Misplaced Pages

Dostoevsky and Parricide: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:00, 7 June 2014 editJacobisq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,371 edits add sourced material, reshape, destub← Previous edit Revision as of 08:55, 8 June 2014 edit undoJacobisq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,371 editsm Fixing typo raised by BracketBotNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
==External links== ==External links==
* *
* ] *


{{Sigmund Freud}} {{Sigmund Freud}}

Revision as of 08:55, 8 June 2014

"Dostoevsky and Parricide" (Template:Lang-de) is an introductory article contributed by Sigmund Freud to a scholarly collection on The Brothers Karamazov that was published in 1928. The article argues that it is no coincidence that some of the greatest works of world literature - including Oedipus the King, Hamlet, as well as The Brothers Karamazov – all concern parricide, which in Dostoevsky's case Freud links to his epilepsy..

Ernest Jones termed the piece “Freud's last contribution to the psychology of literature and his most brilliant”; Freud himself however called it “this trivial essay. It was written as a favour for someone and written reluctantly”.

Gambling

The second section of Freud's essay turned away from a primary consideration of The Brothers Karamazov to consider the related question of Dostoevsky's gambling. Freud saw gambling as a defiant struggle with Fate (concealing the father figure); the associated guilt was the reason for the gambler's compulsion to lose. As Freud himself put it with reference to Dostoyevsky's wife:

”she had noticed that the one thing which offered any real hope of salvation – his literary production – never went better than when they had lost everything....When his sense of guilt was satisfied by the punishments he had inflicted on himself, the inhibition on his work became less severe.”

See also

3

References

  1. Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (Penguin 1964) p. 590
  2. Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (Penguin 1964) p. 590
  3. Quoted in J. Halliday/P. Fuller eds., The Psychology of Gambling (1974) p. 105
  4. Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 372
  5. S. Freud, 'Dostoevsky and Parricide' in J. Halliday/P. Fuller eds., The Psychology of Gambling (1974) p. 170

Further Reading

  • F. Dostoevsky, The Gambler (Penguin 1971)
  • Joseph Frank, Dostoevsky (197?) Appendix 379-91

External links

Sigmund Freud
Books
Essays
Case studies
Original
concepts
Related
Cultural
depictions
Family
Categories: