| Revision as of 22:35, 1 October 2014 editMaunus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,250 edits →Notable hereditarians: remove entire list pending sourcing.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:44, 22 January 2015 edit undoWaters.Justin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,405 editsm added template and citation needed tags.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{refimprove|date=February 2013}} | {{refimprove|date=February 2013}} | ||
| '''Hereditarianism''' is the doctrine or school of thought that ] plays a significant role in determining ] and character traits, such as ] and ]. Hereditarians believe in the power of ] to explain human character traits and solve human social and political problems. Hereditarians adopt the view that an understanding of ] can extend the understanding of human nature. They have explicitly abandoned the ]. | '''Hereditarianism''' is the doctrine or school of thought that ] plays a significant role in determining ] and character traits, such as ] and ]. Hereditarians believe in the power of ] to explain human character traits and solve human social and political problems. Hereditarians adopt the view that an understanding of ] can extend the understanding of human nature. They have explicitly abandoned the ].{{citation needed}} | ||
| == Competing theories == | == Competing theories == | ||
| Theories opposed to hereditarianism include ], ] and ]. This disagreement and controversy is part of the ] debate. | Theories opposed to hereditarianism include ], ] and ].{{Citation needed}} This disagreement and controversy is part of the ] debate. | ||
| Hereditarianism is sometimes used as a ] for ] or ], though some scholars distinguish the two terms. When distinguished, biological determinism is used to mean that heredity is the only factor. Supporters of hereditarianism reject this sense of biological determinism for most cases. However, in some cases genetic determinism is true; for example, ] describes Huntington's disease as "pure fatalism, undiluted by environmental variability."<ref>{{cite book |last=Ridley |first=Matt |title=Genome: the autobiography of a species in 23 chapters |year=1999 |publisher=Harper Collins |isbn=0-06-019497-9}}</ref> In other cases, hereditarians would see no role for genes; for example, the condition of "''not knowing a word of Chinese''" has nothing to do (directly) with genes.<ref>{{cite book |last=Dennett |first=Daniel |title=Freedom Evolves |publisher=Viking Press |location=New York |year=2003 |isbn=0-670-03186-0}}</ref> In individual cases, hereditarians believe that genes play an intermediate role, while genes largely determine the differences between the human races and genders. In all cases, they believe this is an empirical and not a philosophical question. | Hereditarianism is sometimes used as a ] for ] or ], though some scholars distinguish the two terms. When distinguished, biological determinism is used to mean that heredity is the only factor. Supporters of hereditarianism reject this sense of biological determinism for most cases. However, in some cases genetic determinism is true; for example, ] describes Huntington's disease as "pure fatalism, undiluted by environmental variability."<ref>{{cite book |last=Ridley |first=Matt |title=Genome: the autobiography of a species in 23 chapters |year=1999 |publisher=Harper Collins |isbn=0-06-019497-9}}</ref> In other cases, hereditarians would see no role for genes; for example, the condition of "''not knowing a word of Chinese''" has nothing to do (directly) with genes.<ref>{{cite book |last=Dennett |first=Daniel |title=Freedom Evolves |publisher=Viking Press |location=New York |year=2003 |isbn=0-670-03186-0}}</ref> In individual cases, hereditarians believe that genes play an intermediate role, while genes largely determine the differences between the human races and genders. In all cases, they believe this is an empirical and not a philosophical question. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| {{col begin}} | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | |||
| {{col end}} | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 22 January 2015
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Hereditarianism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Hereditarianism is the doctrine or school of thought that heredity plays a significant role in determining human nature and character traits, such as intelligence and personality. Hereditarians believe in the power of genetics to explain human character traits and solve human social and political problems. Hereditarians adopt the view that an understanding of human evolution can extend the understanding of human nature. They have explicitly abandoned the standard social science model.
Competing theories
Theories opposed to hereditarianism include behaviorism, social determinism and environmental determinism. This disagreement and controversy is part of the nature versus nurture debate.
Hereditarianism is sometimes used as a synonym for biological or genetic determinism, though some scholars distinguish the two terms. When distinguished, biological determinism is used to mean that heredity is the only factor. Supporters of hereditarianism reject this sense of biological determinism for most cases. However, in some cases genetic determinism is true; for example, Matt Ridley describes Huntington's disease as "pure fatalism, undiluted by environmental variability." In other cases, hereditarians would see no role for genes; for example, the condition of "not knowing a word of Chinese" has nothing to do (directly) with genes. In individual cases, hereditarians believe that genes play an intermediate role, while genes largely determine the differences between the human races and genders. In all cases, they believe this is an empirical and not a philosophical question.
Political implications
Pastore has claimed that hereditarians were more likely to be conservative, that they view social and economic inequality as a natural result of variation in talent and character. Thus, likewise they explain class and race differences as the result of partly genetic group differences. He contrasted this with the claim that behaviorists were more likely to be liberals or leftists, that they believe economic disadvantage and structural problems in the social order were to blame for group differences.
However, the historical correspondence between hereditarianism and conservatism has broken down at least among proponents of hereditarianism. Philosopher Peter Singer describes his vision of a new liberal political view that embraces hereditarianism in his 1999 book.
The Pioneer Fund, established in 1937 to support academic research into the problem of heredity and eugenics and the problems of human race betterment, is now a leading source of funding for scientists wishing to investigate hereditarian hypotheses.
See also
- Behavioural genetics
- Biological determinism
- Eugenics
- Social Darwinism
- Planned Parenthood
- Scientific racism
- Sociobiology
See also
References
- Ridley, Matt (1999). Genome: the autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. Harper Collins. ISBN 0-06-019497-9.
- Dennett, Daniel (2003). Freedom Evolves. New York: Viking Press. ISBN 0-670-03186-0.
- Pastore, Nicolas (1949). The Nature-Nurture Controversy. New York: King's Crown Press.
- Singer, Peter (1999). A Darwinian Left. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-08323-8.
- Mehler B. . in Chambliss JJ, (ed.) Philosophy of Education: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland 1996.