Revision as of 10:17, 28 June 2006 view sourcePulastya ram (talk | contribs)73 edits rv troll who has admitted he is clueless about rajputs. See Talk:Rajput history (comment from Dab) : "it's true that I have no idea about Rajputs "← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:45, 28 June 2006 view source Telex (talk | contribs)7,562 edits rv. edit by banned user.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{semiprotected}} | |||
] riding ]]] | |||
] | |||
A '''Rajput''' ( ]: {{Unicode|राजपूत}} ''rājput'', from ] राजपुत्र ''rāja-putra'', "son of a king") is a hindu ] caste. The Rajputs trace their origins to the royal Rajput dynasties. It is estimated that currently there are 40 million Rajputs. | |||
'''Rajputs''' (from the ] ] compound ''{{IAST|rājaputra}}'', "son of a king") are a prominent social group of ], ] and ]. They claim descent from the ancient royal dynasties of the region. Within the Hindu ], Rajputs constitute one of the principal groups belonging to the ] ]. | |||
<!--Census breakdown is | |||
These are estimates from an evengeligacal organization. | |||
--> | |||
Rajput dynasties played a prominent role in the history of ]. They developed an ethos of warlike chivalry that served as the benchmark for other Indian communities as the latter ascended to regional dominance. This martial ethos did not preclude patronage of the arts: distinctive forms of painting and architecture developed under the aegis of Rajput courts, and ] found support. Thus, the Rajputs have contributed directly and indirectly to many facets of the Indian crasis. | |||
==Definition== | |||
Rajputs are a sub-group of hindu ] varna. They have a hindu ] (an endogamus group within the ] social system). Rajputs are literally sons-of-kings. They are divided into 36 major clans, names of which are recorded in several texts including the ''Kumarpala Charita'' of Jayasimha, and '']'' of ]. | |||
==Demographics== | |||
==Origins and Geographical Presence== | |||
].]] | |||
Rajputs predominantly belong to three lineages: the ] (Solar Race), the ] (Lunar Race), and the '']'' (Fire Born). Some scholars also include ''Rishi vanshi'', ''Nag Vanshi'' and ''Vayu Vanshi'' as separate classes. | |||
The 1931 census of ] was the last to record caste affiliation in a manner that provides reliable information on Rajput demographics. Any present-day estimates are speculative; they also vary widely. These figures are of interest as they denote the approximate spread and composition of the Rajput community. | |||
The 1931 census reported a total of 10.7 million people self-describing as Rajput. Of this population, about 8.6 million people also self-described as being ], about 2.1 million as being ] and about 50,000 as being ] by religion. The ] (being approximately present-day ] and ] combined) reported the largest population of Rajputs, at 3,756,936. Next came the undivided province of ] with 2,351,650. The (then united) province of ] & ], corrosponding to the present-day states of Bihar, Orissa and ], reported a Rajput population of 1,412,440. ], which was almost co-terminus with the present-day state of ], reported a figure of 669,516. The ] reported a figure of 506,087, the ] of ] of 393,076, the ] of 388,942, the ] of 352,016, the ] of ] of 256,020, and the Western India States Agency of 227,137 Rajputs. The undivided province of ] (including present-day ] reported a figure of 156,978 Rajputs. The ]s of ] and ] reported figures of 94,893 and 88,434 respectively. | |||
Suryavanshi rajputs ruled over ], ] and ]. ], ], ], ], ] were ruled by Agnivanshi rajputs. ] and ] are from the same line which bifurcated at king yadu {{fact}} when his father banished him from becoming the king. ], ] was ruled by Chandravanshi rajputs. | |||
Rajputs typically speak whatever languages are spoken by the general population of the areas they live in. ], ], ], and dialects of these languages are the major native languages (mother tongues) of the Rajputs. | |||
===Rajput Clan Structure=== | |||
Suryavanshi trace their lineage to the Vedic Sun - Surya. Lord ] was also born in this lineage. Somvanshi to ] (the vedic deity Soma or Moon) and Agnivanshi orginated from fire. The Yaduvanshi trace there lineage to Lord ]. | |||
==Origins== | |||
Each ] is divided into many ] and each ] is further divided into many ]. For a pictorial description please see page 27 of | |||
{{main|Origin of Rajputs}} | |||
The traditional occupations of the Rajput are war and agriculture. As many scholars have pointed out, these areas lend themselves uniquely to the ingress of groups that were not formerly affiliated with those professions. The gradual accommodation of the new entrants into the social and family circle of the traditional community is the essential ''quid pro quo'' of the ] that the aspirant community essays. This phenomenon of gradual inclusion has indubitably obtained in the case of the Rajputs, with certain ] and ] dynasties being among the most recent to venture the claim of affiliation with the Rajput community. In view of this, to seek a single and common, definitive origin for every present-day Rajput is widely recognised as being an exercise in futility. We present both traditional legends and some scholarly speculations made by researchers on the origin of the Rajputs. | |||
====Legendary accounts==== | |||
Some Suryavanshi rajputs are: ]s, which are divided into these ] : ], ], ], ] etc; Guhilotes, which are subdivided into these shakha: ] (at ]), ] (at ]), ] (at ]), etc. | |||
{{main|Rajput clans}} | |||
As ]s, the Rajputs regard themselves as being descended from the ] warrior class. Legend ascribes to the Rajputs an origin stemming from certain ] deities; every Rajput must eventually belong to one of three great patrilineages, being: | |||
*the ] lineage, claiming descent from ], the ] Fire-god; | |||
*the ] lineage, claiming descent from ], the ] Sun-god; | |||
*the ] lineage, claiming descent from ], the ] Moon-god. | |||
Some scholars also count '']'', ''Rishivanshi'' and ''Vayuvanshi'' as traditional lineages. The ''Yaduvanshi'' lineage, claiming descent from the ] god ], are in fact a major sept of the ''Chandravanshi'' lineage. | |||
The aforementioned three patrilineages (''vanshas'') sub-divide into 36 main clans (''kulas''), which in turn divide into numerous branches (''shakhas'') to create the intricate ] of the Rajputs. The principle of patrilineage is staunchly adhered to in determining one's place in the system and a strong consciousness of clan and lineage is an essential part of the Rajput character. As the 1911 edition of the ] states, this tradition of common ancestry permits an indigent Rajput yeoman to consider himself as well-born as any powerful landholder of his clan, and superior to any high official of the professional classes. Authoritative listings of the 36 Rajput clans are to be found in the ''Kumārpāla Charita'' of Jayasimha and the '']'' of ]. | |||
Agnivanshi rajputs are: ], which are divided into these ]: ], ], ], ] etc. Similarly there are various shakha in ], ] and rest of the 12 clans described below. | |||
Among the legends mentioned above, the one which addresses the origin of the '']'' Rajputs is particularly interesting, not least because they were the earliest to rise to political prominence. This legend begins with the ] legend wherein the traditional '']s'' of the land were exterminated by ], an ] of ]. Later, the legend says, sage ] performed a great ''Yajna'' or fire-sacrifice, to seek from the Gods a provision for the defense of righteousness on earth. In answer to his prayer, a youth arose from the very flames of the sacrifice -- the first ''Agnivanshi'' Rajput. In some versions of the legend, ''all'' the Rajput lineages rose thus from the sacred flames. | |||
Each ] has its ], a genealogical creed, describing the essential peculiarities, religious tenets and pristine locale of the clan. It is a touchstone of affinities and guardian of the laws of intermarriage. | |||
====Scientific View==== | |||
Rathore Gotra Acharya -- ''Gautam gotra, Mardwunduni Shakha, Shukra-Acharya Guru, Garroopata Agni, Pankhini Devi''. | |||
Many scholars view the ''Agni kunda'' (fire-sacrifice) legend as suggesting, in an allegorical manner, the possibility that people who were not hitherto regarded as kshatriyas/Rajputs could come to be regarded as such after the customary fire-sacrifice based purificatory rituals. Many scholarly speculations on the origin of the Rajputs have been based on this legend. ] uses it as a basis for speculating upon a ] origin for the Rajputs. He suggests that Scythian (], ]) tribes which invaded India in the ] and disappeared into the population soon afterwards were the forbears of present-day Rajputs. Many modern historians tend to agree with this assessment, which according to some scholars, finds evidence in anthropological research.<ref></ref> | |||
These twelve of 36 ] of ] further subdivide: | |||
*],],], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]. | |||
Rest of the 24 clans are 'Eka' and do not divide further: | |||
* ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. | |||
===Myths=== | |||
One version of the story of ''Agni kula'' origins is that four warriors, Agnikul, Yadaukul, Suryakul and Odak, whose names are given to the Rajput clans, sprang from the sacred fire (]) in a ceremony performed by ] ] near ] . Sage Vashishta undertook this Yagya to develop warriors who could help the ordinary mortals against the demons. | |||
There is another myth which states Rajputs were descendants of ], the founding ] ]. | |||
Modern Historians tend to view rajputs as descendants of ] pastoral people. This theory has been sustantiated by anthropological research which has yielded compelling proofs of them being scythic.Evidence has been traced to their geneology too.Many Rajputs who call themselves of ] lineage too have been found to be of same scythic stock somewhat similar to ] following ] customs (like circumcision on 8th day) {{fact}} who like Rajputs also trace their lineage from Jadon ,nothing to do with yaduvansh of lord ] | |||
Rajputs reside mainly in ], ], ] and central ] of India. | |||
], which has a very high concentration of ], is located in northwestern ], near the ] route used by most foreign invasions of India, including the Arabs, Afghans, Turks, Mughals, and other Islamic invaders of the Middle Ages. In his ''New History of India'', ] wrote "The Rajputs were the vanguard of Hindu India in the face of the Islamic onslaught." Rajputs live in ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. | |||
==The Rajput Rule of India== | |||
==Political history== | |||
], Rajasthan, which was built by ] Rajputs]] | ], Rajasthan, which was built by ] Rajputs]] | ||
{{main|History of Rajputs}} | |||
Rajput kings are mainly remembered as warriors and as influential rulers. They also played an important role in the emergence of modern-day society in northern India. | |||
Rajput history, being a part of broader ]n history, can be classified easily into several distinct periods. | |||
===Early history=== | |||
Archaeological evidence and contemporary texts suggest that the Indian society had achieved significant prosperity during the Rajput rule. Most of the archaeological remains in several regions of the ] are from the Rajput period. | |||
The ], who ruled ] in the 6th and 7th centuries and were displaced by an Arab army led by ], are sometimes held to have been Rajputs. According to some sources, ], an Arab who invaded ] in the 8th century, also attacked ], and was defeated by ]. Certain other invasions by murauding ''"Yavvanas"'' are also recorded in this era. By this time, the appelation ''"Yavvana"'' (literally: "Ionian/Greek") was used in connection to any tribe that emerged from the west and north-west of present-day ]. These invasions may therefore have been a continuation of the usual invasions into India by warlike but less civilized tribes from the north-west, and not a reference to the Greeks or ]s. ] of ] defeated one such ''Yavvana'' invasion in the 8th century and the Pratiharas rebuffed another in the 9th century. | |||
===The Rajput period (7th-11th centuries AD)=== | |||
It was also a period of spread of literacy. Numerous inscriptions from this period have been found. A significant fraction of them are by people who were unaffiliated with the nobles, suggesting that education was spreading among the common people. The literature composed in this period is in ] and in ]s which constitutes a large segment of the classical Indian literature. The ] king ] of ] was not only a patron of scholars, but was himself a distinguished and prolific scholar. His ] deals with architecture and ] is a famous commentary on ]-]. | |||
The first Rajput kingdoms are attested to in the ] and it was in the 9th and 10th centuries that the Rajputs rose to prominence in ]. The four '']'' clans, namely, the ]s (Pariharas), ]s (Chaulukyas), ]s (Parmars) and ]s (Chahamanas), rose to prominence first. | |||
====Major kingdoms==== | |||
The intermarriage among the Rajput clans interlinked different regions of India, making it easier for the trade and scholarship to flow from one part of the country to another. | |||
'''The ]s''' established their rule over ] and ruled from ] in the 8th century. One branch of the clan established a state in nearby ], where they held sway until they were supplanted by the ]s in the 14th century. Around 816 AD, the Pratiharas of Ujjaini conquered ], from which city they ruled much of northern India for a century. They went into decline after ] invasions in the early 10th century. The Kachwahas, Chandelas and Tomaras all originate as vassals of the Pratihara kingdom. | |||
