| Revision as of 11:55, 27 June 2006 editNscheffey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,278 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:20, 27 June 2006 edit undoPeripitus (talk | contribs)38,440 edits →[]: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Delete''', per RGTraynor. Fails ], article isn't truthful. It sure fooled me before I double-checked. --''']''' <small>]</small> 09:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', per RGTraynor. Fails ], article isn't truthful. It sure fooled me before I double-checked. --''']''' <small>]</small> 09:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Her claim to fame appears to be the books she's written. But I can't find any independent (non-Amazon Customer) reviews of any of them. Until I see some I say delete. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 11:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Her claim to fame appears to be the books she's written. But I can't find any independent (non-Amazon Customer) reviews of any of them. Until I see some I say delete. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 11:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - vanity and/or advertising page. Article does not assert anything that meets ]. Per RGTraynor the Emmy claim appears to be false and the IMdB credits are not inspiring --] ] 12:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:20, 27 June 2006
Sharon Janis
"After having done some minor edits to improve the article's quality a little bit. I've come to the conclusion that this article is a thinly veiled advertisement. Even though subject is an author, I am not convinced that they are notable enough to warrant inclusion. Plus the only link provided is a link to a commercial site.DeleteTheRingess 04:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep She's an Emmy award winner and she has a decent number of Google results for her name. That's good enough for me. joturner 04:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Joturner--TBCTaLk?!? 04:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per TBC. ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 05:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep, but clean up. The subject is notable, but the article is in horrible shape, and needs to be brought within the bounds of WP:NPOV. --Coredesat talk 08:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)- Delete. She is not, in fact, an "Emmy winner." The local newscast for which she was a film editor was nominated for a local Emmy (there are twenty-someodd regional "Emmy" chapters). Her IMDB credits are all in film editing, not in line editing. RGTraynor 08:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per RGTraynor. Fails WP:NPOV, article isn't truthful. It sure fooled me before I double-checked. --Coredesat talk 09:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Her claim to fame appears to be the books she's written. But I can't find any independent (non-Amazon Customer) reviews of any of them. Until I see some I say delete. --Nscheffey 11:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - vanity and/or advertising page. Article does not assert anything that meets WP:BIO. Per RGTraynor the Emmy claim appears to be false and the IMdB credits are not inspiring --Peripitus (Talk) 12:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)