Misplaced Pages

User talk:FeloniousMonk: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:28, 20 September 2004 editFeloniousMonk (talk | contribs)18,409 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 06:37, 21 September 2004 edit undoMpolo (talk | contribs)1,674 edits Shroud of TurinNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


:::Afraid I'm no help with images, sorry. Anything else I can help with, just ask. Any idea when you'll cut-over to the new article? --] 20:28, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) :::Afraid I'm no help with images, sorry. Anything else I can help with, just ask. Any idea when you'll cut-over to the new article? --] 20:28, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)

::::As of yet, there are no (completely) negative opinions about the new article. I would like to have JDG's support (or at least acceptance) to avoid a revert war. In any case, I hope to make the change within a day or two -- then we can work on hammering out the (apparently few) objections that remain. -- ] 06:37, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:37, 21 September 2004

Hello FeloniousMonk and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!


Shroud of Turin

Check the version that Eloquence and I have been working on at Shroud of Turin/temp. We think that we have a good NPOV base there. (Rather than starting over yet again... I just did that. :-) ) -- Mpolo 19:50, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)

Excellent... you two have saved me so much headache and frustration. That is a much, much better version than what currently exists. What about JDG? He's certainly going to try to revert to his preferred version. Is there any way I can help or anything I can do to assist? --FM 19:59, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
JDG has glanced at the new article, but not read it through. His comment after glancing was positive, so there may be hope. Right now I'm just trying to get a bit of consensus to make the swap to the new version. I'm also working on getting a few more images. It's an interesting situation -- if the shroud is a fake, photos are definitely public domain, but if it's real, then one could argue that they're not... If you know where to get some free images of it, that'd be a great help. -- Mpolo 20:11, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)
Afraid I'm no help with images, sorry. Anything else I can help with, just ask. Any idea when you'll cut-over to the new article? --FM 20:28, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
As of yet, there are no (completely) negative opinions about the new article. I would like to have JDG's support (or at least acceptance) to avoid a revert war. In any case, I hope to make the change within a day or two -- then we can work on hammering out the (apparently few) objections that remain. -- Mpolo 06:37, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)