Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:30, 1 February 2014

Archives
User talk:Zarbon/archive1 User talk:Zarbon/archive2 User talk:Zarbon/archive3

Archived

I have archived my last talk page. Zarbon (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Tim1357 (talk) 04:11, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Zarbon trivia

IIRC, you were the one to source that Beckett bit to Zarbon right? The sentence where it says:

"In an issue of Beckett Anime, a Beckett magazine publication, Zarbon was voted as one of the top five greatest henchmen of all anime, and was the only character from Dragon Ball Z on the list."

It just crossed my mind that a minute rectification may need to be done. All we know is that he was the only guy from "Dragon Ball Z" on that list; does this mean that he is the only character from the franchise who Beckett ever mentioned? If so, let's amend "Dragon Ball Z" to "Dragon Ball" in order to avoid slight confusion. My apologies for being a little picky but, does this make sense to you? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, he is the only character from Dragon Ball, Z, and GT to be mentioned as being the best in the greatest henchman on the list. So yes, it would be wise to fixate to Dragon Ball there as its from the entire franchise. - Zarbon (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ritorevolto2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ritorevolto2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Zarbonfigure.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zarbonfigure.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR | 19:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Ep03 brendan bathtub.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ep03 brendan bathtub.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:54, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Jackjunia.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jackjunia.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Jackjunia2.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jackjunia2.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:27, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Friezafamilytree.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Friezafamilytree.JPG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 15:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. When you recently edited Characters of Carnivàle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hannah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nu, pogodi!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mysticforcekoraggknightwolf2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Mysticforcekoraggknightwolf2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ronald Barlog for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronald Barlog is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ronald Barlog until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 19:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of female supervillains, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.55.30 (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at List of female supervillains‎, are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read Misplaced Pages:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at List of female supervillains shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

My understanding of that article was that since all the other names were not "sourced," then why should we source all the remainder? The article shouldn't even be kept if all new additions need sourcing and the previous ones on the article don't have any sources of their own. - Zarbon (talk) 05:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Did you know?

That UDScott did go back and monitor the Sopranos changes; nothing was awry. But how odd! One cant help but imagine the aftermath of a drastic change as such. It's akin to getting hit on the head with a hammer from outta nowhere. That's what magic satchel is. I myself am a practitioner of chastity, but don't think a 2-liter bottle of coca-cola with make things all too different. To quote Bill Clinton, "I did not have sex with that woman." But you know, I wouldn't hide that! Try eating spicy buffalo wings for a change. Yes, I am an atheist (and a proud one at that!) but tie your shoelaces or ya might just trip. ~Kalki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blessings To All! (talk • contribs) 11:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

1. Chan, Pan (2004). "Beckett". Beckett Anime Unofficial Collector. 6 (10): 88. Retrieved 2008-12-19. Top 5 Evil Henchmen {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)