Misplaced Pages

Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:14, 9 May 2014 editDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits Revert, why: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 16:18, 9 May 2014 edit undoFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,181 edits Revert, why: reNext edit →
Line 65: Line 65:


200,000 is the commonly cited number, a simple search of the literature shows that. Accusations of falsifying quotations are as usual, pure bullshit, there are no quotations there. ] (]) 16:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC) 200,000 is the commonly cited number, a simple search of the literature shows that. Accusations of falsifying quotations are as usual, pure bullshit, there are no quotations there. ] (]) 16:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
: Will you ever learn? This was explained to you back in 2012, at ]. You even conceded the point back then. 200,000 may well be a (not "the") commonly cited figure, but we simply don't know whether it was the figure he was thinking of when he said certain figures were likely to be too low. He could have been thinking of any other of the many figures that had been cited. What you're doing by combining this is a classic case of ]; stop doing that. ] ] 16:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:18, 9 May 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 20 days 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Good articleRape during the Bangladesh Liberation War has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 2, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 22, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 2, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
September 25, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 6, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHuman rights Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / South Asia / Cold War
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
South Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconWomen's History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBangladesh High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPakistan Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIndia: History Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Stfg, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 24 February 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 20 days 


Revert, why

200,000 is the commonly cited number, a simple search of the literature shows that. Accusations of falsifying quotations are as usual, pure bullshit, there are no quotations there. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:14, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Will you ever learn? This was explained to you back in 2012, at Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War/Archive 1#Source problem. You even conceded the point back then. 200,000 may well be a (not "the") commonly cited figure, but we simply don't know whether it was the figure he was thinking of when he said certain figures were likely to be too low. He could have been thinking of any other of the many figures that had been cited. What you're doing by combining this is a classic case of WP:SYNTH; stop doing that. Fut.Perf. 16:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Categories: