Revision as of 16:26, 5 October 2014 editAndrew Davidson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,493 edits →Korean influence on Japanese culture: on sources &c.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:47, 5 October 2014 edit undoAndrew Davidson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,493 editsm →Korean influence on Japanese culture: andNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::None of those articles are comparable, since they are not in the form "<Modern nation-state that didn't exist yet during the relevant time period> influence on the ''culture'' of <Other modern nation-state that didn't exist yet during the relevant time period>". The more accurate name for 90% of this material would be "Baekje influence on late-Yayoi culture". Many of your examples don't include the relevant word "culture", as well, and please see ]. As to the book: have you read it? It's author has no visible credentials in Japanese studies, the publisher is a specialist in English-language travel guides on South Korea, the book almost certainly fails ], and a lot of it is downright offensive to boot. ] (<small>]]</small>) 23:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC) | ::None of those articles are comparable, since they are not in the form "<Modern nation-state that didn't exist yet during the relevant time period> influence on the ''culture'' of <Other modern nation-state that didn't exist yet during the relevant time period>". The more accurate name for 90% of this material would be "Baekje influence on late-Yayoi culture". Many of your examples don't include the relevant word "culture", as well, and please see ]. As to the book: have you read it? It's author has no visible credentials in Japanese studies, the publisher is a specialist in English-language travel guides on South Korea, the book almost certainly fails ], and a lot of it is downright offensive to boot. ] (<small>]]</small>) 23:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Plus, books with "hidden history" in their subtitle tend to be ], and ]s who cite such books -- including the article's creator and several later contributors -- tend to be ] to ]. ] (<small>]]</small>) 14:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | ::Plus, books with "hidden history" in their subtitle tend to be ], and ]s who cite such books -- including the article's creator and several later contributors -- tend to be ] to ]. ] (<small>]]</small>) 14:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::* That source seems fine and, in any case, is not the only one out there. I browse a little and soon find — an account of the influence of the Paekche of Korea on Japan. This work is published by a university press and so demonstrates further confirms the notability and the scholarly nature of the topic. Our corresponding article references the page in question in its section ], giving it as a main article. This demonstrates that the page in question is interwoven with our other content and is not some fringe fork as you seem to suppose. As for righting great wrongs, you seem to be the one on a mission here as your ] indicates you've been grinding this axe for months now. ] (]) 16:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | :::* That source seems fine and, in any case, is not the only one out there. I browse a little and soon find — an account of the influence of the Paekche of Korea on Japan. This work is published by a university press and so demonstrates and further confirms the notability and the scholarly nature of the topic. Our corresponding article references the page in question in its section ], giving it as a main article. This demonstrates that the page in question is interwoven with our other content and is not some fringe fork as you seem to suppose. As for righting great wrongs, you seem to be the one on a mission here as your ] indicates you've been grinding this axe for months now. ] (]) 16:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 16:47, 5 October 2014
Korean influence on Japanese culture
- Korean influence on Japanese culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As already thoroughly demonstrated on the talk page, the article is a WP:POVFORK of a whole bunch of better articles on Japanese culture that may or may not mention hypothetical Korean connections for the topics mentioned. It has stitched together a bunch of sources that either (1) present Korean connection as one (the less likely?) of several possible theories of a cultural artifact's origins, (2) are written by Korean nationalists with no training in Japanese culture, or (3) don't mention "Korean influence" at all, but refer to a Japanese-born and Japanese-raised originator, whose remote ancestors might have immigrated from the Korean Peninsula. The topics Chinese influence on Japanese culture, European influence on Japanese culture and United States influence on Japanese culture are almost certainly more notable, but we don't have articles on those topics -- or, for that matter, any other articles with titles in the form "<Country Y> influence on the culture of <Country X>" -- because such articles by definition would violate WP:WEIGHT, WP:SYNTH, WP:NPOV and more. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 07:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 4. —cyberbot I Online 08:10, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep We have other articles of this sort and examples include Olmec influences on Mesoamerican cultures, European influence in Afghanistan, Spanish influence on Filipino culture, Islamic influences on Western art. In this case, there's an entire book on the topic and so the topic is notable. The worst case would be merger to another page such as History of Japan–Korea relations and so there's no case for deletion. Andrew (talk) 16:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- None of those articles are comparable, since they are not in the form "<Modern nation-state that didn't exist yet during the relevant time period> influence on the culture of <Other modern nation-state that didn't exist yet during the relevant time period>". The more accurate name for 90% of this material would be "Baekje influence on late-Yayoi culture". Many of your examples don't include the relevant word "culture", as well, and please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. As to the book: have you read it? It's author has no visible credentials in Japanese studies, the publisher is a specialist in English-language travel guides on South Korea, the book almost certainly fails WP:RS, and a lot of it is downright offensive to boot. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 23:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Plus, books with "hidden history" in their subtitle tend to be WP:FRINGE, and WP:SPAs who cite such books -- including the article's creator and several later contributors -- tend to be here to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 14:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- That source seems fine and, in any case, is not the only one out there. I browse a little and soon find this — an account of the influence of the Paekche of Korea on Japan. This work is published by a university press and so demonstrates and further confirms the notability and the scholarly nature of the topic. Our corresponding article references the page in question in its section Baekje#Relations_with_Japan, giving it as a main article. This demonstrates that the page in question is interwoven with our other content and is not some fringe fork as you seem to suppose. As for righting great wrongs, you seem to be the one on a mission here as your sandbox indicates you've been grinding this axe for months now. Andrew (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 17:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 17:21, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 17:22, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 17:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- No preference, but Japanese culture might be a better location for some of this. The current article has grammar issues throughout, and does seem to have a severe slant toward presenting Korean culture as influencing practically everything in Japan without presenting dissenting academic opinions and research. If this article is not deleted, it will definitely need a serious overhaul, and shepherding from editors willing to work together and put any nationalism aside in that effort. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: This is of no real value to English-speaking readers. Most importantly, there is no need for generic articles "Influence of France on English culture" (to give an example closer to (my) home), because such influence is general, all-pervasive, and obvious. In this specific case, of course, both Korea and Japan went through many centuries under the influence of Chinese civilisation, and Korea is geographically in the middle, so obviously it is possible to make a hodge-podge list of "connections", but this does not an encyclopaedia article make. Imaginatorium (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2014 (UTC)