| Revision as of 07:31, 3 July 2006 editWinhunter (talk | contribs)14,068 edits →[]: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:24, 3 July 2006 edit undoPengo (talk | contribs)Administrators19,328 edits →[]: keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 05:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] 05:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' for failing ] --] <sup>(])</sup> 07:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' for failing ] --] <sup>(])</sup> 07:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' not too spammish, has ] —] 09:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:24, 3 July 2006
HyperBac
This is probably advertising. Google gives a whopping 29 unique results, and a lot of those seem to be spamming forums, press releases, or submissions by the company rep. The news coverage on their website is little help. Kchase02 T 02:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Also fails WP:CORP's section on products.--Kchase02 T 05:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't consider this spam nor do I consider it advertising. This is a new and unique product from a small, independent Australian software vendor which is not hurting anyone. I can name about 100 other articles for deletions from multi-national, billion dollar software companies which are allowed to stay, why pick on these guys? Strong Keep for me. --Afuller77 04:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- user's first edit.--Kchase02 T 04:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete all spam. SM247 03:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn software/advertising --IslaySolomon 03:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:SPAM. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Richardcavell 03:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't have much interest in "compressed disk based backup software for Oracle 9i and 10g", but I suspect that sort of thing does belong in an encyclopedia. After a bit of editing, it's no longer spam. Perhaps we could refocus the discussion about whether the subject is notable or not. --TruthbringerToronto 04:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, product released a month ago with no press or industry coverage that I could find other than company submitted blubs and spam. Their very simple site has exactly one press release and one "customer success" story. Claims are unverifiable; just seems to be another random backup solution for 9i/10g. Kuru 05:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Can't find any references to this company in an Australia New Zealand database. Couldn't find much in the way of verifiable material from reliable third party sources either for this software. Capitalistroadster 05:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 05:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for failing WP:SPAM --WinHunter 07:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep not too spammish, has Utility —Pengo 09:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)