Misplaced Pages

King James Only movement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:20, 19 August 2014 edit107.199.168.97 (talk) too biased← Previous edit Revision as of 02:36, 19 August 2014 edit undoDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,873 edits Reverted 1 edit by 107.199.168.97 (talk): Descriptive and sourced; claim of bias not supported. (TW)Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2014}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2014}}


The "'''King James Only movement'''" advocates the superiority of the Authorized ] (KJV) of the ]. This phrase is disputed and has been described as a term meant to discredit the group of supporters that use this translation to the exclusion of all others. For instance, KJV proponent ] states the term is a "]."<ref>{{cite web | last1 = Waite | first1 = Donald A | authorlink = D. A. Waite | title = King James Only As Slander | number = 1 | date = 2007-02-03 | url = <!-->http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=2307164925 This is a functional url being blocked by the wikipedia spam filter</!--> | accessdate = 2008-03-26 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | last1 = Waite | first1 = Donald A | authorlink = D. A. Waite | title = King James Only As Slander | number = 2 | date = 2007-02-06 | url = <!-->http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=260713240 This is a functional url being blocked by the wikipedia spam filter</!--> | accessdate = 2008-03-26 }}</ref> The "'''King James Only movement'''" advocates the superiority of the Authorized ] (KJV) of the ]. This phrase is disputed and has been described as a term meant to discredit the group of supporters that use this translation to the exclusion of all others. For instance, KJV proponent ] states the term is a "]."<ref>{{cite web | last1 = Waite | first1 = Donald A | authorlink = D. A. Waite | title = King James Only As Slander | number = 1 | date = 2007-02-03 | url = <!-->http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=2307164925 This is a functional url being blocked by the wikipedia spam filter</!--> | accessdate = 2008-03-26 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | last1 = Waite | first1 = Donald A | authorlink = D. A. Waite | title = King James Only As Slander | number = 2 | date = 2007-02-06 | url = <!-->http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=260713240 This is a functional url being blocked by the wikipedia spam filter</!--> | accessdate = 2008-03-26 }}</ref>

Adherents of the movement hold that the King James Version of the Bible is superior to all other English translations, with some teaching that it is the greatest English translation ever penned, needing no further enhancements.<ref>{{Citation | first = GA | last = Riplinger | title = In Awe of Thy Word: Understanding the King James Bible, Its Mystery & History Letter By Letter}}.</ref>{{Page needed |date=March 2014}} It is believed by many that the King James Version has influenced the direction of Christianity more greatly than any other English Bible. Some Christian and Protestant church leaders will use no other translation of the Bible for their individual studies and public preaching. Many King James Bible supporters also cite flaws in the modern English translations.<ref>http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/niv_exposed.htm
</ref><ref>http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/esv.htm</ref><ref>http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NASV/new_american_standard_version_exposed.htm</ref><ref>http://chick.com/bc/2009/lied.asp</ref> They also call into question the manuscripts that the newer versions are translated from.<ref>http://chick.com/reading/books/158/158_44.asp?FROM=biblecenter</ref>
The major reason for many moving away from this translation to newer translations is the outdated readability of the 400-year-old English text contained in this version.<ref name= ":0">{{Citation | publisher = LifeWay Christian Resources | title = Facts & Trends magazine |date=May–Jun 2004}}.</ref>{{Page needed |date=March 2014}} Since languages naturally evolve over time, older translations become more difficult to understand as the language evolves and becomes increasingly different from the older version. Opponents of the King James Only movement propose that this natural ] demands that a Bible translation will eventually need to be replaced by a newer version.
==Variations==
] has divided the King James Only movement into five main classifications:{{Sfn | White | 1995 | pp = 1–4}}