'''The ]s''' were descended from the ]s who ruled much of peninsular India between the 6th and 12th centuries. In the 10th century, a local branch of the clan established control over Gujarat and ruled a state centered around the town of Patan. They went into decline in the 13th century and were displaced by the ] and ] clans. | |||
Rajput kings were very secular in character and permitted all faiths to flourish in their domains. Rajputs practice ], ], ], ] and occasionally ] traditions; they supported Buddhists, ] and Sufi traditions as well. | |||
'''The ]s''' were near neighbours of the Solankis. They originated as feudatories of the Rashtrakutas and rose to power in the 10th century. They ruled Malwa and the area at the border between present-day Gujarat and Rajasthan. ], celebrated king of Malwa, belonged to this dynasty. In the 12th century, the Paramaras declined in power due to conflict with the Solankis and succumbed to attack from the ] in 1305. | |||
The vast majority of Rajputs practice Hinduism. There are some Rajputs who follow the ] panth, and they often intermarry with Hindu Rajputs even today. | |||
'''The ]s''' originated as feudatories of the Pratiharas and rose to power in the wake of the decline of that power. Their state was initially centered around Sambhar in present-day Rajasthan. In the 11th century, they founded the city of ] which became their capital. In the 12th century, they captured Delhi from the Tomaras. Their most famous ruler was ], who won the ] against an invading muslim army but lost the ] the following year. This loss heralded a prolonged period of muslim rule over northern India. | |||
'''Other early states:''' The '']'' and '']'' Rajputs later established independent states. The Guhilots (later known as the ]s) established the state of ] in the 8th century. This state was founded by Bappa Rawal, who ruled from ]. The ] clan established a state in present-day ]. They are credited with having founded (c.736) the city of Dhiliki, later known as ]. The ] clan ruled ] after the 10th century, occupying the fortress of ]; they later built the famous temples at ]. | |||
===Social hierarchy=== | |||
Rajputs supported ] as scholars and priests. However, Rajputs had their own family priests, known as the ]s. Some ]s of noble Rajput families would officiate themselves as priests in their Hindu temples. For example, the ] kings of ] considered themselves as the regents of the ], a manifestation of ], and serve as the high priest of the deity as well as ruler of the state. | |||
====Legacy==== | |||
The organization of ] finally crystallized in this period. Intermarriage among the Rajput clans interlinked the various regions of India, facilitating the flow of trade and scholarship. Archaeological evidence and contemporary texts suggest that Indian society achieved significant prosperity during this era. | |||
The literature composed in this period, both in ] and in the ]s, constitutes a substantial segment of classical Indian literature. The early 11th century saw the reign of the ] king ], Paramara ruler of Malwa. He was not only a patron of literature and the arts but was himself a distinguished writer. His '']'' deals with architecture and his ''Raja-Martanda'' is a famous commentary on the ]-]s. Many major monuments of northern and central India, including those at Khajuraho, date from this period. | |||
===Islamic invasions (''c.''11th-16th centuries)=== | |||
==Character== | |||
The fertile and prosperous plains of ] had always been the destination of choice for streams of invaders coming from the north-west. The last of these waves of invasions were of tribes who had previously converted to Islam. Due to geographic reasons, Rajput-ruled states suffered the brunt of aggression from various ]-]-] warlords who repeatedly invaded the subcontinent. In his ''New History of India'', ] wrote "The Rajputs were the vanguard of Hindu India in the face of the Islamic onslaught." | |||
The Rajput ethos is martial in spirit, fiercely proud, loyal and independent, and emphasizes lineage and tradition. Rajput ] is legendary, an ideal they embodied by choosing death before dishonour. Rajput warriors were often known to fight until the last man. The practice of '']'' and '']'' was followed only in rajput communities. | |||
Within 15 years of the death of the ], the caliph ] sent a sea expedition to raid ] and ] on the ] coast. Other unsuccessful raiding expeditions to ] took place in ] and ] AD. Indeed, within a hundred years after ]'s death, Muslim armies had overrun much of ] as far as the ]. However, it was not until ''c.''1000 AD that they could establish any foothold in India. | |||
===Jauhar=== | |||
When the outcome of a battle was against the Rajputs, ''jauhar'' would be committed by Rajput women and children in the night and next morning men would commit ''saka''. Brahmin priests would chant Vedic ]s and Rajput women wearing their marriage dresses, along with their young children, would embrace ] flames. | |||
In the early 11th century, ] conquered the Hindu ] kingdom in ]. His raids into northern India weakened the ] kingdom, which was drastically reduced in size and came under the control of the ]s. In 1018 AD, Mahmud sacked the city of ], seat of the ] kingdom, but withdrew immediately to Ghazni, being interested in booty rather than empire. In the ensuing chaos, the ] dynasty established a modest state centered around Kannauj, ruling for about a hundred years. They were defeated by ] in 1194 AD, when the city was sacked by the latter. | |||
===Saka=== | |||
The next morning after taking a bath, the men would wear ] and apply the ash from the ] ] ''of their wives and children'' on their foreheads and put a ] leaf in their mouth. Then the palace gates would be opened and men would ride out for complete annhilation of the enemy or themselves. Rajput men and women could not be captured alive. | |||
Meanwhile, a nearby state centered around present-day ] was ruled successively by the ] and ] clans. ], ruler of Delhi, defeated ] at the ] (1191 AD). Muhammad returned the following year and defeated Prithviraj at the ] (1192 AD). In this battle, as in many others of this era, rampant internecine conflict among Rajput kingdoms facilitated the victory of the invaders. | |||
When ]s fought against other ]s there were never any '']'' or ''saka'' because the defeated were treated with dignity. However, history records very few instances wherein a Rajput king sued for peace after a battle reversal and the Muslims initially agreed to the peace terms, only for the Rajputs, and their women and children, to be slaughtered upon surrender and once the ''pols'' or gates of their mighty fortresses were opened. One example of this is war between Puran Mal of ] and Sher Shah Suri. The opposite is true for wars between Marathas and Rajputs, where even after battle reversals, no jauhars took place in Rajasthan. | |||
], ancient home of the ] rulers of ] in ]]] | |||
] witnessed several heroic battles between Rajputs and Muslim invaders. Three different times did its womenfolk perform '']''.]] | |||
] | |||
] from ] by Rajput rulers serving as mughal officers in that province.]] | |||
====Later Rajput states==== | |||
] proved to be the last Rajput ruler of ]. The Chauhans, led by Govinda, grandson of Prithviraj, later established a small state centered around ] in present-day ]. The ] sept of the Chauhan clan later ruled ], while and ] sept of the same clan established their rule over the ] region in the mid-13th century. The Tomaras later established themselves at ], and the ruler Man Singh built the fortress which still stands there. As we have seen, Muhammad's armies brought down the Gahadvala kingdom of Kannauj in ] AD. Some surviving members of the Gahadvala dynasty are said to have refugeed to the western desert, formed the ] clan, and later founded the state of ]. The ] clan came to rule ] (later ]) with their capital at ]. | |||
Other relocations surmised to have occurred in this period include the emigration of Rajput clans to the ]s. The ] clan, the Chauhans of Chamba and certain Rajput clans of ] are counted among this number. | |||
==Rajput Armies== | |||
Predominantly consisted of cavalry. They bred high quality horses, such as ] and ]. Rajputs fought with cocked wrist and rarely used the tip of the sword to inflict a wound. Sirohi sword was very well liked by rajputs. | |||
====Conflict with the Sultanate==== | |||
The ] was founded by ], Muhammad of Ghor's successor, in the early 13th century. Sultan ] (1296-1316) conquered ] (1297), ] (1305), ] (1301), ] (1303) and ] (1311), all after long sieges and fierce resistance from their Rajput defenders. | |||
'''First Jauhar:''' In particular, the siege of Chittor (1303), its brave defence by the ]s, the saga of ] and the '']'' she led are the stuff of immortal legend. This incident has had a defining impact upon the Rajput character and is detailed in a succeeding section. | |||
Ala-ud-din Khilji delegated the administration of the newly conquered areas to his principal Rajput collaborator, Maldeo Songara, ruler of ]; the latter was soon displaced by his son-in-law ], a scion of the lately displaced ] clan, who re-established the state of ] ''c.''1326 AD. Mewar was to emerge as a leading Rajput state, after ] expanded his kingdom at the expense of the sultanates of ] and ]. | |||
==Rajputs and Invasions of India== | |||
The Rajputs suffered the brunt of the aggression from various ]-]-] warlords who repeatedly invaded the Indian subcontinent, then known as ]. Hindustan was one of the most economically prosperous regions in the world till 18-th century and had grabbed the attention of several neighbouring ] kingdoms. | |||
===Mughal era (16th-18th c.)=== | |||
===Organization of Indian kingdoms during invasions=== | |||
The Delhi sultanate was extinguished when ] defeated ] at the ] in ]. ], ruler of Mewar, rallied an army to challenge Babur. He was betrayed by one of his Rajput generals, and was defeated by ] at the ] on ], ]. However, it was not until the reign of ] that the structure of relations between the Mughal imperium and the Rajput states took definitive shape. | |||
] Agency and Ajmer-Merwara province, 1909]] | |||
] describes in Chapter X of his book, ''The Indian Empire, Its People, History And Products'', the organization of Indian kings and how they fought these invaders. | |||
'''Second Jauhar:''' Rana Sanga died soon after the battle of Khanua; shortly afterwards, Mewar came under the regency of his widow, Rani Karmavati. The kingdom was menaced by Bahadur Shah, ruler of Gujarat. According to one romantic legend of dubious veracity, Karmavati importuned the assistance of ], son of her late husband's foe. The help arrived, but too late; Chittor as reduced by Bahadur Shah. This is the occasion for the second of the three '']s'' performed at Chittor. Karmavati led the ladies of the citadel into death by fire, while the menfolk sallied out to meet the besieging Muslim army in a hopeless fight to the death. | |||
:Within a hundred years after his (Muhammad's) death, his followers had invaded the countries of ] as far as the ]. Here there progress was stayed and Islam had to consolidate itself during three more centuries before it grew strong enough to grasp the rich prize of ]. But almost from first the Arabs had fixed eager eyes upon that wealthy country. Fifteen years after the death of prophet, Usman sent a sea expedition to ] and ] on the ] coast (] ? AD). Other raids towards ] took place in ] and ] with no results. | |||
====Mughal-Rajput alliance==== | |||
:The armies of Islam had carried the crescent from the ] westwards, through ], ] and ], to distant ] and ], before they obtained a foothold in ]. This long delay was due, not only to the daring of individual tribes, such as ] Rajputs, just mentioned but to the military organization of the ] Kingdoms. | |||
Babur's son ] was an ineffectual ruler who perforce spend long periods in exile. His son was made of a different mettle; ] consolidated his inheritence and expanded what had been the "Delhi sultanate" into a wide empire. A main factor in this success was indubitably his co-option of native Rajput chiefs into his empire-building project; his reign countenanced, for the first time, the involvement of ]s in the affairs of the empire. The Rajput chiefs collaborated with alacrity, an alliance cemented by marriage, with numerous Rajput noblewomen being wed to mughal grandees. The Kachwahas were the first to give a daughter to Akbar; they pioneered a trend that soon turned pervasive and played no small role in extending Rajput influence across the ], from ] to ] to the ]. Indeed, two successive mughal emperors, ] and ], were born to Rajput mothers. | |||
Rajput chiefs served as mughal officers and administrators across the mughal empire and enjoyed much influence in the government. In this period, the ''aristocratic'' image of the Rajputs can be said to have finally crystallized; consequently, caste-divisions became rigid. The trend of political relations between Rajput states and the central power was the precursor for similar relations between them and the British. | |||
