User talk:AhamSarvatra: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 21:20, 16 April 2014 editDarkness Shines (talk \| contribs)31,762 edits →Notification: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:42, 17 April 2014 edit undoAhamSarvatra (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,152 edits →Notification Next edit →
Line 27:		Line 27:

	{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)		{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
			:Dude, I take this as personal attack, trying to suppress anyone who has ideas against yours. Thank you very much for being so intolerant to any kind of discussion. Cheers! -] (]) 04:42, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:42, 17 April 2014

Archives (index)

2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghazwatul Hind, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ISI and Huji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Larkana temple attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dharmashala and Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Darkness Shines (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Dude, I take this as personal attack, trying to suppress anyone who has ideas against yours. Thank you very much for being so intolerant to any kind of discussion. Cheers! -Vatsan34 (talk) 04:42, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:20, 16 April 2014 editDarkness Shines (talk \| contribs)31,762 edits →Notification: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:42, 17 April 2014 edit undoAhamSarvatra (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,152 edits →Notification Next edit →
Line 27:		Line 27:

	{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)		{{Ivmbox \| image = yes \| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ], ], and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic\|{{{t}}}}}} --> \| valign = center \| ] }} ] (]) 21:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
			:Dude, I take this as personal attack, trying to suppress anyone who has ideas against yours. Thank you very much for being so intolerant to any kind of discussion. Cheers! -] (]) 04:42, 17 April 2014 (UTC)