User talk:Socafan: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 10:10, 15 June 2006 editSocafan (talk \| contribs)1,024 edits →Please apologize for revealing users' location without their approval ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:13, 15 June 2006 edit undoSocafan (talk \| contribs)1,024 edits →Unblock request Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	==Unblock request==		==Unblock request==
	unblock\|I have not even heard of the user someone claims I am a sockpuppet of, I cannot find entries at checkuser for them, there is not a single piece of evidence provided for the claim, I cannot find a single article I edited among those they seem to have focussed on so I wonder how even the suspicion could arise, and the only thing at the checkuser page about me is an "inconclusive" case with someone different from the two. "Inconclusive" based on the fact that two guys from two European countries are likely identical. Sorry for cynism.		{{unblock\|I have not even heard of the user someone claims I am a sockpuppet of, I cannot find entries at checkuser for them, there is not a single piece of evidence provided for the claim, I cannot find a single article I edited among those they seem to have focussed on so I wonder how even the suspicion could arise, and the only thing at the checkuser page about me is an "inconclusive" case with someone different from the two. "Inconclusive" based on the fact that two guys from two European countries are likely identical. Sorry for cynism.}}
	: You need to contact the blocking admin. --]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">]</font>)</sup> 06:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)		: You need to contact the blocking admin. --]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">]</font>)</sup> 06:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
			::How am I supposed to contact him if he blocks me? Furthermore, I do not trust him and think other admins should handle this case. He blocked without any basis, apparently as he tries to censor me because he disagrees with me in the case of another user whose original block was unfair: ]. ] 10:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

	==]==		==]==

Revision as of 10:13, 15 June 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Socafan, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

You may also be interested in the Misplaced Pages:Caribbean Wikipedians' notice board. Guettarda 18:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I think that was when I was a noob in regards to userfying stuff. The original page was a random page created by the user and it appeared to be user page stuff. Also, it was late at night and I am sorry if it disturbed you. If there is anything I can do leave a message, Yanksox 18:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

re: block

As I said on AN/I, if he will just promise to stop evading the block, I will reduce it back to a week. So far he hasn't contacted me. I think my offer is reasonable, and as someone else pointed out on his talk, he can open an RFC against me or anyone else after the week is up. He was causing a lot of disruption before and especially after his block, so I think he needs some time to cool off. Of course if he said he'd stop the disruption and I thought he was being serious, I'd unblock him entirely. But again, he hasn't contacted me. --W.marsh 01:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

He was unappologetically evading a block and causing disruption. There's simply no excuse for that. If he's not mature enough to realize that, I'm sorry, but there's nothing I can do about it. I think I'm being reasonable. --W.marsh 02:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

That's fine, and in fact, it's all I'm asking for... if he says he will stop evading the block, I will take it back down to the 1 week. Anything beyond that he'll need to talk to the admin who gave the 1 week block, not me. --W.marsh 02:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Socafan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not even heard of the user someone claims I am a sockpuppet of, I cannot find entries at checkuser for them, there is not a single piece of evidence provided for the claim, I cannot find a single article I edited among those they seem to have focussed on so I wonder how even the suspicion could arise, and the only thing at the checkuser page about me is an "inconclusive" case with someone different from the two. "Inconclusive" based on the fact that two guys from two European countries are likely identical. Sorry for cynism.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not even heard of the user someone claims I am a sockpuppet of, I cannot find entries at checkuser for them, there is not a single piece of evidence provided for the claim, I cannot find a single article I edited among those they seem to have focussed on so I wonder how even the suspicion could arise, and the only thing at the checkuser page about me is an "inconclusive" case with someone different from the two. "Inconclusive" based on the fact that two guys from two European countries are likely identical. Sorry for cynism. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not even heard of the user someone claims I am a sockpuppet of, I cannot find entries at checkuser for them, there is not a single piece of evidence provided for the claim, I cannot find a single article I edited among those they seem to have focussed on so I wonder how even the suspicion could arise, and the only thing at the checkuser page about me is an "inconclusive" case with someone different from the two. "Inconclusive" based on the fact that two guys from two European countries are likely identical. Sorry for cynism. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not even heard of the user someone claims I am a sockpuppet of, I cannot find entries at checkuser for them, there is not a single piece of evidence provided for the claim, I cannot find a single article I edited among those they seem to have focussed on so I wonder how even the suspicion could arise, and the only thing at the checkuser page about me is an "inconclusive" case with someone different from the two. "Inconclusive" based on the fact that two guys from two European countries are likely identical. Sorry for cynism. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You need to contact the blocking admin. --pgk 06:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

How am I supposed to contact him if he blocks me? Furthermore, I do not trust him and think other admins should handle this case. He blocked without any basis, apparently as he tries to censor me because he disagrees with me in the case of another user whose original block was unfair: Dabljuh. Socafan 10:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

As the admin who blocked me removed the source from the article for the number of signatories , here is a link to a source that can be accessed without registration: Currently the Rome Statute of the ICC has 139 Signatories and 100 Ratifications. It also shows that the United States were indeed not removed from the list of signatories as written in the article with a tag for "citation needed". Socafan 00:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Please apologize for revealing users' location without their approval

and promise not to ever do this again. Socafan 23:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

You apparently have no idea what you're talking about. The Foundation's privacy policy allows information on the general location of an individual to be released; saying "He's coming from Germany" or "He's editing from Switzerland" is perfectly within policy. I suggest that the next time you call someone out, you get your facts straight before you make a total fool of yourself. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 02:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

There was absolutely no need to infringe on other users' privacy. Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases.Socafan 10:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock