| Revision as of 06:31, 5 March 2014 editQwer1995 (talk | contribs)132 edits →Lets resolve this: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:32, 5 March 2014 edit undoQwer1995 (talk | contribs)132 edits →Lets resolve thisNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| Hi,this edit war is not going to get both of us anywhere. Lets resolve this somehow. | Hi,this edit war is not going to get both of us anywhere. Lets resolve this somehow. | ||
| ] (]) 06:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)qwer1995 | |||
Revision as of 06:32, 5 March 2014
February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Airtel Super Singer 4 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Airtel Super Singer 4 was changed by Newwikiuser12345 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859197 on 2014-02-12T10:19:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Newwikiuser12345, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Newwikiuser12345! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
March 2014
Your recent editing history at Airtel Super Singer 4 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You may be reverting vandalism, but you are way past three reverts without any attempt to discuss the issue. If this goes to the admins and your edits are not clearly vandalism reverts you will likely both be blocked for edit warring. Meters (talk) 05:46, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Lets resolve this
Hi,this edit war is not going to get both of us anywhere. Lets resolve this somehow.
Qwer1995 (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)qwer1995