]
* "I Like the KJV Best"&nbsp;– Although White lists this point of view as a subdivision of the KJVO group, this is disputed by some. This group simply regards the KJV as a very good translation and prefers it over other translations because the church they attend uses it, has always used it or prefers its style.
* "The Textual Argument"&nbsp;– This group believes that the KJV's Hebrew and Greek textual base is more accurate than the alternate texts used by newer translations. Many in this group might accept a modern Bible version based on the same Greek and Hebrew manuscripts used for the KJV. White claims ] is a member of this group.{{Sfn | White | 1995 | p = 5}} However, Hodges considers that the ] "corrects" the Received Text. The World English Bible is an example of an English translation that uses the Majority Greek text. The views of the ] fit into this division, but the Trinitarian Bible Society does not believe that the Authorized Version (KJV) is a perfect translation, only that it is the best available translation in the English language.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Watts | first1 = Malcolm H. | title = The Accuracy of the Authorised Version | journal = Quarterly Record | volume = 578 | issue = 1 | page = 8 | publisher = Trinitarian Bible Society | year = 2007 | url = http://www.trinitarianbiblesociety.org/site/qr/qr578.pdf | format= PDF}}</ref> The Society believes this text is superior to the texts used by the ] and other Bible publishers, which use texts that incorporate as their basis a relatively few manuscripts from the 4th century, and some going back to the early 2nd century.<ref>{{Citation | contribution = The Text of the Bible used | publisher = The Trinitarian Bible Society | title = Principles | url = http://trinitarianbiblesociety.org/site/principles.asp}}.</ref>
* "] Only"&nbsp;– This group holds the position that the traditional Greek texts represented in the Textus Receptus are supernaturally (or providentially) preserved and that other Greek manuscripts not used in this compilation may be flawed. The KJV is viewed as an exemplary English translation that is based on this Greek grouping of Bible manuscripts put together by Desiderius Erasmus, but it is also believed that other translations based on these texts have the potential to be of equal quality.
* "The Inspired KJV Group"&nbsp;– This faction believes that the KJV itself was ]. They view the translation to be an English preservation of the very words of God and that they are as accurate as the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts found in its underlying texts. Often this group excludes other English versions based on the same manuscripts, claiming that the KJV is the only English Bible sanctioned by God. They believe that this English translation should never be changed.
* "The KJV As New Revelation"&nbsp;– This group claims that the KJV is a "new revelation" or "advanced revelation" from God, and it should be the standard from which all other translations originate. Adherents to this belief may also believe that the original-languages, Hebrew and Greek, can be corrected by the KJV. This view is often called "Ruckmanism" after ], a staunch advocate of this view.
Note: These last two views have also been referred to as "double inspiration".<ref>{{Cite book | last = Price | first = James D | title = King James Onlyism: A New Sect | publisher = James D. Price Publisher | year = 2006 | page = 279 | isbn = 0-9791147-0-5}}</ref>

These classifications are not mutually exclusive nor are they a comprehensive summary describing those who prefer the KJV. ], for instance, argues that the KJV (or, in his preferred terminology, the Authorized Version) is superior because of its manuscript tradition, its translational philosophy (with updates to the language being regularly necessary), and its ecclesiastical authority, having been created by the church and authorized for use in the church.<ref>{{Cite journal| journal = ] |title=Hearers of the Word |last=Wilson |first=Douglas |authorlink=Douglas Wilson (theologian) |url=http://credenda.org/issues/10-1thema.php |volume=10 |issue=1 |accessdate=2008-07-01 | archiveurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20070927223854/http://credenda.org/issues/10-1thema.php |archivedate = 27 September 2007}}</ref> The KJV's wide availability, popularity and ] status also come into play in addition to any theological preference.


==History== ==History==
The history of the King James Version Only (hereafter KJVO) movement can best be described by a genealogical outline of writers whose books have not only given birth to the movement but also have influenced their doctrines. Dr. James D. Price's book, published in 2006, gives the same information in a summary.<ref>{{Citation | last = Price | first = James D | publisher = Truth | place = ] | url = http://www.truth.sg/resources/KJV%20Onlyism%20-%20a%20New%20Sect%20-%20Introduction%20-%20Dr%20J%20Price.pdf | title = King James Onlyism: A New Sect | page = 4}}.</ref> The history of the King James Version Only (hereafter KJVO) movement can best be described by a genealogical outline of writers whose books have not only given birth to the movement but also have influenced their doctrines. Dr. James D. Price's book, published in 2006, gives the same information in a summary.<ref>{{Citation | last = Price | first = James D | publisher = Truth | place = ] | url = http://www.truth.sg/resources/KJV%20Onlyism%20-%20a%20New%20Sect%20-%20Introduction%20-%20Dr%20J%20Price.pdf | title = King James Onlyism: A New Sect | page = 4}}.</ref>


] (1872–1968), a theology professor and college president, wrote '']'' (1930) in which he attacked the ] Greek text and expressed strong opposition to the ] New Testament (ERV, 1881).{{Sfn | Kutilek | 1998 | loc = second paragraph | ps =: "All writers who embrace…"}} He was the first to apply {{bibleref2|Psalm|12:6–7|KJV}} to the King James Bible, claiming that the reference is a ] for divine preservation of the Scriptures.{{Sfn | Kutilek | 1998 | loc = 2nd paragraph | ps =: "Wilkinson was the first…"}} ] (1872–1968), a staunch ] missionary, theology professor and college president, wrote '']'' (1930) in which he attacked the ] Greek text and expressed strong opposition to the ] New Testament (ERV, 1881).{{Sfn | Kutilek | 1998 | loc = second paragraph | ps =: "All writers who embrace…"}} He was the first to apply {{bibleref2|Psalm|12:6–7|KJV}} to the King James Bible, claiming that the reference is a ] for divine preservation of the Scriptures.{{Sfn | Kutilek | 1998 | loc = 2nd paragraph | ps =: "Wilkinson was the first…"}}

