Misplaced Pages

:Copyright problems/2014 September 3: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:56, 3 September 2014 editSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits no idea if this is disruption or a newbie error but there is no copyvio← Previous edit Revision as of 19:12, 3 September 2014 edit undoJustlettersandnumbers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators120,807 edits headerNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==== ] ====
{{Collapse top|Suspected copyright violations (bot reports)}}
]
{{Misplaced Pages:Suspected copyright violations/2014-09-03 }}
{{Collapse bottom}}
<!-- This is Cppage. Comment used by User:DumbBOT, do not remove or change -->
===== Copyright investigations (manual article tagging) =====
* {{anchor|:India Against Corruption}}] <span class="plainlinks">( · · ])</span> from http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.net/blog/ramdevji-06-april-2011-jantar-mantar-iac-email-p9a156ky12txt * {{anchor|:India Against Corruption}}] <span class="plainlinks">( · · ])</span> from http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.net/blog/ramdevji-06-april-2011-jantar-mantar-iac-email-p9a156ky12txt
:*I've never idea if this is a newbie mistake or yet another instance of the long-running disruption by supporters of the India Against Corruption pressure group who have been hauled before ] and other venues on numerous occasions. In any event, there is absolutely no copyright violation in the tagged section and I'd be surprised if there is any in the article at all (mainly, I must admit, because it was mostly rewritten by me ages ago). - ] (]) 09:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC) :*I've never idea if this is a newbie mistake or yet another instance of the long-running disruption by supporters of the India Against Corruption pressure group who have been hauled before ] and other venues on numerous occasions. In any event, there is absolutely no copyright violation in the tagged section and I'd be surprised if there is any in the article at all (mainly, I must admit, because it was mostly rewritten by me ages ago). - ] (]) 09:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:12, 3 September 2014

3 September 2014

Suspected copyright violations (bot reports)

SCV for 2014-09-03 Edit

2014-09-03 (Suspected copyright violations)
User_talk:Sargdub#Attribution_requested--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
User_talk:Sargdub#Attribution_requested--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Lists can be challenging, but I agree with your assessment.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Left a note at User_talk:Melopeeks#Draft:Daikin_Europe--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
I delete drafts all the time for spam and/or copyvio reasons. This is no exception. MER-C 13:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • I've never idea if this is a newbie mistake or yet another instance of the long-running disruption by supporters of the India Against Corruption pressure group who have been hauled before WP:ANI and other venues on numerous occasions. In any event, there is absolutely no copyright violation in the tagged section and I'd be surprised if there is any in the article at all (mainly, I must admit, because it was mostly rewritten by me ages ago). - Sitush (talk) 09:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)