Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fadix: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:02, 7 July 2006 edit69.196.164.190 (talk) I think you SHould say something← Previous edit Revision as of 00:23, 8 July 2006 edit undo69.196.164.190 (talk) I think you SHould say somethingNext edit →
Line 39: Line 39:


Thanks ] Thanks ]

FYI:The way you see me conduct myself in the NK article is the same way I conduct myself in other articles. ]

Revision as of 00:23, 8 July 2006

.

Civility, privacy

First of all, even though you claim to have 'left', continuing to edit any pages means that you are still subject to wikipedia policies. I have removed the IRC chat logs you posted above, as copy/pasting IRC transcripts is STRICTLY forbidden without the express consent of all parties involved. Secondly, I've removed the personal attack you made in your rant above. If you continue, you may be blocked and your talk page protected from editing if you continue. --InShaneee 15:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Where can I find a concise account of what happned? I see a 3-day block accompanied with "personal attacks, threats of more." Please cite individual diffs. Thanks in advance. El_C 05:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
On 2nd look, this block took place nearly two weeks ago, so it has become academic incidents-wise, and otherwise, should be structured in an RfC format. You're free to do so, of course. I'd say, you should return, and in the future, if you need a 2nd administrative opinion on another admin's action , drop me a line. El_C 05:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

yüzde

I did not make that mistake before. I remember clearly correcting one... anyway by coming up with a translation I guess I have already passed that step.neurobio 19:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

by the way you are wrong about deepblue. He is not Holdwater. Holdwater is not here for the time beeing.neurobio 19:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Torque may be holdwater I dont know. but despite your advanced observation skills and devotion I have to say that Deep is not. that is my feeling you will continue to believe in yours. So you can speak Turkish? Indicating that we are dealing with the elites of the diaspora. And maybe someday Holwater was here too. wikipedia turned out to be much more that I expected. may I just ask your age? oproximately?neurobio 22:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

you may be right about the diaspora I have no clue. what I observed is Armenians from Armenia are so different from dispora armenians. I guess you are very well aware that I am a rookie. Actually I havent read a single book about the subject before coming here an strugling with you. but to see why I am so sure and will be devoted see Marshal Bayramyans talk page under the title Correct (there may be some words there about you that you may not like). I am ready to belive your claim about you being neutral in article but your remarks about Katchazuni (trying to discredit what he writes) and accepting charney as a reliable source with a face vaule is much much questionable. And you come up with so careles claims that you refrained from doing while facing Torque also makes me think that you make things up (or using thinks that are previously made up) when facing people who are not so well eqipped. And for gods sake it is so obvious that there were hardly 1.6 milion Armenians at that time how do you insinst and claim 1.5 killed or 2 mil lived in ottoman empire? Anyway We will always be opposing each other in this issue but there is no need to be incivil.neurobio 00:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

i got a very bad answer from marshal and erasing my edits from his pageneurobio 00:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

well what can i say. you are right in some issues. The forged idendity is just a mistake but it still is not completey forged. I came here thinking that it is just another forum. I was not aware this was so serious. once I started and it had to go on. I am sorry. I still think that you are a trouble maker and i have told much worse things to you before, no need to mention that. and I will of course try to do anything to chance the article. Besides that picture was really doubtfull. I did not wish to change it anyway because i knew you will come up with a worse one. you erased it and i had to put a new one. I act this way because before even reading anybook I knew every thing from my family just like your eye withneses, we have also our victims and if anyone who has killed people of my family comes and blames us of genocide and denial then i will go crazy. I am also a children of a survivor. You should not be surprised of my rage. You always ask for respect but show no respect to our deaths. I dont like you not because you are armenian but you know you are adding lies. I can understand others naive armenians who are much less knowledgabele. but you... you should know you are adding lies.neurobio 01:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

and finally I dont think deep is holdwater because I mailed TAT with my original name and same mail adress I used here and talked about wiki and holdwater said he has no time. Here Deep assumed that I am really foreigner and wrote a long answer to me about turkish position.neurobio 02:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

test

Template:CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat

File:Armin wegner-pile of bodies-DSC 0124.JPG
Armenian Genocide photo. Armin T. Wegner © Wallstein Verlag, Göttingen. All rights reserved.

Photo

I don't think the photo you've posted should be included especially with an Armenian Genocide phrase in the caption. But I'll leave that to others to decide. I just want to say that I wanted to revert Karl Meire's edits, did not intend to revert the photo. If you include the photo again, I'm not going to revert it. 24.211.192.250 17:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Assume good faith

What can I do to have you assume good faith with me? Was any of my edits done in bad faith? Please let me know. May be we can work things out one-on-one easier than on the talk page. 24.211.192.250 05:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I think you SHould say something

This manipulative behaviour has gone far enough and is very frustrating to the editorial environmnet. I think you should say something here . Enough is enough; we should be able to edit rationally.

Thanks 69.196.164.190

FYI:The way you see me conduct myself in the NK article is the same way I conduct myself in other articles. 69.196.164.190