| Revision as of 00:44, 3 July 2006 editAnsell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,237 edits apply -> may apply in reference to the fact that the whole notability concept is not policy or even a guideline, so why should this be enforceable← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:19, 18 July 2006 edit undo72.138.185.63 (talk) →Criteria for companies and corporationsNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Many Wikipedians are wholly averse to the use of Misplaced Pages for ], and ] is an official policy of long standing. Advertising is either ] to adhere to the ] or deleted. In the latter case, it is listed at ], and Misplaced Pages editors may apply the criteria outlined here. | Many Wikipedians are wholly averse to the use of Misplaced Pages for ], and ] is an official policy of long standing. Advertising is either ] to adhere to the ] or deleted. In the latter case, it is listed at ], and Misplaced Pages editors may apply the criteria outlined here. | ||
| ==Criteria for companies and corporations== | |||
| TANKS OF OTTAWA | |||
| A company or corporation is notable if it meets ''any one'' of the following criteria: | |||
| # The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself. | |||
| jordan tannis has been officialy cut off | |||
| #* This criterion excludes: | |||
| #** Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about itself, and advertising for the company. {{fn|1}} | |||
| #** Trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply report extended shopping hours or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in business directories. | |||
| #* This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. {{fn|2}} | |||
| # The company or corporation is listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications. {{fn|3}} {{fn|4}} | |||
| # The company's or corporation's share price is used to calculate ] {{fn|5}} {{fn|6}}. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises ''the entire market'' is excluded. | |||
| ==Criteria for products and services== | ==Criteria for products and services== | ||
Revision as of 00:19, 18 July 2006
 | This page documents an English Misplaced Pages notability criteria. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. | Shortcut
|
| Notability |
|---|
| General notability guideline |
| Subject-specific guidelines |
| See also |
This page gives some rough guidelines which Misplaced Pages editors use to decide if a company, corporation or other economic entity should have an article on Misplaced Pages.
Many Wikipedians are wholly averse to the use of Misplaced Pages for advertising, and Misplaced Pages articles are not advertisements is an official policy of long standing. Advertising is either cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view or deleted. In the latter case, it is listed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, and Misplaced Pages editors may apply the criteria outlined here.
TANKS OF OTTAWA
jordan tannis has been officialy cut off
Criteria for products and services
A product or service is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:
- The product or service has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.
- This criterion excludes:
- Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about its products or services, and advertising for the product or service. Newspaper stories that do not credit a reporter or a news service and simply present company news in an uncritical or positive way may be treated as press releases unless there is evidence to the contrary. Template:Fn
- Trivial coverage, such as simple price listings in product catalogues.
- This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. Template:Fn
- This criterion excludes:
- The product or service is so well-known that its trademark has suffered from genericization.
Recommendations for products and services
Information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company is so large that this would make the article unwieldy. In that case, it is preferable to keep minor products in lists, and major products in their own article.
The distinction between a 'minor' and a 'major' product is somewhat arbitrary. The main point is that if a lot of information is available on a product, it should be split out, and if little is available, it should be merged into a list.
For instance, if a company has twenty different models of cell phone, and there is little difference between them, then compiling a single article for all of them would help readers in spotting the differences and similarities. On the other hand, a new model of car (as opposed to the same model with an 'extra' or two) is generally rather different and should have its own article.
Chains and franchises
Many companies have chains of local stores or franchises that are individually pretty much interchangeable—for instance, your local McDonald's. Since there is generally very little to say about individual stores or franchises that isn't true for the chain in general, we should not have articles on such individual stores. However, a "List of Wal-Marts in Germany" would be informative. Also, an exception can be made if some major event took place at a local store (however this would most likely be created under an article name which describes the event, not the location. See McDonald's massacre for an example).
Notes
- Template:Fnb Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See Misplaced Pages:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the company, corporation, product or service notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.
- Template:Fnb Two examples: Many people independent of the Mavalli Tiffin Rooms have published their own accounts of eating there. Hewlett-Packard satisfies this criterion by, amongst other things, being covered in a feature article in the Palo Alto Weekly.
- Template:Fnb Examples of company ranking indices: Fortune 500 and Forbes 500
- Template:Fnb Companies listed on the Fortune 500, Forbes 500, etc. will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such rankings will be complete regardless.
- Template:Fnb Examples of such stock market indices: Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, S&P 400, and S&P 600, CAC 40, Nikkei 225, FTSE 100 Index, FTSE 250 Index. See list of stock market indices for more.
- Template:Fnb Companies that form the bases for stock market indices will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such indices will be complete regardless.
- Template:Fnb Two examples: Microsoft Word satisfies this criterion because, amongst many other reasons, people who are wholly independent of Microsoft have written books about it. All cars that have had Haynes Manuals written about them satisfy this criterion.