Revision as of 14:41, 4 February 2014 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,200 edits →Edit warring at Yemen: Consider agreeing to wait for consensus← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 4 February 2014 edit undoيوسف حسين (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users875 edits →Edit warring at YemenNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{unblock| reason= I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a ] in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --] (]) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)}} | {{unblock| reason= I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a ] in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --] (]) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)}} | ||
:This block can be lifted if you will agree to wait for a talk page consensus before reverting again at ]. ] (]) 14:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | :This block can be lifted if you will agree to wait for a talk page consensus before reverting again at ]. ] (]) 14:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
:: That's what i said, i was and still always willing to discuss anything with any editor, but i hope that discussions will receive some attention by admins in the future. Next time i will notify an admin to monitor any discussion i feel that reached a dead end--] (]) 15:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for February 4== | ==Disambiguation link notification for February 4== |
Revision as of 15:45, 4 February 2014
Archives |
Welcome
Hello, يوسف حسين, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Yemen, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Middayexpress (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
A complaint at WP:AN3 mentions you
Please see WP:AN3#User:يوسف حسين reported by User:Middayexpress (Result: ). It is claimed that you have been edit warring at Yemen. If the assertion is valid then you've already broken the WP:3RR rule and are at risk of being blocked. You may respond to the complaint if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Edit warring at Yemen
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Yemen. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report of this case was at WP:AN3, and can be viewed at this permanent link. EdJohnston (talk) 03:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
يوسف حسين (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a chance to reply in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --يوسف حسين (talk) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a ] in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --] (]) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a ] in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --] (]) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was not engaged in editwawing i only reverted the Yemen article 3 times in Feb 3 2014 The reason i said that i will not talk to "Afrocentrist" anymore is because it proved to be useless. This is not a theory as admin Ed Johnson said, they identify themselves as "pan Africanist". I talked to one admin to watch the page and stop them from removing content they do not like, but he did not respond for example, one of them removed this sentence without providing a coherent reason . The only reason behind his edit is the baseless and unfounded belief that Sheba was an African civilization. Why else would he remove that sentence? He removed a picture from the ancient history section for the same exact reason . I am the only one working on the Yemen article, non of them even tried to help me or contributed to the article usefully, their edits circled around Africa and Yemenis racial links! I had a long discussion with User:Midwayexpress here and it proved to be tiring, pointless and time consuming. They accused me first of having multiple accounts (which proved to be a lie ) and now of being racist. I did not had a ] in that case and this one. This block is not necessary since i have not damaged the article, i contributed to expand it as witnessed by its edit history. My grammar may not perfect since English is not my first language. Nevertheless, I am the only one expanding that article content. I did not disturb Misplaced Pages, i am simply trying to add information to the Yemen article. I am wiling to discuss anything with any editor but i hope that admins will be watching and monitoring the discussions. In the end, i am one person against a group of "pan Africanists" as they identify themselves --] (]) 06:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- This block can be lifted if you will agree to wait for a talk page consensus before reverting again at Yemen. EdJohnston (talk) 14:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
- That's what i said, i was and still always willing to discuss anything with any editor, but i hope that discussions will receive some attention by admins in the future. Next time i will notify an admin to monitor any discussion i feel that reached a dead end--يوسف حسين (talk) 15:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yemen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Category: