| Revision as of 07:37, 18 February 2014 editIRISZOOM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,888 edits →WP:AE-notice: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:22, 18 February 2014 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators72,968 edits →Blocked for breaching 1RR at List of military occupations: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| I have opened a case against you at ]. --] (]) 07:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | I have opened a case against you at ]. --] (]) 07:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Blocked for breaching 1RR at ] == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> To enforce an ] decision, and for violating the ] on ], ]you have been ''']''' from editing for '''24 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page.<p> | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 08:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| | Ambox warning pn.svg | |||
| | icon size = 40px | |||
| }}<!-- This message is derived from Template:Uw-sanctions --> | |||
Revision as of 08:22, 18 February 2014
| This is Sir Joseph's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
(I'll write back on my talk page, unless specifically request otherwise. Thanks!)
Template:Archive box collapsible
Added request for undelete of this topic
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Eprovided.com. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
Mediation
Case is accepted. Page can be found here
Hinder
Buy the fucking record, and read the credits, cody hanson doesn't play the drums!!!!!!!
AFC Backlog
Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1823 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. |
AFC Backlog Drive
WP:AE-notice
I have opened a case against you at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. --IRISZOOM (talk) 07:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Blocked for breaching 1RR at List of military occupations
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating the 1RR on List of military occupations,
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)