Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/HyperBac: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:28, 3 July 2006 editRichardcavell (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,910 edits []: delete← Previous edit Revision as of 04:14, 3 July 2006 edit undoAfuller77 (talk | contribs)1 edit []Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
This is probably advertising. Google gives a whopping , and a lot of those seem to be spamming forums, press releases, or submissions by the company rep. The on their website is little help. ] ] 02:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC) This is probably advertising. Google gives a whopping , and a lot of those seem to be spamming forums, press releases, or submissions by the company rep. The on their website is little help. ] ] 02:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't consider this spam nor do I consider it advertising. This is a new and unique product from a small, independent Australian software vendor which is not hurting anyone. I can name about 100 other articles for deletions from multi-national, billion dollar software companies which are allowed to stay, why pick on these guys? '''Strong Keep''' for me. --] 04:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' all ]. ]<sup><font color="darkblue">]</font></sup> 03:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' all ]. ]<sup><font color="darkblue">]</font></sup> 03:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' nn software/advertising --] 03:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' nn software/advertising --] 03:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:14, 3 July 2006

HyperBac

This is probably advertising. Google gives a whopping 29 unique results, and a lot of those seem to be spamming forums, press releases, or submissions by the company rep. The news coverage on their website is little help. Kchase02 T 02:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't consider this spam nor do I consider it advertising. This is a new and unique product from a small, independent Australian software vendor which is not hurting anyone. I can name about 100 other articles for deletions from multi-national, billion dollar software companies which are allowed to stay, why pick on these guys? Strong Keep for me. --Afuller77 04:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)