Revision as of 22:01, 27 June 2006 editHaeleth (talk | contribs)3,970 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:11, 27 June 2006 edit undoFrancisTyers (talk | contribs)13,802 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete''' textbook ] and ]. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 13:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' textbook ] and ]. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 13:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom; random examples that don't prove much anyway. — ] <small>]</small> 22:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom; random examples that don't prove much anyway. — ] <small>]</small> 22:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Comment''' interested parties should read article by Harold Somers. - ] ] 22:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:11, 27 June 2006
Examples of SYSTRAN machine translation
Original research, not to mention that RTT evaluation is pretty much disproved as a methodology. - FrancisTyers · 10:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete oh, I'm the nominator! - FrancisTyers · 10:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk 11:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete textbook original research and indiscriminate information. --Nscheffey 13:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; random examples that don't prove much anyway. — Haeleth Talk 22:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment interested parties should read this article by Harold Somers. - FrancisTyers · 22:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)