| Revision as of 14:34, 21 September 2004 editTheresa knott (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,922 edits replies to varoius people← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:52, 21 September 2004 edit undo205.188.116.143 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Welcome to my talk page. If you've come to complain, whine, moan, question my judgement, my intelligence, my sanity, or tell me off in anyway, that's fine. I'm a big girl ===(READ FAT...eeeeww!)=== who can take it.If you've come to chat, compliment me, have a laugh, or discuss articles that's even better | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| #] | |||
| ---- | |||
| Welcome to my talk page. If you've come to complain, whine, moan, question my judgement, my intelligence, my sanity, or tell me off in anyway, that's fine. I'm a big girl who can take it.If you've come to chat, compliment me, have a laugh, or discuss articles that's even better.] | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==WikiLove== | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| Theresa, I've noticed that a lot of users have a Wikistress graphic, in the shape of a thermometer. I was thinking that an appropriate Wiki-love image to give to someone who's wikistress is very high might be a stylized ice cube, to help ''cool'' them. Any thoughts? <tt>]]</tt> 17:39, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Yeah sound good although an ice cube is a bit of a dull shape. What about a snowflake or a cucumber (cool as a cucumber). ] ] 19:12, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Either a snowflake and/or a cucumber would be ''brilliant''. :) <tt>]]</tt> 19:27, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Well I'm not too good with cartoons - diagrams are my thing but this is what I've come up with so far. ] ] 00:21, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| It's great, Theresa. :) Mr. Cool! (or Ms. Cool). Maybe there should be a smile, though, as befitting WikiLove. :) <tt>]]</tt> 12:45, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Do cool people smile? ever? I'll try my best though give me a few days. ] ] 12:57, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| When they work with ''you'' on Misplaced Pages, they can't help but be happy and smile. <tt>]]</tt> 13:12, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| I have no idea who Magenta De Vine is, but her likeness as a cucumber is fantastic! :) <tt>]]</tt> 23:07, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Those are great, but what if I'm as hot as a jalipeño? - ] 23:54, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ::Now now people. Some of you are just going to have to learn how to draw yourselves, seeing as I've got a couple of real article diagrams I need to work on. You can start with my drawing tutorial at ] note that most office software packages have some sort of rudimentary drawing tools and they all work in much the same way, so even if you don't have Micro$oft you can still follow the tutorial. | |||
| :::Well, I won't lobby for the less serious efforts, but sadly, absolutely nothing will ever teach me how to draw a jalipeño.... - ] 05:34, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| * Try . heh heh - as if you people don't waste enough time on wiki ] 09:12, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| *Thanks Steve. That website is a lot of fun (I'd better not tell the kids about it or I'll never get them off the computer). To Nuh-huh here is a quick drawing I made by sticking a face made at the above website onto a clip art of a pepper. It's very easy. A child could do it!] ] 10:14, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ::It is a cute web-site. Now I have to find a child to make it work (just kidding...). Of course, TK, it ''could'' be ''Chilly as a pepper''<g>.... - ] 22:23, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == Evangelical Lutheran Church in America == | |||
| While this article doesn't envolve sock puppets or fake bans it does envolve penieses peripeherally, so perhaps might be slightly on topic. ] has had the paragraph about sexual abuse removed twice by differnt ISPs with the same edit summary. I think it may be an attempt to remove the info from the article. Have to leave be somewhere in ten minutes, I will explain further if nesecarry. Please add the page to your watch list, look into the matter and review my actions if nesecarry. -] 18:45, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :OK I've added it to my watchlist, if the anon comes back I'll try to talk to him. ] ] 22:14, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks.-] 05:36, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == Foreskin restoration edits == | |||
