| Revision as of 08:38, 12 August 2014 view sourceNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:41, 12 August 2014 view source Betafive (talk | contribs)454 edits →question: coolNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Can I ask why you're dicking around with provocative strikethroughs and wikilawyering at AN/I rather than just wiping that shit off your talk page? ] 08:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | Can I ask why you're dicking around with provocative strikethroughs and wikilawyering at AN/I rather than just wiping that shit off your talk page? ] 08:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Well, I asked the guy to remove it himself, so I thought I would give him a chance to show he's not trolling. But maybe yours is the better idea after all. —] (]) 08:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | :Well, I asked the guy to remove it himself, so I thought I would give him a chance to show he's not trolling. But maybe yours is the better idea after all. —] (]) 08:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::Full disclosure: it wasn't my idea, it came from the edit summary in . Peace! ] 08:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:41, 12 August 2014
Subpages:
- User:Neotarf/Signpost Arbitration Reports 2013 Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the Signpost during the 2013 arbitration cycle
- User:Neotarf/Arbitration Committee Elections 2013: Neotarf's picks:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections
- User:Neotarf/EditCounterOptIn.js: Enables edit counter
- User talk:Neotarf/ArbCom 2013:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013
- User talk:Neotarf/Arbitration enforcement:Some notes
- User talk:Neotarf/Other stuff (including link to discussion about "retired" banner)
- User talk:Neotarf/Jimbo civility speech transcript Wikimania civility speech, August 2014
Arbitration case request declined
An arbitration case request in which you were named as a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The arbitrators views on hearing this matter, found here, may be useful. For the arbitration committee, --S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
question
Can I ask why you're dicking around with provocative strikethroughs and wikilawyering at AN/I rather than just wiping that shit off your talk page? betafive 08:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I asked the guy to remove it himself, so I thought I would give him a chance to show he's not trolling. But maybe yours is the better idea after all. —Neotarf (talk) 08:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Full disclosure: it wasn't my idea, it came from the edit summary in this diff. Peace! betafive 08:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)