:Each of these groups of kingdoms, alike in the north and in the south, had a certain power of coherence to oppose to a foreign invader; while the large number of groups and units rendered conquest a very tedious process. For even when the overlord or central authority was vanquished, the separate units had to be defeated in detail, and each state supplied a nucleus for subsequent revolt. We have seen how the brilliant attempt in ], to found a lasting Muhammedan dynasty in ], failed. Three centuries later, the utmost efforts of two great Musalman invaders (''Mahmud of Ghazni and Mohammed Ghori'') from the north-west only succeeded in annexing a small portion of the frontier ] Province between ] and ] A.D. The ] power in ] was not completely broken till the battle of ] in ]; and within a hundred years, in ], the great Hindu revival had commenced which under the form of Maratha confederacy, was destined to break up the Mughal Empire in India. That Empire, even in the north of India, had only been consolidated by Akbar's policy of incorporating Hindu chiefs into his government(]-]). Up to Akbar's time, and even during the earlier years of his reign a series of Rajput wars had challenged the Muhammadan supremacy. In less than two centuries after his death, the succesor of Akbar was a puppet in the hand of the ] ]s at ]. | |||
] of ],<br> immortal Rajput hero]] | |||
====Rana Pratap==== | |||
'''Third Jauhar:''' However, these relations were not universally approbated. ], which justly enjoys a unique position in the Rajput mind, held out and valiantly gave battle to Akbar. After a brave struggle, Mewar's chief citadel of ] finally fell to Akbar in ]. The third (and last) ''Jauhar'' of Chittor transpired on this occasion. When the fall of the citadel became imminent, the ladies of the fort committed collective self-immolation and the men sallied out of the fort to meet the invading muslim army in a hopeless fight to an honourable death. | |||
Prior to this event, Mewar's ruler, Udai Singh, had retired to the nearby hills; he was succeeded while in exile by his son ] as head of the ] clan. Even in exile, the Sisodias did not rest; they harassed the mughal administrators of the land enough to cause them to make accommodatory overtures. ], a present-day Rajput icon, rebuffed every such overtures of friendship from Akbar, and rallied an army to meet the mughal forces. He was defeated at the battle of ] on ], ] and was forced to withdraw to the ] ranges. However, he carried out a relentless guerilla struggle from his hideout in those hills, and never gave in to the mughal power. After Pratap's death, his son Amar Singh continued the struggle for some time, but finally entered into alliance with the mughals. He thus regained control of his state as a vassal of the mughals. | |||
:The popular notion that ] fell an easy prey to the Musalmans is opposed to the historical facts. Muhammadan rule in ] consists of a series of invasions and partial conquests, during eleven centuries, from Usman's raid, ''circ''.647, to Ahmad Shah's tempest of invasion in ] A.D. | |||
The Sisodias rulers of Mewar were famously the last Rajput dynasty to enter into alliance with the Mughals. The Rajput states thereafter remained loyal to the mughal empire for over two centuries, until it was supplanted by the ]. Indeed, even as late as in the early 19th century, Rajput courts rarely failed to formally affirm their loyalty to the (by now entirely powerless) mughal emperor in all their official ''communiques'' and documents. | |||
:At no time was Islam triumphant throughout the whole of ]. ] dynasties always ruled over large areas. At the height of the Muhammadan power, the ] princes paid tribute, and sent agents to the Imperial court. But even this modified supremacy of ] lasted for little over a century (1578-1707). Before the end of that brief period the ]s had begun the work of reconquest. The native chivalry of ] was closing in upon ] from the south; the religious confederation of the ]s was growing into a military power on the north-west. The ]s had combined the fighting powers of the low-castes with the statesmen ship of the ]s, and were subjecting the Muhammadan kingdoms throughout all ] to tribute. So far as can now be estimated, the advance of the English power at the beginning of the present century alone saved the Mughal Empire from passing to the ]s. | |||
===Maratha and British suzerainty (18th-20th c.)=== | |||
===Partial list of Rajputs who fought the invaders=== | |||
The ]s of the ] rose to power in the 18th century. They conquered the major portion of India during this period, including the Rajput states of central and western India. Jodhpur was conquered by ], who annexed the fort and town of ] and levied a tribute of 60,000 rupees. James Tod, whose personal observation pertains to this period, records that internecine disputes, succession wars and the relentless exaction of levies by the Marathas left the Rajput states immiserated, and that the Rajput states repeatedly petitioned the ] administration for protection. After the ] (1817-1818), 18 states in the ] region, of which 15 were ruled by Rajputs, entered into "subsidiary alliance" with the ] and became ]s under the ]. The British took direct control of Ajmer, which became the province of ]. A vast number of other Rajput states in central and western India made a similar transition. Most od them were placed under the authority of the ] and the various states' agencies of ]. | |||
The British colonial officials in general were very impressed by the military qualities of the Rajputs. In his ''Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan'' ] writes: | |||
====] ]==== | |||
:''"What nation on earth could have maintained the semblance of civilization, the spirit or the customs of their forefathers, during so many centuries of overwhelming depression, but one of such singular character as the Rajpoot? . . . Rajast’han exhibits the sole example in the history of mankind, of a people withstanding every outrage barbarity could inflict, or human nature sustain, from a foe whose religion commands annihilation; and bent to the earth, yet rising buoyant from the pressure, and making calamity a whetstone to courage. . . . Not an iota of their religion or customs have they lost. . . ".'' | |||
] fort in Rajasthan was the site of several battles between the Rajputs and the Islamic invaders.]] | |||
When India gained its independence in 1947, the Rajput states acceded unto the ]. They were all merged into the ] before 1950. | |||
Muslims started attacking India within a few decades of the birth of Islam. For a few hundred years they had no success. ] was able to defeat ] in ] but was routed by ]. ] attacked ], which was ruled by ] Rajputs, via ]. Bappa, of ] dynasty, was a commander in Mori army and so was Dahir's son. Bappa defeated and pursued ] through ] and back to ]. After this resounding defeat of the caliphate at the hands of Bappa, for next few hundred years there were no more Islamic incursions into India. (note Muslim historians rarely recorded the defeats of their kings) {{ref|bappa}} | |||
==Culture and ethos== | |||
Then ] started his raids and was successful in looting ]. | |||
The Rajput ethos is martial in spirit, fiercely proud and independent, and emphasizes lineage and tradition. Rajput patriotism is legendary, an ideal they embodied with a sometimes fanatical zeal, often choosing death before dishonour. Rajput warriors were often known to fight until the last man. | |||
All recorded instances of ] have featured Rajput defenders of a fort, resisting the invasion of a muslim force. On several occasions when defeat in such an engagement became certain, the Rajput defenders of the fort scripted a final act of heroism that rendered the incident an immortal inspiration and afforded the invaders only an exceedingly hollow, inglorious victory. In such incidents, the ladies of the fort would commit collective self-immolation. Wearing their wedding dresses, and holding their young children by the hand, the ladies would commit their chastity to the flames of a massive, collective pyre, thereby escaping molestation and dishonour at the hands of the invading army. As the memorial of their herioc act, the ladies would leave only the imprint of the palm of their right hands on wet clay, which have become objects of veneration. This immolation would occur during the night, to the accompaniment of Vedic chants. Early the next morning, after taking a bath, the men would wear saffron-coloured garments, apply the ash from the pyres of their wives and children on their foreheads and put a ] leaf in their mouth. Then the gates would be opened and men would ride out for one final, heroic, hopeless battle, dying gloriously on the field of honour. The historic fort of Chittor, seat of the ] kingdom of ], was the site of the three most famous ''Jauhars'' recorded in history. | |||
====] ]==== | |||
] attacked ] multiple times. First time he was routed in present day ] by Rajputs. ]-II was not even a teen yet and his mother organized the defences of ]. Battle was fought at ] near ] and ] was resoundingly defeated. After this defeat he never entered ] through ]. In first battle of ] in ] ] captured ] and ] begged for his life. ] allowed him to go despite his generals asking him not to do so. Following year ] came again. ] advanced with his army and sent a letter to ]. In this letter ] was asked to return as he had been defeated the previous year and was spared his life. ] replied that he was in ] on the orders of his brother, Ghiasuddin, and that he could only retreat after he got a word from his brother. This letter was sent in the evening and ] moved his camp back a few kilometers. On receiving this letter and seeing ] move his camp back ] assumed that ] was not interested in fighting. ] also knew that ] did not fight in the night and only started fighting after sun had come up. (This is an ancient ] practice e.g ] was also fought mostly in day time). He attacked in the early morning hours when ] and his army were sleeping and was able to win this war. {{ref|chauhan}} | |||
The Rajput lifestyle was designed to foster a martial spirit. Tod (1829) describes at length the bond between the Rajputs and their swords. The double-edged scimitar known as the ''khanda'' was a popular weapon among the Rajputs of that era. On special occasions, a primary chief would break up a meeting of his vassal chiefs with ''khanda nariyal,'' the distribution of daggars and coconuts (page-453). The ''Karga Shapna'' ritual, performed during the annual ] festival, was another affirmation of the Rajput's reverence for his sword. | |||
====] ]==== | |||
] | |||
]'s descendant, ] ruled ]. ] was ruled by another branch of ]s, the ]s. ] usurped ] from his father-in-law, ], by killing him in cold blood. In ] ]'s ] general Ulugh Khan sought to quell ] resistance in ] and besieged ] and sacked the temple at ]. Ulugh Khan had broken the ] of ] and was carrying it back to ]. ], ruler of ], attacked and defeated Ulugh Khan. His son ] and ] ] were the generals who commandeered Kanhad Dev's army. They captured the fragments of the ]. ] had the ] washed in ]jal and had the fragments placed at various ] ]s around ]. One of ]'s generals was a neo-Muslim, Muhammad Shah, who had helped ]. This general later went and stayed with ] in ]. ] wanted him dead, and asked ] to hand him over. ] replied that he knows how to draw his sword, and anyone who has taken shelter in his fort would not be turned over. ] did not consider ] king of ]. ] attacked ] in ], but his armies were defeated. He finally came himself in 1301, and there was a long siege. ] was very well prepared. When the fort did not fall after repeated bloody skirmishes ] resorted to diplomacy. ] was very suspicious but he heeded to his councillors who told him that sword is not always the best recourse. Ratipal and Ranmal, who were close confidants of ], were sent to the ] camp. Ranmal's father was hung by ] for treachery and his property was confiscated. Ranmal earned the trust of ] by being brave in battles that ] fought but perfidy was in his blood. ] bribed these two generals of ]'s army and consequently ] fell. | |||
By the late 19th century, there was a shift from an emphasis on questions regarding the political relations amongst the Rajputs to a concern with kinship (Kasturi 2002:2). According to Harlan (1992:27), many Rajputs of Rajasthan are nostalgic about their past and keenly conscious of their genealogy, emphasizing a Rajput ethos that is martial in spirit, with a fierce pride in lineage and tradition. These are indeed the timeless values of the Rajput community, as the ] (1911 edition) affirms in its resume of the contemporary social values of the community: | |||
====],],] ]==== | |||
:''The tradition of common ancestry permits a poor Rajput yeoman to consider himself as well born as any powerful landholder of his clan, and superior to any high official of the professional classes. No race in India can boast of finer feats of arms or brighter deeds of chivalry, and they form one of the main recruiting fields for the Indian army of the day. They consider any occupation other than that of arms or government derogatory to their dignity, and consequently during the long period of peace which has followed the establishment of the British rule in India, they have been content to stay idle at home instead of taking up any of the other professions in which they might have come to the front.'' | |||
] | |||