Jasper James Ray (1894–1985), a business manager, missionary and Bible teacher, wrote a similar booklet entitled ''God Wrote Only One Bible'' (1955). {{Sfn | Kutilek | 1998 | loc = 3rd paragraph | ps =: "when J. J. Ray…"}} {{Efn | The relationship of Ray's booklet to Wilkinson’s text is documented in {{Citation | first = Gary | last = Hudson | type = article | url = http://www.baptistboard.com/archive/index.php/t-26782.html | title = The Real Eye Opener | journal = Baptist Biblical Heritage | volume = II | number = 1 | month = Spring | year = 1991}}.}}

] pastor ] (1903–1988) edited a book entitled ''Which Bible?'' published in 1970. It is an anthology by authors such as ] (1856–1930), ] (1932–2008) and others. Almost half of the book is dedicated to the ten out of sixteen chapters from Wilkinson's ''Our Authorized Bible Vindicated''.{{Sfn | Hudson | Kutilek | 1990 | loc = 2nd paragraph | ps =: "But the overwhelmingly longest…"}}

] (1921–), a Baptist preacher, wrote a series of uniformly bound commentaries on various Bible books, topical books on Bible-related subjects and books related to Bible text and translation issues. At least some of his books are characterized by harsh criticism of almost everyone involved in textual criticism, such as ] (1851–1921), ] (1863–1934), ] (1834–]) with the likes of ] (1844–1918) and ] (1878–1969). ''The Christian's Handbook of Manuscript Evidence'' (1970) is among them. Ruckman was influenced by JJ Ray's ''God Wrote Only One Bible'', and Ruckman's ''The Bible Babel'' (1964) is nearly identical to Ray's 1955 book.{{Sfn | Kutilek | 1998 | loc = 11th and 12th paragraph | ps =: "Also in the third generation…"}} Some supporters of the KJVO movement reject Ruckman's position that the King James Version Bible is superior to existing Hebrew and Greek manuscripts,{{Sfn | White | 1995 | pp = 1–4}} and criticize Ruckman because "his writings are so acerbic, offensive and mean-spirited that the entire movement has become identified with his kind of confrontational attitude."{{Sfn | White | 1995 | p = 109}}<ref>{{Citation | first1 = Sam | last1 = Schnaiter | first2 = Ron | last2 = Tagliapietra | title = Bible Preservation and the Providence of God | publisher = Xlibris | year = 2002 | page = 364}}.</ref>


] (1912–81) works Believing Bible Study (1967) and King James Version Defended (1956, 1973) are commonly cited to give support to the KJVO's position, although Hills personally never supported such KJVO positions.{{Sfn | Kutilek | 1998 | loc = 13th paragraph | ps =: "A word needs to be said…"}}
] (1921–), a Baptist preacher, wrote a series of uniformly bound commentaries on various Bible books, topical books on Bible-related subjects and books related to Bible text and translation issues.


] (1947–), known for her book ''New Age Bible Versions'' and a number of other works, has also addressed in some detail the issue of differences in current editions of the King James Bible.<ref>{{cite web | first = Gail A | last = Riplinger | title = Settings of the King James Bible | publisher = Our KJV | author-link = G. A. Riplinger |url= http://www.ourkjv.com/KJB.pdf | format = ]}}</ref> ] (1947–), known for her book ''New Age Bible Versions'' and a number of other works, has also addressed in some detail the issue of differences in current editions of the King James Bible.<ref>{{cite web | first = Gail A | last = Riplinger | title = Settings of the King James Bible | publisher = Our KJV | author-link = G. A. Riplinger |url= http://www.ourkjv.com/KJB.pdf | format = ]}}</ref> However, a lengthy critical review of her book ''New Age Bible Versions'', originally published in Cornerstone magazine in 1994, authored by Bob and Gretchen Passantino of Answers In Action, described the book as "erroneous, sensationalistic, misrepresentative, inaccurate, and logically indefensible."<ref>{{Citation | url = http://answers.org/bookreviews/newagevers.html | title = New age vers. | publisher = Answers | type = book review}}</ref>


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 02:36, 19 August 2014

The First Page of the Book of Genesis in the 1611 printing of the KJV

The "King James Only movement" advocates the superiority of the Authorized King James Version (KJV) of the Protestant Bible. This phrase is disputed and has been described as a term meant to discredit the group of supporters that use this translation to the exclusion of all others. For instance, KJV proponent D. A. Waite states the term is a "smear word."

