Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:05, 28 July 2014

I dislike the vast bulk of wikipedians, so please go away unless you have pictures of adorable kittens.

A kitten for you!

i understand i was only experamening sorry for all your trouble

Zira456 (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you!

Dolescum, Here is an adorable kitten. Signed, the new user that created Rodli, Beskar, Krueger and Pletcher, S.C.

Wikinnikinnic 01:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

And here is one unrelated to the bicolor twins.

Wikinnikinnic 01:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Thanks Piguy101 (talk) 03:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

User:JapaneseKnoweed

Hi, I recently added a page to Misplaced Pages entitled 'Japanese knotweed claims' which has recently been deleted for unambiguous advertising. Firstly I would like to apologise for transgressing the Misplaced Pages's code of conduct and would like to have another opportunity to write a short bio about Japanese Knotweed Claims again, hopefully the second time will be more acceptable. I was wondering if a) it would be ok to do so and what are the things I should avoid doing so the new page doesn't get deleted. b) what can be done to make things as if the page had never been created, i.e. how to remove the message explaining the deletion and removing the search result for 'Japanese knotweed claims'

simplicity.co.za

Please let me know what to remove of this page to prevent deletion. Gustav.penny (talk) 19:08, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

I changed your proposed deletion to a speedy - db-ad Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Cheers, genuinely wasn't sure if that one would pass on a G11. Dolescum (talk) 10:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for the archiving help at Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate.

Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: SimplyShe

Hello Dolescum. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of SimplyShe, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "world's larget pet fashion supplier" assertion, with refs that at least establish this as a real thing, and with some support for assertion - to WP:AfD? . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 08:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Four sleepy kittehs for you!

So I herd you liek kittens, etc, etc.

--Shirt58 (talk) 12:09, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Dolescum. First , Thank you for your help editing the page I was creating about Suzanne Marie Olsson. I am aware that she had pages on Wiki previously- but eventually these got in to editing wars and she demanded the pages be deleted. This is because people would post a line or two from news articles-just like you did earlier today- and, depending on one's religious views- these segments of sentences could be taken out of context and make Olsson look really bad. That's the purpose behind these false planted articles and she has already explained that. So it is biased and unfair to keep inserting such info when it is known that the person disputes and denies these. Some people would publish these bad lines-("Olsson attempted to break in to the tomb and steal DNA","Olsson claims to be 59th descendant of jesus" et cetera) but not the explanations. If you read the article again, you will see that she had leading archaeologists on the team, and had the approval of the Chief Minister, whom she tells in her book she had been to his home several times. So there was no "break-in" and "Stealing DNA'. If you read further, she states that Laurence Gardner was the first to make this claim about her being descended from the Jesus bloodline. Then she went to investigate and came up with the idea for a DNA Project. She stated clearly that no one could make such claims without DNA or some solid proof. She was being responsible but not getting credit or the facts printed right. Most people just go by the news article without knowing the full background story, and this becomes very misleading. And frustrating. If you read further down the article, she clearly states that some news stories were "fed" to the press falsely and maliciously. I hope you understand. I realize this will probably happen again and again because anyone can edit at Wiki and keep making these same mistakes. I have asked for a speedy deletion of the page. That is best so we avoid misrepresenting anyone. I am so grateful for your help and interest. But it's just not fair to Olsson. Best the page is deleted....it was up for deletion anyway so no one will care. I really do appreciate your understanding! I'll start a new wiki page and hope you will be around to help me again. Granada2000 (talk) 06:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Granada2000Granada2000 (talk) 06:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)