Revision as of 03:11, 26 June 2006 editAndrew Parodi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,627 edits →Authorship of A Course In Miracles article← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:18, 26 June 2006 edit undoSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits →Authorship of A Course In Miracles articleNext edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::''PS:'' Regarding your suggestion that I have an "attachment" to that article, I actually have an attachment to everything I write. I can't imagine writing something that I don't have attachment to. You have no more right to tell me not to have attachments to what I write than I do to tell you to HAVE attachments to what you write. To each his own. -- ] 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC) | ::''PS:'' Regarding your suggestion that I have an "attachment" to that article, I actually have an attachment to everything I write. I can't imagine writing something that I don't have attachment to. You have no more right to tell me not to have attachments to what I write than I do to tell you to HAVE attachments to what you write. To each his own. -- ] 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::<sup> ] ] 03:18 </sup> ] '''wrote''': I am going to ignore you on my talk page now. I consider your attitude harrassing. Thanks. |
Revision as of 03:18, 26 June 2006
Housemates Table and Original Research
Please see the talk page of BB06 to discuss the use of the housemates table in the article -- CHANLORD / 02:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
The helpme request
In case someone asks in the future, I finally found the list of currently activated extensions. (Located here). Thanks for responding to my request.--SomeStranger 12:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Archives
Authorship of A Course In Miracles article
I'll be brief. I am not posting on the talk page anymore because there is a great deal of arguing there that I am not interested in.
I posted to your talk page because you are the only one who has voiced the concern that the article is not important.
I'm not going back to the talk page of that article because it's too ugly. If you want to talk about it, we'll have to do it via our respective talk pages. -- Andrew Parodi 03:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- PS: Regarding your suggestion that I have an "attachment" to that article, I actually have an attachment to everything I write. I can't imagine writing something that I don't have attachment to. You have no more right to tell me not to have attachments to what I write than I do to tell you to HAVE attachments to what you write. To each his own. -- Andrew Parodi 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ste4k wrote: I am going to ignore you on my talk page now. I consider your attitude harrassing. Thanks.
- PS: Regarding your suggestion that I have an "attachment" to that article, I actually have an attachment to everything I write. I can't imagine writing something that I don't have attachment to. You have no more right to tell me not to have attachments to what I write than I do to tell you to HAVE attachments to what you write. To each his own. -- Andrew Parodi 03:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)