| Revision as of 13:13, 17 February 2014 editWee Curry Monster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,546 edits →Google Cite tool: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:07, 18 February 2014 edit undoLangus-TxT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,919 edits →Google Cite tool: rNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| PPS Sorry got the article wrong, it was ]. As a suggestion, try to add a page and quote if cites are likely to be challenged. ] <small>]</small> 13:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | PPS Sorry got the article wrong, it was ]. As a suggestion, try to add a page and quote if cites are likely to be challenged. ] <small>]</small> 13:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Unaccurate remark noted. BedsBookworm and I already had disagreements over content, and we work it out just fine (see ). That should tell you something, WCM. --] <small>(])</small> 12:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:07, 18 February 2014
Welcome!
|
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
David Jewett
It seems all of the David Jewett related pages have masses of unsourced speculative material in them at the moment. On of the claims is that Weddell thought Jewett's voyage was chiefly intended for the purpose of securing an exclusive claim to the wreck of the French ship Uranie and that Weddell "didn't believe" Jewett. None of this is in the Weddell text. Is there any source that makes these claims? If not they should be removed en masse. __ E L A Q U E A T E 19:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Meatpuppetry accusation
I note that you're accusing me on talk pages of having some kind of WP:MEAT puppetry association with Cambalachero. You should take this matter to the appropriate place (WP:SPI? Not sure). Otherwise, please stop doing it. --Langus (t) 22:44, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please read my comments more carefully. I didn't accuse you of Meat Puppetry but commented on reverting to insert dubiously sourced material from a topic banned editor; one banned for POV editing. On my first interaction with you, you were accusing me of POV editing. Coming here with that comment smacks of gross hypocrisy. Please cut out the personal crap, its the content we should discuss not each other. BedsBookworm (talk) 11:31, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Google Cite tool
The Google Cite tool creates a label for the citation. It creates the same label each time, so if you repeatedly use it, the reference is overwritten.
I'll fix it for you on David Jewett. Wee Curry Monster talk 13:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
PS on an unrelated matter, I see you've linked User:Cambalachero and User:Langus-TxT. Having had experience of both over the years I don't think it is the case. User:Cambalachero is a reasonable editor and whilst clearly a strong advocate of the Argentine POV is more than capable of compromising to agree on a WP:NPOV text. His main mistake in the topic ban was using sources from the Argentine revisionist movement, which has a habit of distorting history in advance of Peronism. They're accepted mainstream in Argentina, not so well accepted outside of the country. And I personally considered the arbcom result somewhat one sided, see for the reason why. Wee Curry Monster talk 13:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
PPS Sorry got the article wrong, it was History of the Falkland Islands. As a suggestion, try to add a page and quote if cites are likely to be challenged. Wee Curry Monster talk 13:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Unaccurate remark noted. BedsBookworm and I already had disagreements over content, and we work it out just fine (see ). That should tell you something, WCM. --Langus (t) 12:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)