] wanted to win ] because ]s of ] never accepted the rule of Islam. Another reason was ]. He laid a siege but ] would not fall. Then he requested ], husband of ], that if he is allowed a glimpse of Rani he would leave. By this time the situation inside the fort was getting bad. Rawal discussed this with his advisers and they agreed that they can show Padmini's face in a mirror to the ]. The meeting took place and afterwards out of courtesy when Ratan Singh was walking ] out of the palace, ]'s men captured ]. ] sent a message to the fort that Rawal can be spared by exchanging ]. Padmini discussed this with ], her maternal uncle, who was a ] rajput. Gora told her not to worry and that he would go and bring back ]. Padmini's nephew ] who was just sixteen also assured her. A message was sent from the fort to ] that Padmini would come with 700 of her servants in "palanquins" (palki in ]) and that no Muslim soldier should peek inside the palki to outrage the modesty of the women. Letter also said that before ] meets ] she would like to talk to Rawal. Khilji agreed. All the palki's had the best rajput warriors with two swords each. When Padmini's palki, which was occupied by Gora, reached Rawal's tent he asked Rawal to mount the horse and go back to the fort. Then Gora gave a signal and every rajput came out of the palki and attacked the Muslims who were cut to pieces. ] reached ]'s tent and was about to kill the sultan when ] moved his concubine in front of himself. Gora, being a rajput could not kill an innocent women and these few seconds were enough for ]'s guards to kill Gora from behind. | |||
==Cognate communities== | |||
====] ]==== | |||
The mainstream Rajput community comprises of ]s belonging to the ] caste and to a specific set of 36 clans. Several other communities identify themselves as being Rajput, typically claiming to be of partial Rajput descent. They are found both in the Hindu community and in other religious groups. | |||
], in ] ]]] | |||
After Ratan Singh's death his successor ] tried to capture ] and fought a battle with Tughlaq near ]. He died along with his son Ari. His second son Ajay was severely wounded but was taken away from the battlefield by other soldiers and survived. Ajay was not a powerful ruler and his sons were likewise. Ajay knew that Ari had a son ] and he called ] to come to him. ], along with his mother came to see his uncle. Ajay said that he had grown weak and a dacoit, Munja Balicha, was wreaking havoc in Rana Ajay's domain. ] vowed that he would take care of Munja. ] took seven warriors with him and set out to finish Munja. ] at this stage was just a teenager. Munja was tracked. When Munja was riding with his band to plunder a village, ] stood in his way on his white steed. Munja asked him to leave the way or die. ] challenged him to a duel and seeing that Hammir was just a teenager Munja readily agreed. ] killed Munja and brought his head and put it at Rana Ajay's feet and told his uncle that Munja will never be a problem again. Rana Ajay realized Hammir should be the ruler and he coronated Hammir as the new ruler of ]. Ajay's sons were unhappy with this and decided to move to ]. Do note that ] was called ] at this time as ] had renamed it after his son and at Hammir's coronation was ruled by ]. Hammir captured ]. ] became very unhappy and launched a massive campaign against Hammir which he led himself. Hammir knew as soon as he captured ] that ] would attack him. He rallied all nearby rajput states to join him and they did. Battle was fought and ] was badly defeated and captured. After he paid a hefty fees and surrendered all of ]'s territory he was let go. After this defeat ] was never attacked by ]. | |||
'''Cognate Hindu communities:''' Certain Hindu communities claim partial descent from the Rajput community while holding social identities that set them apart from the main communion. The ] ] of the ] hills are among these. Many Rajputs perforce fled to the hills at various points in history, where they are said to have occasionally intermarried with the ]s; the Garasia community claim to be descended from such intermarriage. Some sections of the ] scheduled tribe of ] ascribe to themselves a similar heritage, as do the ] community of nomadic blacksmiths. Certain specific sections of the ] and ] communities also hold themselves to be of part-Rajput descent. | |||
====] ]==== | |||
]]] | |||
'''Sikh Rajputs:''' The census of 1931 recorded the existence of 50,000 people who claimed to be both Rajput and ]. Occasional instances of inter-marriage between them and Hindu Rajputs are recorded. | |||
Later Rana Kumbha repeatedly defeated sultans of ] and ] and built 32 forts in ]. Even the combined armies of sultans of Malwa and Gujarat could not beat Kumbha. To commemorate his victory over these Muslim rulers of Malwa and Gujarat, Maharana Kumbha built the victory tower in 1440 A.D. The tower has nine-stories and is covered with exquisite sculputres of ] Gods and Godesses depicting episodes from ] and ]. | |||
'''Muslim Rajputs:''' The census of 1931 recorded a population of 2.1 million Muslim Rajputs in ], concentrated primarily in ] and the ] with smaller numbers in other places. In Panjab, ], and ], they made up the majority of those claiming to be Rajput. The great majority of Muslim Rajputs today live in ]. Detailed information on the community is available at the ] page. | |||
====] ]==== | |||
In Kumbha's lineage was ] or Sanga. ], ruler of ], was defeated by Man Singh ] of ] but being a ] ], Man Singh out of magnanimity let Ibrahim go back to Delhi. Man Singh's descendants fought at ] along with ] against ] and showed exemplary bravery. Lodi was defeated by ] later. Now ] was having sleepless nights because of ]. ] sent about 1500 choice cavalry to attack ]. These were butchered by ]'s rajputs. ] wanted to discuss peace terms. For discussions ] sent his general ] (Shiladitya). ] won this general by promising him independent kingdom. ] came back and reported that ] does not want peace and he wants to fight. Fight started and ]'s army was being knocked out of the field and victory was certain for ]. At this juncture ] and his army just left the field and this tilted the war in favor of ] and he won. | |||
The Muslim Rajputs trace their lineages back to Hindu Rajputs who converted to Islam. Kasturi (2002:2) affirms that one or more branches in a stratified clan lineage could indeed be Muslim. However, there is no inter-marriage or other clan relations between Muslim and Non-Muslim Rajputs; however, Muslim Rajputs may intermarry with Muslims of other communities. Nevertheless, Muslim Rajputs usually marry amongst themselves, and only seldom depart from the custom of endogamy. The Thukrai community of ] district in ], ] are among those noted for maintaining a strict tradition of Muslim Rajput endogamy.<ref> "Marginal Muslim Communities In India", edited by M.K.A.Siddiqui (2004)</ref> Prominent Muslim Rajput personalities include ] ], former Chief of Staff, ]; General ], Pakistani military commander; ], British Olympic silver medalist for boxing and Rana Sehar Ali-Noor. | |||
====] ]==== | |||
], Home of ] rulers of (], ])]] | |||
], ]'s son was defeated by ], a ]. ] was forced to leave ] and he took refuge with ] king of ]. ] became ruler of ]. The ] of ] had not yet recovered from ]'s treacherous defeat. In ] the ]s were becoming very powerful. The ] king ] had extended his territory to within a couple of hundred kilometers of ]. ] attacked ]. ] came with a force of 40 thousand and ] had 60 thousand. In the evening ] sent forged letters to ]'s camp. In these letters it was stated that few generals from ]'s army were buying arms from ]'s army. This caused great consternation in ] who thought there is treachery and that some of his generals had crossed over to ]. ] left with 20 thousand men. In reality there was no treachery. Later when ]'s generals Kumpa (his progeny are ] ]s) and Jaita (his progeny are ] ]s) found out what happened they did not loose cool and decided they would not leave the field even though they just had 20 thousand men and had to face 60 thousand ]s of ]. Finally battle of ] was fought and ] was shocked by what he saw. ]'s top generals lost there lives and his army suffered heavy losses. After this ] commented that "for a few grains of ] ]] he had almost lost the entire kingdom of ]". It is a moot point now but had ] not retreated because of the fake letter ]s/Rajputs would have defeated ]. In my bhoomi (Rajasthan) ]s are considered the most stubborn, ]s the most brave and ]s the invincible warriors on the battlefield (Ranbanka ]). | |||
==Famous Rajput people== | |||
====] ]==== | |||
The Rajputs have contributed to many facets of Indian life, both historically and in the modern age. A few prominent Rajputs are mentioned below: | |||
] of Udaipur]] | |||
'''Historical heroes''' | |||
]'s son ] was born in the palace of a ] king, at ], who had given ] shelter when he was being pursued by ]. ] realized that he can never subdue Rajputs and become sole ruler of ]. He decided to pursue diplomacy and was able to convince the ] Rajput rulers of ](modern day ]) about a matrimonial alliance. King of ] agreed and Maan Kunwar became ]'s queen and the mother of Prince ], who later became the ] emperor ]. Soon other Rajput kingdoms in ] also gave their daughters to ]. This was the darkest period in the history of Rajputs. | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
'''Modern age''' | |||
Only two kings remained against this. The ]s of ] and ]s of ]. ] are ]s. Finally ] of ] and ] went and met ] that he should become friends with ]. ] some how agreed but one of his conditions of friendship was that no daughter of ]s would ever be asked to marry ]s and ] agreed. Surjan was very saddened by this friendship with ] and the fact that he could not help ] against ]. He felt so ashamed that he moved his residence to ] and made sure that ] in the holy city had no problems at the hands of Muslims. So there remained just the house of ] the sole bearer of Rajput pride in the face of immense opposition from ] as well as other rajputs who had sold there souls essentially to mughals by giving there daughters. | |||
* ], Prime Minister of India (Dec.2, 1989-Nov.10, 1990) | |||
* ], Prime Minister of India (Nov.10, 1990-June 21, 1991) | |||
], the ] ruler of ], passed a law in his state that none of his followers will intermarry with Rajputs who have given their daughters to Muslims. This rule was followed by his loyal band of Rajputs, which included ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ]s, ] and ]s. ] never accepted ] as ruler of ], and fought ] all his life. ] first tried diplomacy to win over ] but nothing worked. ] just said he has no intention to fight with ] but he cannot bow down to ] and accept him as the ruler. Some scholars argue that there is some chance that ] could have become friends with ] but in the siege of ] when ] killed 30,000 civilian, unarmed residents of ], because they refused to convert to ], left a lasting impression on ]'s mind and he decided he cannot bow to such an unjust and cruel human being as ] was. (People should note that when ] Kings fought with each other unarmed civilians were never killed in the loosing king's territory). | |||
* ], sometime leader of opposition, ] | |||
* ], Vice-president of India. | |||
Finally ] attacked ] at ]. Akbar's general was Man Singh ] of ], leading an army of 40 thousand men. ] had about 8 thousand men and some ] warriors. One of ]'s generals was Hakim Khan Sur, who was from the line of ], a ]. ]s are the only faction of Muslims that Rajputs do not mind befriending | |||
* ], olympic silver medalist | |||
because a ] would rather give his life then his word. During the first attack ]'s army routed the ] and ] ran for there life. ] decided to kill Man Singh, and ]'s horse ] put his front feet on the trunk of the elephant that Man Singh was riding and ] threw his lance. Man Singh ducked, and the elephant driver was killed. Finally the numerical superiority of the ] army was too much and the battle ended in a stalemate. When ] army entered the nearby town of ] they were so mortified that ] would attack them again that no one would venture out of the camp for months. They ran out of food and conditions were just miserable in the ] camp. They killed there own horses and ate them to survive. Finally help arrived many months later. ] was very unhappy with his generals and his army and he refused to see his generals for months. | |||
Akbar kept sending expedition after expedition against ] but never succeeded. He lost lot of money and men in trying to defeat ]. For 30 years Pratap remained ahead of ] and in last ten years of his life was able to free most of his kingdom. The only fort ] could not recover was ] and that saddened him a lot. His son, ], won that fort after ]'s death. | |||
It is said that somebody told ] that ] wanted to accept ] as the king. ] was very happy to hear this. One of ]'s general was Prthviraj ] who was a very good poet. He told ] this is a lie (incidentally Prithviraj's mother and ]'s mother were real sisters. ] and Prithviraj played together as kids in there maternal grandfather, Akshay Raj ]'s home who was a ] rajput). Prithviraj wrote this letter to ]: | |||
:The hopes of the ] rest on the ] yet the ] forsakes them. But for ], all would be placed on the same level by ]; for our chiefs have lost their valour and our females their honour. ] is the broker in the market of our race; he has purchased all but the son of Udai (Singh II of ]); he is beyond his price. What true Rajput would part with honour for nine days (nauroza); yet how many have bartered it away? Will ] come to this market ...? Though ] (an affectionate name for ]) has squandered away wealth (on warfare), yet he has preserved this treasure. Despair has driven man to this market, to witness their dishonour: from such infamy the descendant of ] alone has been preserved. The world asks, from where does the concealed aid of ]emanate? None but the soul of manliness and his sword .. The broker in the market of men (]) will one day be surpassed; he cannot live forever. Then will our race come to ], for the seed of the Rajput to sow in our desolate lands. To him all look for its preservation, that its purity may again become resplendent. It is as much impossible for me to believe that ] has called ] his emperor as to see the sun rising in the west. Tell me where do I stand? Shall I use my sword on my neck or shall I continue my proud bearing? | |||
Pratap replied to him: | |||
:By my god ], ] would call the emperor ] alone and the sun would rise in the east. You may continue your proud bearing as long as ]'s sword dangles on the ] head. ] would be guilty of ]'s blood, if he was to tolerate ]. you would have the better of it, no doubt Prithviraj, in this wordy quarrel. | |||
Prithviraj was overjoyed on getting this letter. | |||
]'s son, Amar Singh, fought 17 wars with the ]s but he finally accepted them as rulers. At this time a large chunk of ]'s band of loyal Rajputs became disillusioned by the surrender and left ]. This group included ]s, ] ]s, ]s, ]s, ] and ]s. They are called "Rors" and settled mostly in ], with some in ]. Until today they do not intermarry with other Rajputs but "] permitting" with other Rors only. | |||
====]==== | |||
] rulers of ]]] | |||
In the Battle of ], ] opposed ]. The battle was fought on 15th April ], fifteen miles from ]. Jaswant could have attacked ] but he allowed Murad's armies to join ]. He was desirous of beating both mughal princes at once. This delay allowed ] to win over the mughal general, Kasim Khan, who was sent by ] to help ]. Kasim Khan defected as soon as the war started but 30,0000 ]s of ] decided that they would not leave the field. Some prominent generals in Maharaja's army were Mukund Singh ] of ] and ], Dayal Das ], Arjun ] of Rajgarh in ] province and Ratan Singh ] of ]. ] attacked both Aurangzeb and Murad and they barely escaped. According to ] in ''Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan:'' | |||
==See also== | |||
''"Ten thousand Muslims fell in the onset, which cost seventeen hundred ]s, besides ]s, ]s, Gaurs, and some of every clan of Rajwarra. ] and ] only escaped because their days were not yet numbered. Notwithstanding the immense superiority of the imperial princes, aided by numerous artillery served by Frenchmen, night alone put a stop to the contest of science, numbers, and artillery, against ] courage."'' | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==External links== | |||
Finally the unequal contest ended and Aurangzeb named the place of victory Fatehabad. In this battle ] changed four horses and lost about half a dozen swords (they broke due to intense fighting) and he finally fell down half dead. Maharaja ordered him to be carried away. After his wounds healed he promptly rejoined Maharaja's army. ] further writes in ''Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan:'' | |||
* ], Sixth Edition; 2005 | |||
* ]; 1911 | |||
* | |||
==Notes== | |||
''"], even in the moment of battle, worshipped the rising sun, and they sealed there faith in there blood; and none more liberally than the brave ]s of ] and ]. . . The annals of no nation on earth can furnish such an example, as an entire family, six royal brothers of ], stretched on the field, and all but one in death. Of all the deeds of heroism performed on this day, those of Ratan Singh ] of ], by universal consent, are pre-eminent, and are wreathed into immortal rhyme by the bard in the Raso Rao Ratan."'' | |||
<references/> | |||
==References== | |||
====] ]==== | |||
<!--works referred to in the article body; general reading suggestions go to the next section--> | |||
]]] | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
When ] ] died he had no son and this gave ] a chance to appoint a ] as the ruler of ]. This upset ] Rajputs a lot. Two of ]'s queens were pregnant when he died. One queen gave birth to ] and other to Dalathamban. After Ajit's birth, ] generals, chief among them was ] (a ] ]) went to ] along with the queens and the infants, and asked ] that crown of ] should be given to ]. ] was very cunning and he had no intention of handing over the throne of ]. He suggested that Ajit should grow up in his ] but internally he wanted to kill them all. | |||
| Surname1 = Harlan | |||
] was founded by the ] clan of Rajputs.]] ] sensed this and they smuggled ] out of ] to the outskirts of the city. When ] army came to capture them in ], ] and his men attacked the ] and started riding out of ]. Raghunandan ] and others soaked the streets of ] in crimson by flowing the blood of ] pursuers. There were about three hundred Rajputs with ] and there were thousands of pursuing ]. Every so often 15 - 20 Rajputs would fall behind attack the ] pursuers and in the process get themselves killed but it allowed the forward party to create some distance between Ajit and the ]s. This continued till the evening by which time the ]s had given up and ] was left with just seven men out of three hundred he started with and reached ] along with Ajit Singh. | |||
| Given1 = Lindsey | |||
] was founded by the ] clan of Rajputs.]] | |||
| Year = 1992 | |||
Thereby started the 30 year Rajput rebellion against Aurangzeb. ] and ] forces combined together and almost killed ] when he was trapped in the mountains of ] but the ] king out of magnanimity allowed ] to escape. | |||
| Title = Religion and Rajput Women: The Ethic of Protection in Contemporary Narratives. | |||
| Publisher = University of California Press | |||
All the ]s were plundered by ]s and they started looting various treasuries of ] and ]. To crush them ] sent many expeditions but no success. These expeditions and drying up of revenue from trade routes running through ] had severe effect on his resources. In addition the lion of ], ], had freed almost all of ] and was at constant war with ]. ] had some Rajput ancestry. | |||
| ID = ISBN 0520073398 | |||
}} . | |||
*Kasturi, Malavika, '' Embattled Identities Rajput Lineages'', Oxford University Press (2002) ISBN 01956-5787-x | |||
*M K A Siddiqui (ed.), ''Marginal Muslim Communities In India'', Institute of Objective Studies, New Delhi (2004) | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Tod | |||
| Given1 = James | |||
| Surname2 = Crooke | |||
| Given2 = William (Editor) | |||
| Year = 1994 | |||
| Title = Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan (2 vols.). | |||
| Publisher = Trans-Atl | |||
| ID = ISBN 8170691281 | |||
| Comment = The way Surjan Hada was befriended by Man Singh and Akbar and the conditions that Surjan laid down for this friendship are chronicled. Surjan's leaving ] and living in ] because of this friendship is also documented by ] in this book. Treachery against Rana Sanga is also described in this book. (Treachery against Rana Sanga: Annals of Mewar, Chapter IX Vol-I: Pages 243-246. Surjan Hada: Page 381-385 volume II). | |||
}}. | |||
*W.W. Hunter, ''The Indian empire, its people, history and products.'' First published: London, Trubner & Co., Ludgate Hill, 1886. ISBN 81-206-1581-6. | |||
*{{1911}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
Finally, on his death-bed ] complained that his life had been a complete failure. He was the sole reason for Mughal empire's crumbling. His war campaigns had practically left the treasury dry for his progeny. | |||
Baron De Boigne payed tribute to rajput (rathaura) valor in his memoirs, which were published by his son in 18th century. De Boigne fought the rathaurs, as part of Mahadaji Scindia's army at Tonga, Lalsot and Medta. | |||
==Protection of ]== | |||
A point to note here is that lot of ] and some ] historians think that ]/]s did not do conversion of ]s by sword. The argument they give is that there are so many ]s still today in ]. This is completely wrong because most ] rulers in ] tried to convert as many as they could but it was the strength of Rajput sword and later ],] swords that kept Hinduism alive in ]. If there were no ]s, ]s , ]s in ], then ] would be just like ], ], ], or ] in terms of religion of the population. | |||
The preservance of ] in India by the Rajput sword against the entire might of ] rulers is the most glorious achievement by a race in the annals of ] and every one should know this fact, more so ]s and most definitely each and every Rajput. | |||
In his ''Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan'' ] wrote: | |||
:"What nation on earth could have maintained the semblance of civilization, the spirit or the customs of their forefathers, during so many centuries of overwhelming depression, but one of such singular character as the Rajpoot? . . . Rajast’han exhibits the sole example in the history of mankind, of a people withstanding every outrage barbarity could inflict, or human nature sustain, from a foe whose religion commands annihilation; and bent to the earth, yet rising buoyant from the pressure, and making calamity a whetstone to courage. . . . Not an iota of their religion or customs have they lost. . . ". | |||
==Prominent Rajput clans & their main centers== | |||
{{col-begin}} | |||
{{col-3}} | |||
<div style="font-size: 75%"> | |||
* ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
*** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ]/] | |||
** ]: ]/] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ]: ]/] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
** ]: ]/] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ]/]/]/] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
*** ] | |||
</div> | |||
{{col-2}} | |||
<div style="font-size: 75%"> | |||
* ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
*** ]: ] | |||
*** ]: ]/] | |||
*** ]: ] | |||
*** ]: ] | |||
*** ] | |||
** ]: Anahilawad (Patan) ] | |||
*** ] | |||
** ], ] (Parmar): ]/] | |||
***] | |||
***] | |||
***] | |||
** ] (Parihara): ], ],],] | |||
***] | |||
***] | |||
***] | |||
</div> | |||
{{col-3}} | |||
<div style="font-size: 75%"> | |||
* ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ]/]/] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ]/] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
***] | |||
***] | |||
***] | |||
** ]: ] | |||
*** ]: ] | |||
</div> | |||
{{col-end}} | |||
===Clans of Jammu and Himachal=== | |||
Rajput clans in ] and ]: Jaswal, Chambial, Mankotia, Sambial, Guleria, Dadwal, Jamwal, Chib, Katoch, Suketia, Kutlehria, Baloria, Charak, Bandral, Kahluria etc. | |||
==]== | |||
==References== | |||
{{col-begin}} | {{col-begin}} | ||
{{col-2}} | {{col-2}} | ||
<div |
<div class="references-small"> | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
| Surname1 = Beck | | Surname1 = Beck | ||
Line 286: | Line 203: | ||
| Publisher = Kavi Prakashan | | Publisher = Kavi Prakashan | ||
| ID = ASIN B0000CPJC0 | | ID = ASIN B0000CPJC0 | ||
| Comment = Very detailed description of Bhatti clan of |
| Comment = Very detailed description of Bhatti clan of Rajputs. Contains details on the siege of Jaisalmer and how proudly Jaisalmer was defended by Bhattis for eight consecutive years. | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Bhati | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Hukam Singh | |||
| Year = 2003 | |||
| Title = Bhati vamsa ka gauravamaya itihasa Vol I-II. | |||
| Publisher = Ithihass Anusandhan Sansthan, Chaupasani, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = History of ] clan of ]s. | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 303: | Line 211: | ||
| Title = Maharaja Mansingh: the mystic monarch of Marwar. | | Title = Maharaja Mansingh: the mystic monarch of Marwar. | ||
| Publisher = Maharaja Man Singh Pustak Prakash, Jodhpur | | Publisher = Maharaja Man Singh Pustak Prakash, Jodhpur | ||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Bhati | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Hukam Singh | |||
| Year = 1990 | |||
| Title = Maheca Rathaurom ka mula itihasa: Ravala Mallinatha ke vamsaja - Maheca, Baramera, Pokarana, Kotariya aura Khavariya Rathaurom ka sodhapurna itihasa. | |||
| Publisher = Ratan Prakashan, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = This book describes the ] ruler mallinath. His relationship with present ] and ] royal houses are described. Also his descendants created multiple ] ]s: Mahecha, Khavariya etc | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Bhati | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Hukam Singh (Editor) | |||
| Year = 1993 | |||
| Title = Mevara jagiradaram ri vigata : Maharana Amarasimha Dvi. evam Maharana Bhimasimha. | |||
| Publisher = Pratap Shodh Pratishtan, Udaipur 313 001 | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Bhati | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Hukam Singh (Editor) | |||
| Year = 2001 | |||
| Title = Svatantrya vira Rava Chandrasena: Jodhapura ka sasaka 1562-1581. | |||