Adherents of the movement hold that the King James Version of the Bible is superior to all other English translations, with some teaching that it is the greatest English translation ever penned, needing no further enhancements. It is believed by many that the King James Version has influenced the direction of Christianity more greatly than any other English Bible. Some Christian and Protestant church leaders will use no other translation of the Bible for their individual studies and public preaching. Many King James Bible supporters also cite flaws in the modern English translations. They also call into question the manuscripts that the newer versions are translated from. The major reason for many moving away from this translation to newer translations is the outdated readability of the 400-year-old English text contained in this version. Since languages naturally evolve over time, older translations become more difficult to understand as the language evolves and becomes increasingly different from the older version. Opponents of the King James Only movement propose that this natural evolution of language demands that a Bible translation will eventually need to be replaced by a newer version.

Variations

James White has divided the King James Only movement into five main classifications:

Church sign indicating that the congregation uses the Authorized King James Version of 1611.
  • "I Like the KJV Best" – Although White lists this point of view as a subdivision of the KJVO group, this is disputed by some. This group simply regards the KJV as a very good translation and prefers it over other translations because the church they attend uses it, has always used it or prefers its style.
  • "The Textual Argument" – This group believes that the KJV's Hebrew and Greek textual base is more accurate than the alternate texts used by newer translations. Many in this group might accept a modern Bible version based on the same Greek and Hebrew manuscripts used for the KJV. White claims Zane C. Hodges is a member of this group. However, Hodges considers that the Majority Text "corrects" the Received Text. The World English Bible is an example of an English translation that uses the Majority Greek text. The views of the Trinitarian Bible Society fit into this division, but the Trinitarian Bible Society does not believe that the Authorized Version (KJV) is a perfect translation, only that it is the best available translation in the English language. The Society believes this text is superior to the texts used by the United Bible Societies and other Bible publishers, which use texts that incorporate as their basis a relatively few manuscripts from the 4th century, and some going back to the early 2nd century.
  • "Received Text Only" – This group holds the position that the traditional Greek texts represented in the Textus Receptus are supernaturally (or providentially) preserved and that other Greek manuscripts not used in this compilation may be flawed. The KJV is viewed as an exemplary English translation that is based on this Greek grouping of Bible manuscripts put together by Desiderius Erasmus, but it is also believed that other translations based on these texts have the potential to be of equal quality.
  • "The Inspired KJV Group" – This faction believes that the KJV itself was divinely inspired. They view the translation to be an English preservation of the very words of God and that they are as accurate as the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts found in its underlying texts. Often this group excludes other English versions based on the same manuscripts, claiming that the KJV is the only English Bible sanctioned by God. They believe that this English translation should never be changed.
  • "The KJV As New Revelation" – This group claims that the KJV is a "new revelation" or "advanced revelation" from God, and it should be the standard from which all other translations originate. Adherents to this belief may also believe that the original-languages, Hebrew and Greek, can be corrected by the KJV. This view is often called "Ruckmanism" after Peter Ruckman, a staunch advocate of this view.

Note: These last two views have also been referred to as "double inspiration".

These classifications are not mutually exclusive nor are they a comprehensive summary describing those who prefer the KJV. Douglas Wilson, for instance, argues that the KJV (or, in his preferred terminology, the Authorized Version) is superior because of its manuscript tradition, its translational philosophy (with updates to the language being regularly necessary), and its ecclesiastical authority, having been created by the church and authorized for use in the church. The KJV's wide availability, popularity and public domain status also come into play in addition to any theological preference.

History

The history of the King James Version Only (hereafter KJVO) movement can best be described by a genealogical outline of writers whose books have not only given birth to the movement but also have influenced their doctrines. Dr. James D. Price's book, published in 2006, gives the same information in a summary.

Benjamin G. Wilkinson (1872–1968), a staunch Seventh-day Adventist missionary, theology professor and college president, wrote Our Authorized Bible Vindicated (1930) in which he attacked the Westcott-Hort Greek text and expressed strong opposition to the English Revised Version New Testament (ERV, 1881). He was the first to apply Psalm 12:6–7 to the King James Bible, claiming that the reference is a prooftext for divine preservation of the Scriptures.

