| Revision as of 04:46, 1 July 2014 edit101.0.94.153 (talk) →Removing RFC sections← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:20, 1 July 2014 edit undoTheRedPenOfDoom (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers135,756 edits →Removing RFC sections: trollNext edit → | ||
| Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 14:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 14:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Removing RFC sections == | |||
| Please stop removing the "comments by outsiders" section in the ]. Including a section for uninvolved editors is standard in an a request for comment, and there's an example of the same thing in an ] on the same page. If necessary, I can find other RFCs where this was done. You also in general should not remove talk page sections added by another editor. ] (]) 04:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| This also is your notification that all articles about race and intelligence are covered by ]. ] (]) 04:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:20, 1 July 2014
| This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive.
Supriya Pathak
I saw what you did at Supriya Pathak. I asked you nicely but you took it on your ego and vented your frustration by blanking more sections of the page. If you really want to remove unsourced or poorly sourced info then why don't you give some time to other editors so that they can properly add sources.
You are clearly discouraging other editors who are still learning like me. You just want to be superior to others. First you want sources and when you are provided with them, you call them bad and unreliable. You should be encouraging people but it seems like you are on a mission to prove something.
Sorry for my this behavior but you kind of disappointed and demoralized me today. Sorry for bad English. LOL!
Grover again
Hello, the last line on the Karan Singh Grover biography page is unnecessary as KSG has done a lot more work, and I don't see why only Qubool Hai should be mentioned! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkapoor21 (talk • contribs)
Regarding tollywood page
i completly oppesing the merge of an article and i want separte article for it And give me a reason why you are going to merge it Akhil (talk) 22:18 09 May 2014 (UTC)
Wilbraham's Friendly's Article
Why do you hide behind a fictitious screen name? Seriously! Why are you soooooo worried about sources for one little article? Have you ever been to Wilbraham? Also if you click on the Friendly's link it takes you directly to its Misplaced Pages page! And this is the problem with Misplaced Pages, everybody thinks that they have the almighty authority over everyone else! Unless you are an admin DO NOT tell me that I will be blocked from editing! thank you, tom991
I added one time, you are reverting multiple times
I am adding/editing wiki pages in the most efficient manner. It is you who is reverting my edit like a bot machine. The matter might be complained to Yash raj films if you don't stop fake reverts.... stop your fake reverts...
Purple Cow
Stop drinking red bull and being such a wise guy ! !— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjpap (talk • contribs)
June 2014
Your recent editing history at Skin Game (novel) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 03:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sonali Raut may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * ]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sara Loren may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[File:Aditi Rao Hydari, Randeep Hooda and Sara Loren promote MURDER 3.jpg|left|thumb|Sara with [[
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry Hugglemonster may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- }}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kundakka Mandakka may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Ilangovan aka Ilango (]), a middle-class youth, who dreams to get his sister Kavitha (] married to a millionaire. He is very keen on becoming rich and falls
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of programs broadcast by Zee TV may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {div col end}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Salaam Bombay! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''''Salaam Bombay!''''' ( is a 1988 ] directed by ], and screenwritten by her longtime
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:13, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wu Sangui may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | Wú Sānguì (
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mackinac College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MRA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Eltingville
Please stop fighting me on this, its fine don't worry. Grapesoda22 (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Raja
Please correct the article on Raja. Thanks. ArunaKR (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
The Adamant Lankan
Some "editor" has been vandalising Tamil film articles by writing "The satellite rights of the film were bagged by . The film was given a by the Indian Censor Board" in every article he touches, and via multiple IP addresses that always begin with "61.245". In Indian English, "bagged" is a slang term for "buying" or "taking possession of", which is why I hate his edits, as he even ruins formally written sentences with his jargons. Also, he violates WP:FILMRATINGS by mentioning the certificate that any film received (a "U" certificate is equal to the "G" rating). I have checked some of the contributions pages of the IP's he uses, and they includes at least one edit on a Sri Lanka-related article, suggesting where he operates from. Is it possible to block all IP addresses beginning with "61.245" because he never stops at anything? Kailash29792 (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Teja
The article on Teja has multiple issues. ArunaKR (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
What I mean about the article we are both watching.
Hi, TheRedPenOfDoom,
On the article Race Differences in Intelligence, I really mean that I'm not sure that article would survive AfD. There is one way to find out. That is a very obscure book, first mentioned on Misplaced Pages in the article created right after the book was published by a Wikipedian whose single purpose here appeared to be to push the point of view expressed in that book. I agree with you that there is also an undue weight problem of having the encyclopedia report the book's fringe point of view in the voice of the encyclopedia when most reviews of the book by expert reviewers are either tepid or negative, so both problems with the article ought to be vigorously pursued. How would a Wikipedian make an affirmative case today that Misplaced Pages should even have an article devoted to a book like that? -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thecompleteactor.com
ref: . The link itself is not unreliable, because it's the official website of Mohanlal. It can be taken as a case of WP:SELFSOURCE, but I don't think that applies here since the article did not use the link to reference a controversial claim. Ryoga (talk) 12:52, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it is true, but what about it did you find "promotional"? Just curious.This one too. The first sentence could've been retained. Ryoga (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
The Blue Pen of Wisdom
Who is this user named TheBluePenOfWisdom (talk)? Is he any editor who you recently got blocked, and is operating as a sockpuppet to counter you? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- You didn't recognize the style? It's TekkenJinKazama. Atama just blocked a sock FreshiaBomanberham (talk · contribs) that it took me a bit before I was convinced it was Jin. I suspect we'll see new Jin socks for a while. I've already filed the SPI report but this could also be reviewed either as a deliberate parody or impersonation account. Ravensfire (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
BLP violation warning
You revert warred to put a pejorative, misrepresented statement into an article on a living person. Please don't do it again. Cla68 (talk) 04:04, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115600/deepak-chopra-responds-pseudoscience-allegations Dickie birdie (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
DavidJac123 at ANEW
Greetings. After seeing the madness at Race Differences in Intelligence (book), I went ahead and reported DavidJac at ANEW. I believe they are at 7 reverts, or something equally ridiculous. You might be interested in the discussion, which is here. Cheers, Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Mhh, looks like they've been blocked already. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Vandalism at Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai
Your recent edits at Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai, and , while claiming they are removing "excessive unsourced trivia, bad formatting etc" and "unsourced, malformatted, poorly sourced, trivial etc" are actually vandalism because you are replacing information and cast lists from Baal Veer into the article for Sapna Babul Ka...Bidaai. Do you have any particular reason for doing this? Aspects (talk) 20:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Babasaheb B.R. Ambedkar
] You must tell me the reasons as to why you are removing the sourced content. Although I undid my own revision. The source is also being cited from a verifiable content. I know that User Bladesmulti has asked to watch the page. I ask you peacefully to tell me as why you are removing it. What do you do in real life? I hope we can be good friends. Mosesben (talk) 14:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Your recent editing history at Tusshar Kapoor shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Abhi (talk) 14:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)