| Revision as of 11:46, 27 May 2014 editBracketBot (talk | contribs)173,351 edits Bot: Notice of potential markup breaking← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:49, 29 May 2014 edit undoKuyabribri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,947 edits →Joaquín Santiago: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| *<nowiki>When ABC first went on the air, they utilised the successful{{pov-inline|date=May 2014}}</nowiki>{{red|'''}}'''}}<nowiki> branding of their sister company ''ABC Cinemas''. This featured a triangular shield with the</nowiki> | *<nowiki>When ABC first went on the air, they utilised the successful{{pov-inline|date=May 2014}}</nowiki>{{red|'''}}'''}}<nowiki> branding of their sister company ''ABC Cinemas''. This featured a triangular shield with the</nowiki> | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, -2, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 11:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 0, -2, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 11:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, I regularly monitor ] and noticed that despite your best efforts to improve the article ], you still suspect that it could be a hoax, or at best it is chock full of factual inaccuracies. Would you care to nominate it at AfD? Ordinarily I would do so as a procedural nomination, but judging from the edit history it appears you have done a lot of research on this subject, at least a lot more than I have. —<span style="color:#808080">]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">]</span></sup> 17:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:49, 29 May 2014
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
RE: reverting Jason Narvy
Hey, instead of taking the easy way out and reverting my edit, why don't you contribute to the community by Googling around and citing a source yourself, you laggard ineffectual douchebag? Here, I'll make your job even easier and paste the source right here: http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/ http://cuchicago.edu/faculty/communications-and-theatre/jason-narvy/
March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Christ the Redeemer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '']''' 9or '''Cristo Redentor''') is a Christian icon. It may also refer to:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Juan Bobo photo
Damiens, I noticed another photo deletion nomination for a Juan Bobo photo. You made a suggestion regarding the uploading of this photo . In the interest of collaboration, would you consider uploading that photo and placing it into the article? That way we could all move forward...together. Please consider it and thank you. Sarason (talk) 03:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- That specific flickr picture is tagged as "all rights reserved". We can't upload it. What I actually suggested was to someone to take a picture of that statue and release it under a free license. It's also possible to try to contact the flickr user and ask him to release his image under a free license.
- But notice I'm assuming statues on Porto Rico are in public domain. I'm not completely sure this is truth. --damiens.rf 14:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Sock complaint
Hello Damiens.rf. You made a comment about socks here at Mercy11's talk. Can you clarify who you think is a sock? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- User:Mercy11 has used a couple of socks some years ago. A lot of them were blocked. Unfortunately, it seems he engaged in copyright violations (claiming authorship of text copied from websites) not only with his main account, but also with some of the socks. I believe he will cooperate in the cleaning, though. I hope he will. There's a lot of work to do...--damiens.rf 20:43, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Puerto Rican slang words and phrases, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Associated British Corporation may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- When ABC first went on the air, they utilised the successful{{pov-inline|date=May 2014}}}} branding of their sister company ''ABC Cinemas''. This featured a triangular shield with the
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Joaquín Santiago
Hello, I regularly monitor articles tagged as possible hoaxes and noticed that despite your best efforts to improve the article Joaquín Santiago, you still suspect that it could be a hoax, or at best it is chock full of factual inaccuracies. Would you care to nominate it at AfD? Ordinarily I would do so as a procedural nomination, but judging from the edit history it appears you have done a lot of research on this subject, at least a lot more than I have. —KuyaBriBri 17:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)