Jasper James Ray (1894–1985), a business manager, missionary and Bible teacher, wrote a similar booklet entitled God Wrote Only One Bible (1955).

Regular Baptist pastor David Otis Fuller (1903–1988) edited a book entitled Which Bible? published in 1970. It is an anthology by authors such as Robert Dick Wilson (1856–1930), Zane Clark Hodges (1932–2008) and others. Almost half of the book is dedicated to the ten out of sixteen chapters from Wilkinson's Our Authorized Bible Vindicated.

Peter Sturges Ruckman (1921–), a Baptist preacher, wrote a series of uniformly bound commentaries on various Bible books, topical books on Bible-related subjects and books related to Bible text and translation issues. At least some of his books are characterized by harsh criticism of almost everyone involved in textual criticism, such as Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield (1851–1921), Archibald Thomas Robertson (1863–1934), Charles Haddon Spurgeon (1834–92) with the likes of Julius Wellhausen (1844–1918) and Harry Emerson Fosdick (1878–1969). The Christian's Handbook of Manuscript Evidence (1970) is among them. Ruckman was influenced by JJ Ray's God Wrote Only One Bible, and Ruckman's The Bible Babel (1964) is nearly identical to Ray's 1955 book. Some supporters of the KJVO movement reject Ruckman's position that the King James Version Bible is superior to existing Hebrew and Greek manuscripts, and criticize Ruckman because "his writings are so acerbic, offensive and mean-spirited that the entire movement has become identified with his kind of confrontational attitude."

Edward F. Hills (1912–81) works Believing Bible Study (1967) and King James Version Defended (1956, 1973) are commonly cited to give support to the KJVO's position, although Hills personally never supported such KJVO positions.

Gail Riplinger (1947–), known for her book New Age Bible Versions and a number of other works, has also addressed in some detail the issue of differences in current editions of the King James Bible. However, a lengthy critical review of her book New Age Bible Versions, originally published in Cornerstone magazine in 1994, authored by Bob and Gretchen Passantino of Answers In Action, described the book as "erroneous, sensationalistic, misrepresentative, inaccurate, and logically indefensible."

See also

Notes

  1. The relationship of Ray's booklet to Wilkinson’s text is documented in Hudson, Gary (1991), "The Real Eye Opener", Baptist Biblical Heritage (article), II (1) {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help).

References

  1. Waite, Donald A (3 February 2007). "King James Only As Slander". {{cite web}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
  2. Waite, Donald A (6 February 2007). "King James Only As Slander". {{cite web}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
  3. Riplinger, GA, In Awe of Thy Word: Understanding the King James Bible, Its Mystery & History Letter By Letter.
  4. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/niv_exposed.htm
  5. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/esv.htm
  6. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NASV/new_american_standard_version_exposed.htm
  7. http://chick.com/bc/2009/lied.asp
  8. http://chick.com/reading/books/158/158_44.asp?FROM=biblecenter
  9. Facts & Trends magazine, LifeWay Christian Resources, May–June 2004.
  10. ^ White 1995, pp. 1–4.
  11. White 1995, p. 5.
  12. Watts, Malcolm H. (2007). "The Accuracy of the Authorised Version" (PDF). Quarterly Record. 578 (1). Trinitarian Bible Society: 8.
  13. "The Text of the Bible used", Principles, The Trinitarian Bible Society.
  14. Price, James D (2006). King James Onlyism: A New Sect. James D. Price Publisher. p. 279. ISBN 0-9791147-0-5.
  15. Wilson, Douglas. "Hearers of the Word". Credenda/Agenda. 10 (1). Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 1 July 2008.
  16. Price, James D, King James Onlyism: A New Sect (PDF), SG: Truth, p. 4.
  17. Kutilek 1998, second paragraph: "All writers who embrace…"
  18. Kutilek 1998, 2nd paragraph: "Wilkinson was the first…"
  19. Kutilek 1998, 3rd paragraph: "when J. J. Ray…"
  20. Hudson & Kutilek 1990, 2nd paragraph: "But the overwhelmingly longest…"
  21. Kutilek 1998, 11th and 12th paragraph: "Also in the third generation…"
  22. White 1995, p. 109.
  23. Schnaiter, Sam; Tagliapietra, Ron (2002), Bible Preservation and the Providence of God, Xlibris, p. 364.
  24. Kutilek 1998, 13th paragraph: "A word needs to be said…"
  25. Riplinger, Gail A. "Settings of the King James Bible" (PDF). Our KJV.
  26. New age vers. (book review), Answers

Bibliography

Further reading

External links

Pro King James Only

Anti King James Only

Categories: