Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:50, 25 March 2014

India: Cinema Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

Film: Indian Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Total Siyapaa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 20 days

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Total Siyapaa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 20 days

Abuse by Socks.

This page has been the target of socks of LanguageXpert – MusicPoineer, Xcrescent9, Morexbine, Archtexlic and Ibnebatutaji. They attempted to suppress negative reviews, BO collections and were even successful in doing so. Their disruption has left the page in tatters and some Good-faithed editors like Vvarkey, ZORDANLIGHTER and Whistlingwoods harassed. – Soham (talk) 07:26, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Yup, so it's important to respond to their actions correctly and not get yourself blocked DP 08:51, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LanguageXpert/Archive#14_March_2014--ZORDANLIGHTER (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Apology needed from Administrators for trusting socks of LanguageXpert

I want all administrators(DP ,ES&L, Greedo8 ,Mr. Stradivarius ,C.Fred) to apologize to me for not trusting my reliable sources and giving unnecessary and pointless importance to the the socks created by one user.Huon (talk)'Is one and only good faith Administrator.If users make mistakes then they are punished but when Administrators make mistake then they should also repent. All those users who were constantly arguing with me are actually one person and these accounts are blocked by wikipedia. The hero of this movie is a Pakistani and LanguageXpert is a pakistani so he is unable to tolerate negative reviews and low box office reception in India. One thing is certain any new account which will favour the movie is a sock of LanguageXpert (talk).Ibnebatutaji (talk),Xcrescent9 (talk),Archtexlic (talk),ArjunPatel89 (talk) and TakenUrs are one person-something administrators never understood, now you powerful administrators check this user account page and you will find them blocked byWikipedia .--ZORDANLIGHTER (talk) 08:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)]

There's no apology needed from me: you were TOLD to stop removing text from this talkpage because it was against policy, yet you continued to do it. I'm sorry you felt you were somehow above the rules, and that you forced me to block you. ES&L 11:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

I have no regret that I removed his text. as he was a sock and i was aware of that. I was frustrated that this LanguageXpert is using socks like Xcrescent9 to avoid the truth. At that time I didn't know how to report a sock. Which I learned yesterday and reported them as sock and I will track this LanguageXpert wherever he exists. I can smell him through his comments. I removed his worthless comments in good faithZORDANLIGHTER (talk) 16:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

"If users make mistakes then they are punished..." A block is never used as a punishment. See WP:Blocking. Greedo8 15:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Exactly. I've never issued a punishment block before, and I certainly did not this time. ES&L 16:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

You made no such assertion of sockpuppetry in your edit summary. My one revert here was in response to this edit you made with the edit summary "XCRESCENT has accepted in hid previous edits that he was wrong about his objections . So I believe his discussions will create confusion for administrators. I am removing All discussions related to his irrelevant objections". Discussions may be archived but should not be deleted; that's why I restored about 3k of text.

My other recent edits have been technical edits, adding {{reflist-talk}} templates to better display the references included in comments. —C.Fred (talk) 19:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

This link is for good faith administrators even though the section was removed but it can be viewed in revision history https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Whistlingwoods&oldid=600252820#You_respond_too_slowlyWhistlingwoods (talk) 09:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Legacy of master sock https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LanguageXpert/Archive#03_November_2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whistlingwoods (talk • contribs) 09:39, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Infobox budget figures discussion

Hey everyone. Since it seems like some sort of edit war is imminent, I started a topic on the budget figures to discuss and come to a consensus on what the figures should be. It seems to me that at least one of the sources supports 8 crore as the budget figures. If you want to remove these sourced figures, you should have a good reason for doing so. – FenixFeather 15:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I 100% agree with FenixFeather. 39.32.206.224 (talk) 15:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

The IP is a probable sock of LanguageXpert, who has been all over this article like a rash with multiple socks. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Darkness ! I can not make what you wana suggest, you read dissuasion please and see history https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Total_Siyapaa&action=history 39.32.206.224 (talk) 15:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

• Start-Class India articles
• Low-importance India articles
• Start-Class India articles of Low-importance
• Start-Class Indian cinema articles
• Unknown-importance Indian cinema articles
• Start-Class Indian cinema articles of Unknown-importance
• WikiProject Indian cinema articles
• WikiProject India articles
• Start-Class film articles
• Indian cinema task force articles
• WikiProject Film articles