| Revision as of 18:58, 27 June 2006 editAndrew Parodi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,627 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:08, 27 June 2006 edit undoAngusmclellan (talk | contribs)64,067 edits merge and redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| *'''Merge''' to ] per TBC. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 11:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' to ] per TBC. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 11:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' I hope everyone is aware that Ste4k has a personal vendetta against all ACIM-related articles on Misplaced Pages. In addition to supporting the deletion attempt of the article ], this user has initiated deletion attempts of the following ACIM-related articles: ], ], ], ], and ]. And on the main ACIM page, this editor will not accept anything, not even the official sites of Foundation for ACIM and Foundation for Inner Peace, as acceptable sources. Personal bias masked as attempt to uphold Misplaced Pages guidelines (all the while ignoring Misplaced Pages guidelines by trying to deprive Misplaced Pages of articles about a notable topic). -- ] 18:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' I hope everyone is aware that Ste4k has a personal vendetta against all ACIM-related articles on Misplaced Pages. In addition to supporting the deletion attempt of the article ], this user has initiated deletion attempts of the following ACIM-related articles: ], ], ], ], and ]. And on the main ACIM page, this editor will not accept anything, not even the official sites of Foundation for ACIM and Foundation for Inner Peace, as acceptable sources. Personal bias masked as attempt to uphold Misplaced Pages guidelines (all the while ignoring Misplaced Pages guidelines by trying to deprive Misplaced Pages of articles about a notable topic). -- ] 18:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' (not that there's anything worth merging) '''and redirect''' to ] per TBC. Indeed, ] does not apply, and ] is yet to be written. Still, it's completely unsourced and there's nothing in the article to suggest that the subject is any way important except through his connection to the ACIM book. A mention there, which he already has, is quite enough. ] ] 20:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:08, 27 June 2006
Kenneth Wapnick
Reason this article should be deleted:
This article has been determined to be noncompliant to Misplaced Pages content policy as discussed in it's Analysis for Deletion based on :
- WP:NOR - Articles may not contain any previously unpublished theories, data, statements, concepts, arguments, or ideas; or any new analysis or synthesis of published data, statements, concepts, arguments, or ideas that serves to advance a position.
- WP:VER - Information on Misplaced Pages must be reliable. Facts, viewpoints, theories, and arguments may only be included in articles if they have already been published by reliable and reputable sources. Articles should cite these sources whenever possible. Any unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
- WP:NPOV - This article is not written from the neutral point of view, and appears to hope to advertise the external links, rather than to use them as sources of information.
- WP:NOT - Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. Therefore, Misplaced Pages articles are not propaganda or advocacy of any kind.
- WP:NOT - Misplaced Pages is not a place to publish original thoughts and analyses.
using guidelines:
- WP:BIO - The subject of this article fails to meet criteria testing whether a person has sufficient external notice to ensure that they can be covered from a neutral point of view based on verifiable information from reliable sources, without straying into original research.
and serves only to further promote non-notable topics rather than to report what is notable. Ste4k 05:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Article seems to have a bit of vanity as well, evidenced by statements such as "the ever-growing popularity of ACIM seemed to know no bounds." Wapnick seems to be notable only for his role of editing segments of A Course In Miracles and heading Foundation for A Course In Miracles but not much for anything else, thus I suggest the article to be redirected/merged to Foundation for A Course In Miracles--TBCTaLk?!? 05:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Article is not vanity because it wasn't written by Kenneth Wapnick. Take a look at the page history and see who started this article. -- Andrew Parodi 18:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Foundation for A Course In Miracles per above. --Coredesat talk 09:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to Foundation for A Course In Miracles per TBC. --Nscheffey 11:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I hope everyone is aware that Ste4k has a personal vendetta against all ACIM-related articles on Misplaced Pages. In addition to supporting the deletion attempt of the article Authorship of A Course in Miracles, this user has initiated deletion attempts of the following ACIM-related articles: William Thetford, Kenneth Wapnick, Foundation for Inner Peace, Foundation for A Course In Miracles, and Gary Renard. And on the main ACIM page, this editor will not accept anything, not even the official sites of Foundation for ACIM and Foundation for Inner Peace, as acceptable sources. Personal bias masked as attempt to uphold Misplaced Pages guidelines (all the while ignoring Misplaced Pages guidelines by trying to deprive Misplaced Pages of articles about a notable topic). -- Andrew Parodi 18:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Merge (not that there's anything worth merging) and redirect to A Course in Miracles per TBC. Indeed, WP:VAIN does not apply, and WP:No Hagiography is yet to be written. Still, it's completely unsourced and there's nothing in the article to suggest that the subject is any way important except through his connection to the ACIM book. A mention there, which he already has, is quite enough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)