| Publisher = Rajasthani Shodh Sansthan, Chaupasani, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Bhati | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Hukam Singh (Editor) | |||
| Year = 2002 | |||
| Title = Vira siromani Rava Amarasimha Rathaura : Nagaura ka sasaka, 1638-1644. | |||
| Publisher = Rajasthani Shodh Sansthan, Chaupasani, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = | | ID = | ||
}}. | }}. | ||
Line 345: | Line 220: | ||
| Publisher = | | Publisher = | ||
| ID = | | ID = | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Chauhan | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Bindhayaraj | |||
| Year = 2003 | |||
| Title = Bharata ka Liyonidasa, Sonigira Virama de Chauhana, Jalaura: Lionidas of India Sonigira Viram de Chauhan. | |||
| Publisher = Arjun Singh Songara publication, Sanchore, Jalore, Rajasthan | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = A very detailed description of the victory of Kanhad Dev and Biram Dev against Ulugh Khan and there subsequent war with Khilji. (Chapter 3, Page 40-51. Chapter 14&15, Page 70-92. Chapter 18&19, Page 103-112.) | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Chauhan | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Lal Bhadur Singh | |||
| Year = ISBN 81-7043-429-7 | |||
| Title = Rashtra-gaurava suravira Maharana Pratapa. | |||
| Publisher = Atma Ram and Sons, New Delhi 110006 | |||
| ID = ISBN 81-7043-429-7 | |||
| Comment = Chauhan says on page 16 that Maharana proved these words of Lord ] "Kshatriya Tanu Dhari Samar Sakana | Kul Kalanka Tehi Pamar Jaana ||" | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 379: | Line 236: | ||
| Publisher = | | Publisher = | ||
| ID = ISBN 8175738324 | | ID = ISBN 8175738324 | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Gehlote | |||
| Given1 = Sukhvir Singh | |||
| Year = 2000 | |||
| Title = Svatamtrata-premi Durgadasa Rathaura. | |||
| Publisher = Navbharat Publications, ] 342 001, ] | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Details of ]'s life. His saving of Ajit in Delhi (Chapter 3: Pages 35-38) | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Harlan | |||
| Given1 = Lindsey | |||
| Year = 1992 | |||
| Title = Religion and Rajput Women: The Ethic of Protection in Contemporary Narratives. | |||
| Publisher = University of California Press | |||
| ID = ISBN 0520073398 | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 430: | Line 270: | ||
| Publisher = Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi | | Publisher = Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi | ||
| ID = ISBN 81-215-0570-2 | | ID = ISBN 81-215-0570-2 | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Khan | |||
| Given1 = Rana Muhammad Sarwar | |||
| Year = 2005 | |||
| Title = The Rajputs: History, Clans, Culture and Nobility | |||
| Publisher = Eastern Book Corporation | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = 2 Vols. | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 447: | Line 296: | ||
| ID = ISBN 81-8182-016-9 | | ID = ISBN 81-8182-016-9 | ||
| Comment = Maharana Pratap's war strategy is discussed in detail. | | Comment = Maharana Pratap's war strategy is discussed in detail. | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Mishra | |||
| Given1 = Jwalaprasad | |||
| Year = 1914 | |||
| Title = Jati Bhaskara. | |||
| Publisher = Khemaraj Shrikrishnadas | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 464: | Line 305: | ||
| ID = | | ID = | ||
| Comment = Lineage of Rathore rulers is provided starting with Rao Sheoji. | | Comment = Lineage of Rathore rulers is provided starting with Rao Sheoji. | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Nirala | |||
| Given1 = ] | |||
| Year = 1998 | |||
| Title = Maharana Pratapa | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = ISBN 81-267-0836-0 | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Ojha | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Gauri Shankar Hira Chand | |||
| Year = First edition 1936, Second revised edition 1999 | |||
| Title = Sirohi rajya ka itihasa. | |||
| Publisher = Rajasthani Granthagar, Sojati gate, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Description of ] ]s and there kingdom. | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Prakash | |||
| Given1 = Ved | |||
| Year = 2005 | |||
| Title = Vira Durgadasa Rathaurha. | |||
| Publisher = Rajbhasha Pustak Pratishthan, Shivaji Marg, Delhi 110053 | |||
| ID = ISBN 81-88613-10-X | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Premchand | |||
| Given1 = Munshi | |||
| Year = 1998 | |||
| Title = Maharana Pratap. | |||
| Publisher = Sahityasagar, Jaipur 302003 | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Maharana's life and battle of Haldighati described. Lot of couplets about Maharana composed in Maharana's time are also listed. | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 533: | Line 340: | ||
| ID = | | ID = | ||
| Comment = Description of Padmini's Jauhar, Gora and Badal's bravery, Allauddin's treachery against Rana Ratan Singh. | | Comment = Description of Padmini's Jauhar, Gora and Badal's bravery, Allauddin's treachery against Rana Ratan Singh. | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Reu | |||
| Given1 = Pt. Vishveshwar Nath | |||
| Year = 2005 | |||
| Title = Maravara ka itihasa Vol I-II. | |||
| Publisher = Rajasthani Granthagar, Sojati Gate, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = ISBN 81-86103-46-5 | |||
| Comment = Description of Rathore rise in Marwar. Various wars are described. Battle of Sammel and Rathore rebellion against Aurangzeb are covered in great detail. (Rao Maldeo: Chapter 19 Vol I: Pages 116:144). | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
{{col-2}} | {{col-2}} | ||
<div |
<div class="references-small"> | ||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Sarada | |||
| Given1 = Har Bilasa | |||
| Year = 2000 | |||
| Title = Hindupati Maharana Sanga: sacitra. | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
| Surname1 = Sarada | | Surname1 = Sarada | ||
Line 571: | Line 362: | ||
| ID = ISBN 0891480854 | | ID = ISBN 0891480854 | ||
| Comment = This book describes the battle of Sammel between Maldev's generals and Sher Shah Suri. (Volume 1. Page 163-169) | | Comment = This book describes the battle of Sammel between Maldev's generals and Sher Shah Suri. (Volume 1. Page 163-169) | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Saraswat | |||
| Given1 = Rawat | |||
| Year = 1984 | |||
| Title = Prithviraja Rathaura. | |||
| Publisher = Sahitya Akademi, Ferozeshah Road, New Delhi, 110001 | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Life history of Prithviraj Rathore, a cousin of Maharana Pratap. He is famous for sending the couplet on hearing the rumour of Maharana's surrender in Akbar's court. | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 607: | Line 389: | ||
| Publisher = Hope India Publications. | | Publisher = Hope India Publications. | ||
| ID = ISBN 817871003X | | ID = ISBN 817871003X | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Sharma | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Vasumati | |||
| Year = 2000 | |||
| Title = ] rajavamsa ke riti-rivaja: 1600-1850. | |||
| Publisher = Maharaja Man Singh Pustak Prakash, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Social customs of Marwar kings are described. Marriage ceremonies, festivals etc. | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Sharma 'Chandra' | |||
| Given1 = Yadavendra | |||
| Year = 2000 | |||
| Title = Amara Simha Rathaura. | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Fiercely proud and brave Amar Singh Rathore's life is chronicled in this book. | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Simha | |||
| Given1 = Thakur Udainarain | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Kshatriya Vamshavali. | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 667: | Line 423: | ||
| Publisher = Research Publishers, Merti Gate, Jodhpur 342 002 | | Publisher = Research Publishers, Merti Gate, Jodhpur 342 002 | ||
| ID = ISBN 81-85310-00-9 | | ID = ISBN 81-85310-00-9 | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Solanki | |||
| Given1 = Dr. Ram Singh | |||
| Year = 1999 | |||
| Title = Rashtravira Durgadasa Rathaura. | |||
| Publisher = Rajasthani Shodh Sansthan, Chaupasani, Jodhpur | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Durga Das Rathore's life history. | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 685: | Line 432: | ||
| ID = | | ID = | ||
| Comment = Life of Maharana Kumbha of ]. | | Comment = Life of Maharana Kumbha of ]. | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Somani | |||
| Given1 = Ram Vallabha | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Maharana Pratapa : aitihasika adhyayana. | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = ISBN 818523454X | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 709: | Line 448: | ||
| Publisher = Manoj Publications, Delhi 110084 | | Publisher = Manoj Publications, Delhi 110084 | ||
| ID = ISBN 81-8133-591-0 | | ID = ISBN 81-8133-591-0 | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = Tod | |||
| Given1 = James | |||
| Surname2 = Crooke | |||
| Given2 = William (Editor) | |||
| Year = 1994 | |||
| Title = Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan (2 vols.). | |||
| Publisher = Trans-Atl | |||
| ID = ISBN 8170691281 | |||
| Comment = The way Surjan Hada was befriended by Man Singh and Akbar and the conditions that Surjan laid down for this friendship are chronicled. Surjan's leaving ] and living in ] because of this friendship is also documented by ] in this book. Treachery against Rana Sanga is also described in this book. (Treachery against Rana Sanga: Annals of Mewar, Chapter IX Vol-I: Pages 243-246. Surjan Hada: Page 381-385 volume II). | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
*{{Harvard reference | *{{Harvard reference | ||
Line 747: | Line 475: | ||
| Publisher = | | Publisher = | ||
| ID = | | ID = | ||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Gogunda ki khyata | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Jalore: a history of greatest patriotic saga of Chauhan clan | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Maharana Pratapa: eka aise vira yoddha ki jivana-gatha jisane svatantrata ke lie apani akhiri samsa taka visala Mugala samrajya se janga ki | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Maravara ke thikanom ki puralekhiya sampada | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = An excellent research book to figure out which clans tilled what piece of land in ] and how much revenue they had to provide to the Maharaja of Marwar. | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Marwar-Jodhpur | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Panna dhaya : prabandha kavya | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Pranapala Durgadasa Rathaura | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Relations between Marwar and the Marathas, A.D. 1724-1843 A.D. | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
| Comment = Rathore and Maratha wars are described and how Ajmer proved to be a stumbling stone in the establishment of Maratha, Rathore confederacy. | |||
}}. | |||
*{{Harvard reference | |||
| Surname1 = | |||
| Given1 = | |||
| Year = | |||
| Title = Survey of Kheechi Chauhan history, with biographical notes | |||
| Publisher = | |||
| ID = | |||
}}. | }}. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
{{col-end}} | {{col-end}} | ||
===See also=== | |||
* | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
] | |||
===External links=== | |||
] | |||
* | |||
] | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Revision as of 10:45, 28 June 2006
This article is currently under extended confirmed protection. Extended confirmed protection prevents edits from all unregistered editors and registered users with fewer than 30 days tenure and 500 edits. The policy on community use specifies that extended confirmed protection can be applied to combat disruption, if semi-protection has proven to be ineffective. Extended confirmed protection may also be applied to enforce arbitration sanctions. Please discuss any changes on the talk page; you may submit an edit request to ask for uncontroversial changes supported by consensus. |
Rajputs (from the Sanskrit tatpurusha compound rājaputra, "son of a king") are a prominent social group of India, Nepal and Pakistan. They claim descent from the ancient royal dynasties of the region. Within the Hindu caste system, Rajputs constitute one of the principal groups belonging to the Kshatriya varna.
Rajput dynasties played a prominent role in the history of northern India. They developed an ethos of warlike chivalry that served as the benchmark for other Indian communities as the latter ascended to regional dominance. This martial ethos did not preclude patronage of the arts: distinctive forms of painting and architecture developed under the aegis of Rajput courts, and classical music found support. Thus, the Rajputs have contributed directly and indirectly to many facets of the Indian crasis.
Demographics
The 1931 census of British India was the last to record caste affiliation in a manner that provides reliable information on Rajput demographics. Any present-day estimates are speculative; they also vary widely. These figures are of interest as they denote the approximate spread and composition of the Rajput community.
