Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Gary Renard: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:42, 27 June 2006 editKonstable (talk | contribs)7,893 edits []: keep← Previous edit Revision as of 16:39, 27 June 2006 edit undoRavenswing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,924 edits []Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
*<s>'''Weak keep''', appears to be at least marginally notable per ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 08:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)</s> *<s>'''Weak keep''', appears to be at least marginally notable per ]. --''']''' <small>]</small> 08:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)</s>
*'''Delete'''. After double-checking, seems to fail ] - only 429 ''unique'' Google hits, and no mentions in any notable media. --''']''' <small>]</small> 09:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. After double-checking, seems to fail ] - only 429 ''unique'' Google hits, and no mentions in any notable media. --''']''' <small>]</small> 09:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' - 429 ''unique'' G-hits is rather a lot, actually. ] 16:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' and '''Clean-up'''. RGTraynor is right that the book's sales rank alone makes the author notable. Defeinitely a notable figure in the ] universe/cult/religion. Article just needs prose improvement. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 11:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' and '''Clean-up'''. RGTraynor is right that the book's sales rank alone makes the author notable. Defeinitely a notable figure in the ] universe/cult/religion. Article just needs prose improvement. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 11:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per Amazon.com sales rank.--] 13:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' per Amazon.com sales rank.--] 13:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:39, 27 June 2006

Gary Renard

Topic matter is unverifiable having no reliable published source per Item 6.3. This slightly appears to be a vanity page used to support a book which hasn't received multiple awards. Without references the article is original research at best, and it does not establish any sort of notability that can be referenced about this author. Ste4k 07:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep. Err, the guy's book's sales rank on Amazon is 1,313, which is pretty hefty; there's nothing in WP:BIO that requires books to win multiple awards for their authors to be notable. I agree that the article needs considerable cleanup to be worth much as biography (heck, his Amazon profile has more bio info), but this certainly clears the WP:BIO bar and by a good bit. RGTraynor 08:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)