ==

== External links from the SPLC ==
* *
* *
Line 17: Line 19:
== External links containing criticisms of SPLC == == External links containing criticisms of SPLC ==
* - A critical look at the SPLC and its founder from Harper's Magazine, republished in the Free Republic * - A critical look at the SPLC and its founder from Harper's Magazine, republished in the Free Republic
*- Panel discussion with the investigative reporter who covered the SPLC for the Montgomery Advertiser *- Panel discussion with the investigative reporter/editor who helped covered the SPLC for The Montgomery Advertiser

Revision as of 15:59, 12 September 2004

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is based in Montgomery, Alabama, in the South of the US. It was started in 1971 by Morris Dees and Joe Levin as a civil rights law firm. It is known for its tolerance education programs, its legal victories against white supremacist groups, its tracking of hate groups, and its sponsorship of the Maya Lin-designed Civil Rights Memorial. The Center publishes an in-depth analysis of political extremism and bias crimes in the United States in the quarterly Intelligence Report.

History

The first case the Center took on forced the local YMCA to racially integrate their athletic offerings. In 1979 the Center brought its first case against the Klu Klux Klan. This was the first of many cases against the Klan. In 1983, the Klan responded by burning down the Center's offices. Several other attempts to bomb the center and kill Morris Dees have been thwarted.

Controversy

Because of its work, it is not surprising that the SPLC is controversial. Some criticisms have focused on its fundraising practices. Critics cite a 1996 USA Today article that asserts that the Southern Poverty Law Center is "the nation's richest civil rights organization" with $68 million in assets at the time. Critics also cite an a 2003 article in the Fairfax (VA) Journal containing an assertiion that 89 percent of income was spent on fundraising and administrative costs.

In 1994 The Montgomery Advertiser published an investigative series revealing alleged financial mismanagement, poor management practices, misleading fundraising, and institutionalized racism at the Center. Former black employees asserted that the Center was run like "a plantation" and complained of discrimination by white supervisors. The Center threatened legal action against the newspaper during the publication of the series, and lobbied against its consideration for journalism awards. However, the investigative series was a finalist for a 1995 Pulitzer Prize.

The Center has asserted that these are attempts to smear its reputation, and dismisses these claims as being brought forward by 'extremist' groups.

External links from the SPLC

External links containing criticisms of SPLC