The 1931 census reported a total of 10.7 million people self-describing as Rajput. Of this population, about 8.6 million people also self-described as being Hindu, about 2.1 million as being Muslim and about 50,000 as being Sikh by religion. The United Provinces (being approximately present-day Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal combined) reported the largest population of Rajputs, at 3,756,936. Next came the undivided province of Punjab with 2,351,650. The (then united) province of Bihar & Orissa, corrosponding to the present-day states of Bihar, Orissa and Jharkhand, reported a Rajput population of 1,412,440. Rajputana, which was almost co-terminus with the present-day state of Rajasthan, reported a figure of 669,516. The Central Provinces and Berar reported a figure of 506,087, the princely state of Gwalior of 393,076, the Central India Agency of 388,942, the Bombay Presidency of 352,016, the princely state of Jammu & Kashmir of 256,020, and the Western India States Agency of 227,137 Rajputs. The undivided province of Bengal (including present-day Bangladesh reported a figure of 156,978 Rajputs. The princely states of Baroda and Hyderabad reported figures of 94,893 and 88,434 respectively.
Rajputs typically speak whatever languages are spoken by the general population of the areas they live in. Hindi, Punjabi, Gujarati, and dialects of these languages are the major native languages (mother tongues) of the Rajputs.
Origins
Main article: Origin of RajputsThe traditional occupations of the Rajput are war and agriculture. As many scholars have pointed out, these areas lend themselves uniquely to the ingress of groups that were not formerly affiliated with those professions. The gradual accommodation of the new entrants into the social and family circle of the traditional community is the essential quid pro quo of the Sanskritization that the aspirant community essays. This phenomenon of gradual inclusion has indubitably obtained in the case of the Rajputs, with certain Jat and Maratha dynasties being among the most recent to venture the claim of affiliation with the Rajput community. In view of this, to seek a single and common, definitive origin for every present-day Rajput is widely recognised as being an exercise in futility. We present both traditional legends and some scholarly speculations made by researchers on the origin of the Rajputs.
Legendary accounts
Main article: Rajput clansAs Kshatriyas, the Rajputs regard themselves as being descended from the vedic warrior class. Legend ascribes to the Rajputs an origin stemming from certain Hindu deities; every Rajput must eventually belong to one of three great patrilineages, being:
- the Agnivanshi lineage, claiming descent from Agni, the Hindu Fire-god;
- the Suryavanshi lineage, claiming descent from Surya, the Hindu Sun-god;
- the Chandravanshi lineage, claiming descent from Chandra, the Hindu Moon-god.
Some scholars also count Nagavanshi, Rishivanshi and Vayuvanshi as traditional lineages. The Yaduvanshi lineage, claiming descent from the Hindu god Krishna, are in fact a major sept of the Chandravanshi lineage.
The aforementioned three patrilineages (vanshas) sub-divide into 36 main clans (kulas), which in turn divide into numerous branches (shakhas) to create the intricate clan system of the Rajputs. The principle of patrilineage is staunchly adhered to in determining one's place in the system and a strong consciousness of clan and lineage is an essential part of the Rajput character. As the 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica states, this tradition of common ancestry permits an indigent Rajput yeoman to consider himself as well-born as any powerful landholder of his clan, and superior to any high official of the professional classes. Authoritative listings of the 36 Rajput clans are to be found in the Kumārpāla Charita of Jayasimha and the Prithvirāj Rāso of Chandbardai.
Among the legends mentioned above, the one which addresses the origin of the Agnivanshi Rajputs is particularly interesting, not least because they were the earliest to rise to political prominence. This legend begins with the puranic legend wherein the traditional kshatriyas of the land were exterminated by Parashurama, an avatara of Vishnu. Later, the legend says, sage Vasishta performed a great Yajna or fire-sacrifice, to seek from the Gods a provision for the defense of righteousness on earth. In answer to his prayer, a youth arose from the very flames of the sacrifice -- the first Agnivanshi Rajput. In some versions of the legend, all the Rajput lineages rose thus from the sacred flames.
Scientific View
Many scholars view the Agni kunda (fire-sacrifice) legend as suggesting, in an allegorical manner, the possibility that people who were not hitherto regarded as kshatriyas/Rajputs could come to be regarded as such after the customary fire-sacrifice based purificatory rituals. Many scholarly speculations on the origin of the Rajputs have been based on this legend. James Tod uses it as a basis for speculating upon a Scythian origin for the Rajputs. He suggests that Scythian (Saka, Huna) tribes which invaded India in the 6th century AD and disappeared into the population soon afterwards were the forbears of present-day Rajputs. Many modern historians tend to agree with this assessment, which according to some scholars, finds evidence in anthropological research.
Political history
Main article: History of RajputsRajput history, being a part of broader north Indian history, can be classified easily into several distinct periods.
Early history
The Rai Dynasty, who ruled Sindh in the 6th and 7th centuries and were displaced by an Arab army led by Bin Qasim, are sometimes held to have been Rajputs. According to some sources, Bin Qasim, an Arab who invaded Sindh in the 8th century, also attacked Chittorgarh, and was defeated by Bappa Rawal. Certain other invasions by murauding "Yavvanas" are also recorded in this era. By this time, the appelation "Yavvana" (literally: "Ionian/Greek") was used in connection to any tribe that emerged from the west and north-west of present-day Pakistan. These invasions may therefore have been a continuation of the usual invasions into India by warlike but less civilized tribes from the north-west, and not a reference to the Greeks or Indo-Greeks. Lalitaditya of Kashmir defeated one such Yavvana invasion in the 8th century and the Pratiharas rebuffed another in the 9th century.
The Rajput period (7th-11th centuries AD)
The first Rajput kingdoms are attested to in the 7th century and it was in the 9th and 10th centuries that the Rajputs rose to prominence in Indian history. The four Agnivanshi clans, namely, the Pratiharas (Pariharas), Solankis (Chaulukyas), Paramaras (Parmars) and Chauhans (Chahamanas), rose to prominence first.
Major kingdoms
The Pratiharas established their rule over Malwa and ruled from Ujjaini in the 8th century. One branch of the clan established a state in nearby Marwar, where they held sway until they were supplanted by the Rathores in the 14th century. Around 816 AD, the Pratiharas of Ujjaini conquered Kannauj, from which city they ruled much of northern India for a century. They went into decline after Rashtrakuta invasions in the early 10th century. The Kachwahas, Chandelas and Tomaras all originate as vassals of the Pratihara kingdom.
The Solankis were descended from the Chalukyas who ruled much of peninsular India between the 6th and 12th centuries. In the 10th century, a local branch of the clan established control over Gujarat and ruled a state centered around the town of Patan. They went into decline in the 13th century and were displaced by the Vaghela and Jadeja clans.
The Paramaras were near neighbours of the Solankis. They originated as feudatories of the Rashtrakutas and rose to power in the 10th century. They ruled Malwa and the area at the border between present-day Gujarat and Rajasthan. Bhoja, celebrated king of Malwa, belonged to this dynasty. In the 12th century, the Paramaras declined in power due to conflict with the Solankis and succumbed to attack from the Delhi sultanate in 1305.
The Chauhans originated as feudatories of the Pratiharas and rose to power in the wake of the decline of that power. Their state was initially centered around Sambhar in present-day Rajasthan. In the 11th century, they founded the city of Ajmer which became their capital. In the 12th century, they captured Delhi from the Tomaras. Their most famous ruler was Prithviraj Chauhan, who won the First Battle of Tarain against an invading muslim army but lost the second battle of Tarain the following year. This loss heralded a prolonged period of muslim rule over northern India.
Other early states: The Suryavanshi and Chandravanshi Rajputs later established independent states. The Guhilots (later known as the Sisodias) established the state of Mewar in the 8th century. This state was founded by Bappa Rawal, who ruled from Chittorgarh. The Tomara clan established a state in present-day Haryana. They are credited with having founded (c.736) the city of Dhiliki, later known as Delhi. The Chandela clan ruled Bundelkhand after the 10th century, occupying the fortress of Kalinjar; they later built the famous temples at Khajuraho.
Legacy
The organization of Rajput clan finally crystallized in this period. Intermarriage among the Rajput clans interlinked the various regions of India, facilitating the flow of trade and scholarship. Archaeological evidence and contemporary texts suggest that Indian society achieved significant prosperity during this era.
The literature composed in this period, both in Sanskrit and in the Apabhramshas, constitutes a substantial segment of classical Indian literature. The early 11th century saw the reign of the polymath king Bhoja, Paramara ruler of Malwa. He was not only a patron of literature and the arts but was himself a distinguished writer. His Samarangana-sutradhara deals with architecture and his Raja-Martanda is a famous commentary on the Yoga-sutras. Many major monuments of northern and central India, including those at Khajuraho, date from this period.
Islamic invasions (c.11th-16th centuries)
The fertile and prosperous plains of northern India had always been the destination of choice for streams of invaders coming from the north-west. The last of these waves of invasions were of tribes who had previously converted to Islam. Due to geographic reasons, Rajput-ruled states suffered the brunt of aggression from various Mongol-Turkic-Afghan warlords who repeatedly invaded the subcontinent. In his New History of India, Stanley Wolpert wrote "The Rajputs were the vanguard of Hindu India in the face of the Islamic onslaught."
Within 15 years of the death of the Muhammad, the caliph Usman sent a sea expedition to raid Thana and Broach on the Bombay coast. Other unsuccessful raiding expeditions to Sindh took place in 662 and 664 AD. Indeed, within a hundred years after Muhammad's death, Muslim armies had overrun much of Asia as far as the Hindu Kush. However, it was not until c.1000 AD that they could establish any foothold in India.
In the early 11th century, Mahmud of Ghazni conquered the Hindu Shahi kingdom in the Punjab. His raids into northern India weakened the Pratihara kingdom, which was drastically reduced in size and came under the control of the Chandelas. In 1018 AD, Mahmud sacked the city of Kannauj, seat of the Pratihara kingdom, but withdrew immediately to Ghazni, being interested in booty rather than empire. In the ensuing chaos, the Gahadvala dynasty established a modest state centered around Kannauj, ruling for about a hundred years. They were defeated by Muhammad of Ghor in 1194 AD, when the city was sacked by the latter.
Meanwhile, a nearby state centered around present-day Delhi was ruled successively by the Tomara and Chauhan clans. Prithiviraj III, ruler of Delhi, defeated Muhammad of Ghor at the First Battle of Tarain (1191 AD). Muhammad returned the following year and defeated Prithviraj at the Second Battle of Tarain (1192 AD). In this battle, as in many others of this era, rampant internecine conflict among Rajput kingdoms facilitated the victory of the invaders.
Later Rajput states
Prithviraj Chauhan proved to be the last Rajput ruler of Delhi. The Chauhans, led by Govinda, grandson of Prithviraj, later established a small state centered around Ranthambore in present-day Rajasthan. The Songara sept of the Chauhan clan later ruled Jalore, while and Hada sept of the same clan established their rule over the Hadoti region in the mid-13th century. The Tomaras later established themselves at Gwalior, and the ruler Man Singh built the fortress which still stands there. As we have seen, Muhammad's armies brought down the Gahadvala kingdom of Kannauj in 1194 AD. Some surviving members of the Gahadvala dynasty are said to have refugeed to the western desert, formed the Rathore clan, and later founded the state of Marwar. The Kachwaha clan came to rule Dhundhar (later Jaipur) with their capital at Amber.
Other relocations surmised to have occurred in this period include the emigration of Rajput clans to the Himalayas. The Katoch clan, the Chauhans of Chamba and certain Rajput clans of Nepal are counted among this number.
Conflict with the Sultanate
The Delhi Sultanate was founded by Qutb ud din Aybak, Muhammad of Ghor's successor, in the early 13th century. Sultan Alauddin Khilji (1296-1316) conquered Gujarat (1297), Malwa (1305), Ranthambore (1301), Chittorgarh (1303) and Jalore (1311), all after long sieges and fierce resistance from their Rajput defenders.
First Jauhar: In particular, the siege of Chittor (1303), its brave defence by the Guhilas, the saga of Rani Padmini and the Jauhar she led are the stuff of immortal legend. This incident has had a defining impact upon the Rajput character and is detailed in a succeeding section.
Ala-ud-din Khilji delegated the administration of the newly conquered areas to his principal Rajput collaborator, Maldeo Songara, ruler of Jalore; the latter was soon displaced by his son-in-law Hammir, a scion of the lately displaced Guhila clan, who re-established the state of Mewar c.1326 AD. Mewar was to emerge as a leading Rajput state, after Rana Kumbha expanded his kingdom at the expense of the sultanates of Malwa and Gujarat.
