| Revision as of 00:15, 9 January 2014 editHans Adler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,943 edits →Time to smoke the peace pipe?: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:15, 9 January 2014 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,036 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Hans Adler/Archive 7) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ] I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.<br/>] I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.<br/>] I do not fancy non-consensual ]. | ] I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.<br/>] I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.<br/>] I do not fancy non-consensual ]. | ||
| == Statistics, articles géolocalisés == | |||
| Bonjour Hans Alder, | |||
| Pourrais-tu s'il te plaît me dire si mon texte suivant est compréhensible ? | |||
| <hr /> | |||
| Hi, | |||
| As in Misplaced Pages in French, I would like change {{t|Coord/display/inline,title}} and {{t|Coord/display/title}}. | |||
| I would like add | |||
| <tt><pre>{{#ifeq: {{NAMESPACE}}| {{ns:0}}|]}}</pre></tt>. | |||
| In the ], we can know the geolocalisated article number, as in ]. | |||
| <hr /> | |||
| Merci par avance pour ta réponse | |||
| --] (]) 22:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Je crois que c'est plus ou moins compréhensible (plus pour ceux qui connaissent le contexte, moins pour ceux qui l'ignorent, comme moi), mais j'ai essayé de l'améliorer : | |||
| <hr /> | |||
| As in the French Misplaced Pages, I would like to change {{t|Coord/display/inline,title}} and {{t|Coord/display/title}}. | |||
| I would like to add | |||
| <tt><pre>{{#ifeq: {{NAMESPACE}}| {{ns:0}}|]}}</pre></tt>. | |||
| Then in ], we can see the number of geolocated articles, as in ]. | |||
| <hr /> | |||
| :(D'ailleurs, comme la Wikipédia anglaise est très active, en général on n'emploie pas de salutations ici. C'est considéré normal et pas du tout impoli de les omettre.) ] 17:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Merci pour ces corrections et ces ajouts ! Sans cela, je pense qu'on ne m'aurait pas compris. | |||
| ::Je note, on dit "geolocated". J'avais essayé de trouver la traduction dans plusieurs dictionnaires, mais je n'avais pas réussi ! | |||
| ::J'ai placé ma demande sur la page suivante : ], c'est la page de discussion de tous les modèles {{tl|coord}}. | |||
| ::Du coup si j'ai bien compris, j'attends 7 jours, et je place {{tl|edit protected}} sur la PDD ? Je vois que le fonctionnement de Wikipédia en anglais est vraiment différent de Wikipédia en français. | |||
| ::Amicalement | |||
| ::--] (]) 15:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Je vois qu'il ya déjà une discussion très active avec des éditeurs plus compétents que moi. | |||
| :::Pour les traductions de termes techniques, j'ai souvent un bon succès avec Wikipédia. Par exemple, l'article ] indique l'article ] comme son équivalent anglais. ] 07:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::En tout cas, merci pour ton aide ! Bonne continuation --] (]) 09:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion notice == | |||
| You participated in the discussion at ] so I thought you might want to comment at ].--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 15:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Does this interest you at all? == | == Does this interest you at all? == | ||
Revision as of 03:15, 9 January 2014
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
In the near future I may not read my talk page as frequently and reliably as I used to do. For urgent or important matters, it may be better to use email.
I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.
I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.
I do not fancy non-consensual templated "WikiLove".
Does this interest you at all?
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/English_Wikipedia_readership_survey_2013 --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 02:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Requesting your opinion on a photo
Hi. We really need your opinion on which of these photos would make the best Infobox portrait for the Rick Remender article. Could you please offer your opinion in that discussion? The most recent subsection of that discussion is here, so you can just chime in there if you don't want to read the whole thread. I really appreciate it. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
- I think you confused me with someone else. I have never heard of that man, nor can I think of any other reason why I should be particularly qualified to have an opinion about his photo. Hans Adler 18:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Zurich or Zürich
Hi Hans, this discussion might be of interest to you. Best Regards -- Marek.69 20:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. In this case I would actually have been slightly in favour of Zurich. But no doubt Zürich is slowly becoming the more common and more 'correct' spelling in English, so I am happy with the outcome of the discussion. I guess I will have to stop using this as an example, though. Hans Adler 18:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello?
Bishzilla mentioned you here. Welcome in pocket, bring all the bobsledding Adlers! bishzilla ROARR!! 12:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC).
- Wer ist diese Bishzilla? Und wo ist der Bahnhof? Drmies (talk) 16:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Time to smoke the peace pipe?
Do you think we might call a truce between us? We don't have to be best buddies or anything, but I don't think our mutual sniping is doing anything beneficial for the project or the community, or maybe even each other. What do you say? BMK, Grouchy Realist (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I am not interested in pursuing this further. And so long as you don't trample on weaker editors again, I don't anticipate any serious future conflicts either. Hans Adler 00:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Can I get in on this too? I'd prefer it if we could just discuss the sources and the article content. Zad68 00:11, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- It is impossible to improve a fiercely protected super-biased article without discussing stonewalling techniques and the editors who apply them. Hans Adler 00:15, 9 January 2014 (UTC)