Revision as of 20:51, 15 May 2014 editRswallis10 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,281 edits →Enforcing xenophobic rule← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:54, 15 May 2014 edit undoIronGargoyle (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators152,147 editsm Reverted edits by Rswallis10 (talk): personal attack toward another user (HG)Next edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:::: Yet another common practice Helmboy seems to want to reinvent to suit his own agenda. I've tagged his page with a 3RR warning. --] (]) 08:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC) | :::: Yet another common practice Helmboy seems to want to reinvent to suit his own agenda. I've tagged his page with a 3RR warning. --] (]) 08:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::I added a note as well, and some guidance on what "non-English language" actually means. --] (]) 09:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC) | :::::I added a note as well, and some guidance on what "non-English language" actually means. --] (]) 09:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Your Stupidity == | |||
You removed my edit to the List of the Big Bang Theory episodes because you said it was original research. I don't know how you y'all do it in Australia, but here in America, when you cite a source you are recognizing that it is not your own research. I can give you a list of hundreds of websites that will confirm that the Big Bang Theory Season 8 WILL take place during the 2014-15 television season. I don't understand why you have to be the nazi here about this especially because you are wrong about it. Every accredited website for TV ratings has stated that Season 8 will take place from 2014-15, so it should be allowed to be added to the page. You are not the boss here and you can't cry every time you don't get your way. Get your facts straight and then maybe come back to wikipedia. Btw, who the hell is u at 7:00 in the morning anyway editing wikipedia??? Do you have a life? ] (]) 20:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Rswallis10 |
Revision as of 20:54, 15 May 2014
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AussieLegend. |
pages Userboxes Cheatsheet Vandals, bad
sources etc TV programs
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
It is approximately 10:39 PM where this user lives (Raymond Terrace). |
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31 |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Threads with no replies in 7 days may be automatically moved. Discussions here are automatically indexed by User:Legobot) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
DK11040
I'm about ready to ask for administrator intervention with this user. Would you be willing to assist draft a report? Davejohnsan (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, I thought that I already had drafted something but I can't find it right now. If you want to start I'm sure that I can find plenty to add. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:38, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'm noticing this guy, too. Lots of odd little edits, some constructive, some not. He doesn't seem to want to discuss from what you're saying, and doesn't know the meaning of edit summary. I haven't seen anything too problematic yet, but he's worrying. --Drmargi (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, for now he's stopped uploading images that are copyvios or for which has falsely claimed authorship. That was problematic. Today he changed all of the prod codes for NCIS and I had to revert the changes in all 11 articles. I find myself having to watch his edits like a hawk. Many of the edits, like inexplicably removing images are a concern, and so on. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's about what I'm seeing, minus the pictures. I haven't run across that yet. I've seen him largely at Person of Interest and CSI, and I noticed the penchant for production code changes, too. We'll keep an eye on him. --Drmargi (talk) 16:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, for now he's stopped uploading images that are copyvios or for which has falsely claimed authorship. That was problematic. Today he changed all of the prod codes for NCIS and I had to revert the changes in all 11 articles. I find myself having to watch his edits like a hawk. Many of the edits, like inexplicably removing images are a concern, and so on. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- I'm noticing this guy, too. Lots of odd little edits, some constructive, some not. He doesn't seem to want to discuss from what you're saying, and doesn't know the meaning of edit summary. I haven't seen anything too problematic yet, but he's worrying. --Drmargi (talk) 15:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Enforcing xenophobic rule
Besides the fact that you have no evidence that the foreign broadcast wasn't shown in english with foreign subtitling. Upholding this promotes a xenophobic culture within the english and other translations on articles. How this short sighted ruling made it in so easily makes one question the validity of other guidelines. helmboy 21:44, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- What nonsense. You can't cry xenophobia as a rationale for "assuming" something is being done in another country. As Aussie has explained to you in some detail, there is consensus governing inclusion of television broadcasts in non-English speaking countries. We cannot assume a program is broadcast in English (which is a proper noun and capitalized, no matter how clever you want to be); the burden is on you to provide a source an English-language program is broadcast in English with or without subtitles rather than being dubbed into the language of the country. No source? It stays out. The standard is that only English-language broadcasts go on the broadcast list in the en-wikipedia. --Drmargi (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speaking for someone on their talk page, just shows a that you have no respect of boundaries. As for nonsense, the consensus that was reached is clearly xenophobic and based on your rationale, there should be absolutely no mention of anything that is non-English in English targeted articles. helmboy 05:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- If you look at the top of my talk page, you'll see a notice saying that friendly talk page stalkers are welcome here so Drmargi's comments are more than welcome, and correct. If ou don't like the consensus, then feel free to start another discussion. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:19, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speaking for someone on their talk page, just shows a that you have no respect of boundaries. As for nonsense, the consensus that was reached is clearly xenophobic and based on your rationale, there should be absolutely no mention of anything that is non-English in English targeted articles. helmboy 05:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yet another common practice Helmboy seems to want to reinvent to suit his own agenda. I've tagged his page with a 3RR warning. --Drmargi (talk) 08:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- I added a note as well, and some guidance on what "non-English language" actually means. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yet another common practice Helmboy seems to want to reinvent to suit his own agenda. I've tagged his page with a 3RR warning. --Drmargi (talk) 08:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)