| Revision as of 17:04, 3 June 2014 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,556,751 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Page needed}} {{Verify source}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:29, 9 July 2014 edit undoJoe Bodacious (talk | contribs)573 editsm →Mission: fix linkNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| PRA is supported by a number of ] and ] activists, including Anne Braden of the ], and Suzanne Pharr of the ]. Pharr has written that PRA "sets the standard for researchers and political analysts of integrity," and describes the group's research as "thorough, thoughtful, carefully researched, and presented within a broad context of understanding of the complex relationships and activities of the Right." <ref name="about" /> | PRA is supported by a number of ] and ] activists, including Anne Braden of the ], and Suzanne Pharr of the ]. Pharr has written that PRA "sets the standard for researchers and political analysts of integrity," and describes the group's research as "thorough, thoughtful, carefully researched, and presented within a broad context of understanding of the complex relationships and activities of the Right." <ref name="about" /> | ||
| Stanley Kurtz of the ] magazine '']'' described PRA's researchers as "conspiracy mongers" for a 1994 report on the religious right, and claims that PRA used guilt by association techniques to associate conservative Christians with theocratic ].<ref>"By quoting a pathetic Dominionist extremist’s desperate efforts to prove his own influence, clever liberals can now argue that the ultimate goal of all conservative Christians is the re-institution of slavery, and execution for blasphemers and witches. May 2, 2005</ref> PRA responded to Kurtz by stating that the report was "a serious study of the Dominionist Christian Reconstructionist movement."<ref></ref> | Stanley Kurtz of the ] magazine '']'' described PRA's researchers as "conspiracy mongers" for a 1994 report on the religious right, and claims that PRA used guilt by association techniques to associate conservative Christians with theocratic ].<ref>"By quoting a pathetic Dominionist extremist’s desperate efforts to prove his own influence, clever liberals can now argue that the ultimate goal of all conservative Christians is the re-institution of slavery, and execution for blasphemers and witches. May 2, 2005</ref> PRA responded to Kurtz by stating that the report was "a serious study of the Dominionist Christian Reconstructionist movement."<ref></ref> | ||
| PRA has been criticized for using a technique described as "Links and Ties," a form of ]. <ref>''The Cultic Milieu: Oppositional Subcultures in an Age of Globalization'', edited by Jeffrey Kaplan, Heléne Lööw{{Page needed|date=June 2014}}{{Verify source|date=June 2014}}</ref> | PRA has been criticized for using a technique described as "Links and Ties," a form of ]. <ref>''The Cultic Milieu: Oppositional Subcultures in an Age of Globalization'', edited by Jeffrey Kaplan, Heléne Lööw{{Page needed|date=June 2014}}{{Verify source|date=June 2014}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 01:29, 9 July 2014
"The Public Eye" redirects here. For other uses, see The Public Eye (disambiguation). | This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Political Research Associates" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2010) |
.png) | |
| Founded | 1981, changed name to PRA in 1987 |
|---|---|
| Founder | Dr. Jean V. Hardisty |
| Type | non-profit organization |
| Focus | Studying the U.S. political right |
| Location | |
| Area served | Worldwide |
| Key people | Chip Berlet, Tarso Luís Ramos, Pam Chamberlain, Surina Khan |
| Revenue | $700,000 |
Political Research Associates (PRA) (formerly Midwest Research, Chicago, 1981–1987), named and known on the Web as PoliticalResearch.org, is a non-profit research group located in Somerville, Massachusetts.
Mission
PRA studies the U.S. political right wing, as well as white supremacists, and paramilitary organizations. It has a full-time staff of six. The Executive Director is Tarso Luis Ramos. Dr. Jean V. Hardisty was the director from 1981 to 2004. Chip Berlet was the group's senior analyst from 1981-2011. Other staff members include Eric Ethington (Communications Director), Rebecca Suldan (Program Coordinator), Theo Anderson (Public Eye Magazine Editor), and Kassia Palys (Development Coordinator). Staff researchers include Rev. Kapya Kaoma and Cole Parke. Fellows include Fred Clarkson, Rachel Tabachnick, T.F. Charlton, Spencer Sunshine, and Victor Mukasa.
PRA publishes a journal, The Public Eye, quarterly, which reports on specific and current movements or trends within the U.S. political Right, and also produces special reports, past examples of which include "Calculated Compassion: How the Ex-Gay Movement Serves the Right's Attacks on Democracy," authored by former PRA research analyst, Surina Khan," which details attacks on gays and lesbians, and "Decades of Distortion," which alleged scapegoating of welfare recipients.
The group provides public speakers, and has staff on hand to answer queries from journalists, researchers, and activists. Its annual funding of approximately $700,000 per year comes from foundation grants, individual contributions, and the sale of research materials. Expenditures are directed toward staffing, general & administrative expenses, programs and fundraising. Among its major donors are the Public Welfare Foundation and the Ford Foundation.
PRA is supported by a number of progressive and liberal activists, including Anne Braden of the Southern Organizing Committee, and Suzanne Pharr of the Highlander Research Center. Pharr has written that PRA "sets the standard for researchers and political analysts of integrity," and describes the group's research as "thorough, thoughtful, carefully researched, and presented within a broad context of understanding of the complex relationships and activities of the Right."
Stanley Kurtz of the conservative magazine National Review described PRA's researchers as "conspiracy mongers" for a 1994 report on the religious right, and claims that PRA used guilt by association techniques to associate conservative Christians with theocratic Dominionism. PRA responded to Kurtz by stating that the report was "a serious study of the Dominionist Christian Reconstructionist movement."
PRA has been criticized for using a technique described as "Links and Ties," a form of guilt by association.
See also
- Clouds Blur the Rainbow, 1987 report by Chip Berlet
References
- Khan, Surina. "Calculated Compassion". Political Research Associates. Retrieved 2011.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help) - ^ PRA: About Us
- PRA Annual Report 2003-2004 See page 16
- "By quoting a pathetic Dominionist extremist’s desperate efforts to prove his own influence, clever liberals can now argue that the ultimate goal of all conservative Christians is the re-institution of slavery, and execution for blasphemers and witches. Dominionist Domination May 2, 2005
- The Christian Right, Dominionism, and Theocracy
- The Cultic Milieu: Oppositional Subcultures in an Age of Globalization, edited by Jeffrey Kaplan, Heléne Lööw
External links
- PoliticalResearch.org - The Website of Political Research Associates