| Revision as of 08:40, 5 July 2006 editSte4k (talk | contribs)3,630 edits reorg← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:45, 5 July 2006 edit undoNscheffey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,278 edits reply copied from my user pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Explain this remark please. Thanks. ] 20:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | Explain this remark please. Thanks. ] 20:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :A joke based on your preoccupation with ].--]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 20:24, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | :A joke based on your preoccupation with ].--]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 20:24, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == re: == | |||
| ==Otherwise I will curse your user page== | |||
| Adding unsourced information to an article is distinctly different than removing unsourced information from an article. | |||
| Explain this remark please. Thanks. ] 20:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| Per ]: Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it. | |||
| In the future, please provide reputable sources that justify the link that you provided. And please ]. Thank you. ] 08:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :Ste4k, chill out. Both of those links obviously belong in the article and your attempt to remove them has been reverted by another editor. You need to seriously calm down, you are not making any friends with your behavior. --]<sup>(]/])</Sup> 08:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- ********************************************************************************************************* --> | <!-- ********************************************************************************************************* --> | ||
Revision as of 08:45, 5 July 2006
Please place NEW Messages near the TOP of this file. Older Messages will be near the bottom. Thanks! :) |
Continued discussion of your AfD issues
You wrote: " Next you mentioned the other editor who accused you of a bad faith AfD nom, Andrew Parodi. " This is not the person to whom I referred. Thanks. Ste4k 07:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it is the person to whom I referred in the original comment. Who could you have possibly thought I was referring to, seeing as I included a link to his comment? Did you not bother to follow the link before you replied that I didn't understand him correctly, or are so many editors suggesting bad faith noms by you that it's hard to keep them straight? Thanks. --Nscheffey 08:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Note the time of day, please. Thanks. Ste4k 09:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- This might also help jog your memory. Ste4k 09:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ste4k you are one of the most confused/confusing people I have ever interacted with. Let me try to make this simple. When I ask you about another editor suggesting a bad faith nom by you, and then link to said accusation like so, I expect your replies to be concerning THAT EDITOR. The fact that you can't understand that is deeply disconcerting. Also, you have not replied to any of the points in my comment, which I would appreciate. Otherwise I will curse your userpage. --Nscheffey 20:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- By the way, your talk page design breaks the comment button, which is annoying. --Nscheffey 20:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Otherwise I will curse your user page
Explain this remark please. Thanks. Ste4k 20:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- A joke based on your preoccupation with cursed newsgroups.--Nscheffey 20:24, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
re: your latest addition
Adding unsourced information to an article is distinctly different than removing unsourced information from an article.
Per policy: Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.
In the future, please provide reputable sources that justify the link that you provided. And please assume good faith. Thank you. Ste4k 08:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Ste4k, chill out. Both of those links obviously belong in the article and your attempt to remove them has been reverted by another editor. You need to seriously calm down, you are not making any friends with your behavior. --Nscheffey 08:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Archives
| Archive | From | To |
| Archive 2 | Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000 | Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:22:37 +0000 |
| Archive 1 | Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000 | Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:30:10 +0000 |
| Archive 0 | Sat, 17 Jun 2006 05:01.00 +0000 | Sun, 25 Jun 2006 06:04:20 +0000 |