| Greetings. It is noted that you are involved with the editing of the Foreskin restoration article. Over the pass week or so this article has seen heightened activity in which you have been involved. The article is steadily generating into a POV defence of foreskin restoration. My question to you is simple. If you are not able to contribute to NPOV in the article why you do not simply recuse yourself and just walk away? - ] 03:37, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Here you go again accusing me of POV pushing without any evidence.Which of my edits are a "POV defence of forskin restoration"? | |||
| where I remove a "Foreskin restoration '''has''' beneficial emotional results" and replaced it with " Foreskin restoration '''has been reported as''' having beneficial emotional results" | |||
| Or is it Where I removed " Cosmesis is dramatically improved by restoration" replaced "psycological aspects with "emotional aspects",removed the phrase " This article reflected a pro-circumcision cultural point of view" about the Prepuce Restoration Seekers, and added a quote from that paper? | |||
| My edits to that page have been to tone done the 'pro' arguments and NPOV the article. Did you even look at my edits to see what the were? Or did you just look at the history, see my name, and automatically assume I would be encoraging a pro POV. Please stop with the trolling now. I have no time for you. ] ] 08:23, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == TRECA == | |||
| Hi Theresa -- I had contacted someone there by email a couple of weeks ago, so it's nice to see that something came of it! | |||
| And thanks for reverting my talk page :-) | |||
| Peace, ]<font color=chartreuse>|</font>] 15:10, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| You're more than welcome. It's Mr Treason who vandalised it. ] ] 15:13, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I don't doubt that your intent is good, but I would appreciate it if you would not remove messages from my talk page. If whoever it is you're reverting there is discussing, he is at least not vandalising elsewhere; and while previous efforts to talk to him may have failed, hey, it can't hurt to try again. ]] ] 20:08, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :Well OK but you should know that ] is currently under a hard ban for making death threats. He can't be blocked because he edits from AOL proxies, so reverting is the only option we have. When I see him about I just revert every edit he makes as do a number of other users, but I will refrain from reverting his talk on your user page in the future. ] ] 20:30, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you. ]] ] 20:31, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :After reading his comments at Mirv's page, I think it is a near certainty that Mr. Treason is a kid. Previously, I had assumed a deranged adult, but it's hard to believe this to be the case after he expresses the willingness to ''join'' the Wiki Watch... whatever the heck it was called, after it was ''proved'' to be a child's invention. He's a smart kid, who knows how to correctly use words like "cabal", but it seems clear to me now that he is certainly a kid, and not merely a childish adult. <tt>]]</tt> 21:04, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not sure, I still think of him as being an adult. Whatever his age is, he's certainly a nasty piece of work. ] ] 14:34, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! == | |||
| Much appreciated. ] (])]] 20:44, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :No problem. I'm mass reverting Mr treason at the moment. ] ] 20:45, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == Spiritual Beauty == | |||
| I have reformed. Thank you for your patience. | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| You did excellent work in resolving the 33451 situation, hopefully for good this time. Lately almost every time some new issue with him caught my attention, I found you or somebody else was already dealing with it. --] 21:58, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks, though it wasn't all down to me. ] ] 14:34, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ==Tits== | |||
| That's just funny. -- ] | |||
| : :-) ] ] | |||
| ==TMS== | |||
| I don't get this. ] was going to get deleted, right? And now it's still there, right? And the Vfd notice has been removed, right? Somehow this went wrong - the votes clearly showed delete 19/11! ] | ] | |||
| No we don't delete on a simple majority. We only delete on consensus. The exact definition of consensus varies but since am one of those people who passionately argue against allowing it to drop lower than two thirds I can hardly complain when a page I think should be deleted and it doesn't get consensus :-( So since the article is to be kept we'll just have to get rid of all the POV and self selecting polls etc. | |||
Revision as of 23:52, 21 September 2004
Welcome to my talk page. If you've come to complain, whine, moan, question my judgement, my intelligence, my sanity, or tell me off in anyway, that's fine. I'm a big girl ===(READ FAT...eeeeww!)=== who can take it.If you've come to chat, compliment me, have a laugh, or discuss articles that's even better