Mughal era (16th-18th c.)
The Delhi sultanate was extinguished when Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi at the First Battle of Panipat in 1526. Rana Sanga, ruler of Mewar, rallied an army to challenge Babur. He was betrayed by one of his Rajput generals, and was defeated by Babur at the Battle of Khanua on March 16, 1527. However, it was not until the reign of Akbar that the structure of relations between the Mughal imperium and the Rajput states took definitive shape.
Second Jauhar: Rana Sanga died soon after the battle of Khanua; shortly afterwards, Mewar came under the regency of his widow, Rani Karmavati. The kingdom was menaced by Bahadur Shah, ruler of Gujarat. According to one romantic legend of dubious veracity, Karmavati importuned the assistance of Humayun, son of her late husband's foe. The help arrived, but too late; Chittor as reduced by Bahadur Shah. This is the occasion for the second of the three Jauhars performed at Chittor. Karmavati led the ladies of the citadel into death by fire, while the menfolk sallied out to meet the besieging Muslim army in a hopeless fight to the death.
Mughal-Rajput alliance
Babur's son Humayun was an ineffectual ruler who perforce spend long periods in exile. His son was made of a different mettle; Akbar consolidated his inheritence and expanded what had been the "Delhi sultanate" into a wide empire. A main factor in this success was indubitably his co-option of native Rajput chiefs into his empire-building project; his reign countenanced, for the first time, the involvement of Hindus in the affairs of the empire. The Rajput chiefs collaborated with alacrity, an alliance cemented by marriage, with numerous Rajput noblewomen being wed to mughal grandees. The Kachwahas were the first to give a daughter to Akbar; they pioneered a trend that soon turned pervasive and played no small role in extending Rajput influence across the Indian sub-continent, from Bengal to Afghanistan to the Deccan. Indeed, two successive mughal emperors, Jehangir and Shah Jehan, were born to Rajput mothers.
Rajput chiefs served as mughal officers and administrators across the mughal empire and enjoyed much influence in the government. In this period, the aristocratic image of the Rajputs can be said to have finally crystallized; consequently, caste-divisions became rigid. The trend of political relations between Rajput states and the central power was the precursor for similar relations between them and the British.
Rana Pratap
Third Jauhar: However, these relations were not universally approbated. Mewar, which justly enjoys a unique position in the Rajput mind, held out and valiantly gave battle to Akbar. After a brave struggle, Mewar's chief citadel of Chittor finally fell to Akbar in 1568. The third (and last) Jauhar of Chittor transpired on this occasion. When the fall of the citadel became imminent, the ladies of the fort committed collective self-immolation and the men sallied out of the fort to meet the invading muslim army in a hopeless fight to an honourable death.
Prior to this event, Mewar's ruler, Udai Singh, had retired to the nearby hills; he was succeeded while in exile by his son Rana Pratap as head of the Sisodia clan. Even in exile, the Sisodias did not rest; they harassed the mughal administrators of the land enough to cause them to make accommodatory overtures. Rana Pratap, a present-day Rajput icon, rebuffed every such overtures of friendship from Akbar, and rallied an army to meet the mughal forces. He was defeated at the battle of Haldighati on June 21, 1576 and was forced to withdraw to the Aravalli ranges. However, he carried out a relentless guerilla struggle from his hideout in those hills, and never gave in to the mughal power. After Pratap's death, his son Amar Singh continued the struggle for some time, but finally entered into alliance with the mughals. He thus regained control of his state as a vassal of the mughals.
The Sisodias rulers of Mewar were famously the last Rajput dynasty to enter into alliance with the Mughals. The Rajput states thereafter remained loyal to the mughal empire for over two centuries, until it was supplanted by the British Raj. Indeed, even as late as in the early 19th century, Rajput courts rarely failed to formally affirm their loyalty to the (by now entirely powerless) mughal emperor in all their official communiques and documents.
Maratha and British suzerainty (18th-20th c.)
The Marathas of the Deccan rose to power in the 18th century. They conquered the major portion of India during this period, including the Rajput states of central and western India. Jodhpur was conquered by Sindhia, who annexed the fort and town of Ajmer and levied a tribute of 60,000 rupees. James Tod, whose personal observation pertains to this period, records that internecine disputes, succession wars and the relentless exaction of levies by the Marathas left the Rajput states immiserated, and that the Rajput states repeatedly petitioned the British administration for protection. After the Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817-1818), 18 states in the Rajputana region, of which 15 were ruled by Rajputs, entered into "subsidiary alliance" with the HEIC and became princely states under the British Raj. The British took direct control of Ajmer, which became the province of Ajmer-Merwara. A vast number of other Rajput states in central and western India made a similar transition. Most od them were placed under the authority of the Central India Agency and the various states' agencies of Kathiawar.
The British colonial officials in general were very impressed by the military qualities of the Rajputs. In his Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan James Tod writes:
- "What nation on earth could have maintained the semblance of civilization, the spirit or the customs of their forefathers, during so many centuries of overwhelming depression, but one of such singular character as the Rajpoot? . . . Rajast’han exhibits the sole example in the history of mankind, of a people withstanding every outrage barbarity could inflict, or human nature sustain, from a foe whose religion commands annihilation; and bent to the earth, yet rising buoyant from the pressure, and making calamity a whetstone to courage. . . . Not an iota of their religion or customs have they lost. . . ".
When India gained its independence in 1947, the Rajput states acceded unto the dominion of India. They were all merged into the union of India before 1950.
Culture and ethos
The Rajput ethos is martial in spirit, fiercely proud and independent, and emphasizes lineage and tradition. Rajput patriotism is legendary, an ideal they embodied with a sometimes fanatical zeal, often choosing death before dishonour. Rajput warriors were often known to fight until the last man.
All recorded instances of jauhar have featured Rajput defenders of a fort, resisting the invasion of a muslim force. On several occasions when defeat in such an engagement became certain, the Rajput defenders of the fort scripted a final act of heroism that rendered the incident an immortal inspiration and afforded the invaders only an exceedingly hollow, inglorious victory. In such incidents, the ladies of the fort would commit collective self-immolation. Wearing their wedding dresses, and holding their young children by the hand, the ladies would commit their chastity to the flames of a massive, collective pyre, thereby escaping molestation and dishonour at the hands of the invading army. As the memorial of their herioc act, the ladies would leave only the imprint of the palm of their right hands on wet clay, which have become objects of veneration. This immolation would occur during the night, to the accompaniment of Vedic chants. Early the next morning, after taking a bath, the men would wear saffron-coloured garments, apply the ash from the pyres of their wives and children on their foreheads and put a tulsi leaf in their mouth. Then the gates would be opened and men would ride out for one final, heroic, hopeless battle, dying gloriously on the field of honour. The historic fort of Chittor, seat of the Sisodia kingdom of Mewar, was the site of the three most famous Jauhars recorded in history.
The Rajput lifestyle was designed to foster a martial spirit. Tod (1829) describes at length the bond between the Rajputs and their swords. The double-edged scimitar known as the khanda was a popular weapon among the Rajputs of that era. On special occasions, a primary chief would break up a meeting of his vassal chiefs with khanda nariyal, the distribution of daggars and coconuts (page-453). The Karga Shapna ritual, performed during the annual Navaratri festival, was another affirmation of the Rajput's reverence for his sword.
By the late 19th century, there was a shift from an emphasis on questions regarding the political relations amongst the Rajputs to a concern with kinship (Kasturi 2002:2). According to Harlan (1992:27), many Rajputs of Rajasthan are nostalgic about their past and keenly conscious of their genealogy, emphasizing a Rajput ethos that is martial in spirit, with a fierce pride in lineage and tradition. These are indeed the timeless values of the Rajput community, as the Encyclopedia Britannica (1911 edition) affirms in its resume of the contemporary social values of the community:
- The tradition of common ancestry permits a poor Rajput yeoman to consider himself as well born as any powerful landholder of his clan, and superior to any high official of the professional classes. No race in India can boast of finer feats of arms or brighter deeds of chivalry, and they form one of the main recruiting fields for the Indian army of the day. They consider any occupation other than that of arms or government derogatory to their dignity, and consequently during the long period of peace which has followed the establishment of the British rule in India, they have been content to stay idle at home instead of taking up any of the other professions in which they might have come to the front.
Cognate communities
The mainstream Rajput community comprises of Hindus belonging to the Kshatriya caste and to a specific set of 36 clans. Several other communities identify themselves as being Rajput, typically claiming to be of partial Rajput descent. They are found both in the Hindu community and in other religious groups.
Cognate Hindu communities: Certain Hindu communities claim partial descent from the Rajput community while holding social identities that set them apart from the main communion. The Garasia Scheduled tribe of the Aravalli hills are among these. Many Rajputs perforce fled to the hills at various points in history, where they are said to have occasionally intermarried with the Bhils; the Garasia community claim to be descended from such intermarriage. Some sections of the Gaddi scheduled tribe of Himachal Pradesh ascribe to themselves a similar heritage, as do the Gadia Lohar community of nomadic blacksmiths. Certain specific sections of the Jain and Marwari communities also hold themselves to be of part-Rajput descent.
Sikh Rajputs: The census of 1931 recorded the existence of 50,000 people who claimed to be both Rajput and Sikh. Occasional instances of inter-marriage between them and Hindu Rajputs are recorded.
Muslim Rajputs: The census of 1931 recorded a population of 2.1 million Muslim Rajputs in British India, concentrated primarily in Panjab and the United Provinces with smaller numbers in other places. In Panjab, Sindh, and Kashmir, they made up the majority of those claiming to be Rajput. The great majority of Muslim Rajputs today live in Pakistan. Detailed information on the community is available at the Muslim Rajputs page.
The Muslim Rajputs trace their lineages back to Hindu Rajputs who converted to Islam. Kasturi (2002:2) affirms that one or more branches in a stratified clan lineage could indeed be Muslim. However, there is no inter-marriage or other clan relations between Muslim and Non-Muslim Rajputs; however, Muslim Rajputs may intermarry with Muslims of other communities. Nevertheless, Muslim Rajputs usually marry amongst themselves, and only seldom depart from the custom of endogamy. The Thukrai community of East Champaran district in Bihar, India are among those noted for maintaining a strict tradition of Muslim Rajput endogamy. Prominent Muslim Rajput personalities include General Asif Nawaz Khan Janjua, former Chief of Staff, Pakistan; General Iftikhar Janjua, Pakistani military commander; Amir Khan, British Olympic silver medalist for boxing and Rana Sehar Ali-Noor.
Famous Rajput people
The Rajputs have contributed to many facets of Indian life, both historically and in the modern age. A few prominent Rajputs are mentioned below:
Historical heroes
Modern age
- Vishwanath Pratap Singh, Prime Minister of India (Dec.2, 1989-Nov.10, 1990)
- Chandra Shekhar, Prime Minister of India (Nov.10, 1990-June 21, 1991)
- Jaswant Singh, sometime leader of opposition, Rajya Sabha
- Bhairon Singh Shekhawat, Vice-president of India.
- Rajyavardhan Singh Rathore, olympic silver medalist
See also
External links
- Rajputs Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition; 2005
- Rajput Encyclopedia Britannica; 1911
- British Association of Rajputs
Notes
- Rajputs: A Scythian people?
- Review of the book "Marginal Muslim Communities In India", edited by M.K.A.Siddiqui (2004)
References
- Template:Harvard reference .
- Kasturi, Malavika, Embattled Identities Rajput Lineages, Oxford University Press (2002) ISBN 01956-5787-x
- M K A Siddiqui (ed.), Marginal Muslim Communities In India, Institute of Objective Studies, New Delhi (2004)
- Template:Harvard reference.
- W.W. Hunter, The Indian empire, its people, history and products. First published: London, Trubner & Co., Ludgate Hill, 1886. ISBN 81-206-1581-6.
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
{{cite encyclopedia}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)