| Revision as of 09:56, 9 August 2014 view sourceJohn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users214,978 edits →Query, and request: t← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:14, 11 August 2014 view source Sphilbrick (talk | contribs)Administrators178,570 edits →Arbitration case request declined: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| Why do you display a "retired" banner, yet continue to contribute? you don't really work on articles any more. edit summary shows a real misunderstanding; read again, more carefully, to see why this sort of argument actually disproves the argument you say you wish to make. I also agree with Bishzilla that we can call out passive-aggressive behaviour such as , without breaking NPA or even CIVIL. I think I see what you are trying to do, and I think your intentions are good; but please consider whether your current actions are promoting your avowed aims or holding them back. --] (]) 09:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC) | Why do you display a "retired" banner, yet continue to contribute? you don't really work on articles any more. edit summary shows a real misunderstanding; read again, more carefully, to see why this sort of argument actually disproves the argument you say you wish to make. I also agree with Bishzilla that we can call out passive-aggressive behaviour such as , without breaking NPA or even CIVIL. I think I see what you are trying to do, and I think your intentions are good; but please consider whether your current actions are promoting your avowed aims or holding them back. --] (]) 09:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration case request declined == | |||
| An arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The arbitrators views on hearing this matter, found , may be useful. For the arbitration committee, --]] 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:14, 11 August 2014
Subpages:
- User:Neotarf/Signpost Arbitration Reports 2013 Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the Signpost during the 2013 arbitration cycle
- User:Neotarf/Arbitration Committee Elections 2013: Neotarf's picks:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections
- User:Neotarf/EditCounterOptIn.js: Enables edit counter
- User talk:Neotarf/ArbCom 2013:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013
- User talk:Neotarf/Arbitration enforcement:Some notes
- User talk:Neotarf/Other stuff
Query, and request
Why do you display a "retired" banner, yet continue to contribute? Though I see you don't really work on articles any more. This edit summary shows a real misunderstanding; read NYB's explanation again, more carefully, to see why this sort of argument actually disproves the argument you say you wish to make. I also agree with Bishzilla that we can call out passive-aggressive behaviour such as yours, without breaking NPA or even CIVIL. I think I see what you are trying to do, and I think your intentions are good; but please consider whether your current actions are promoting your avowed aims or holding them back. --John (talk) 09:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration case request declined
An arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The arbitrators views on hearing this matter, found here, may be useful. For the arbitration committee, --S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)