| Revision as of 14:44, 9 July 2006 editTobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 edits →[]: move my comment upwards. should refer to coredesat← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:04, 9 July 2006 edit undoTobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 edits →[]: reply to Baumfabrik. greets to my new stalker PschempNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ** comment ] ''Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, '''it's because the work is not yet notable enough to have attracted anyone else's attention.''' Articles of this sort are known as vanity pages and are usually deleted. Misplaced Pages does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Misplaced Pages to popularize them.'' - '''a page with 4000 visits a day certainly attracts attention already.''' ] ] 04:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ** comment ] ''Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, '''it's because the work is not yet notable enough to have attracted anyone else's attention.''' Articles of this sort are known as vanity pages and are usually deleted. Misplaced Pages does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Misplaced Pages to popularize them.'' - '''a page with 4000 visits a day certainly attracts attention already.''' ] ] 04:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::I'm slightly confused here, Tobias; are you voting for the deletion of the article that you created which refers to your own website? --] 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ::I'm slightly confused here, Tobias; are you voting for the deletion of the article that you created which refers to your own website? --] 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::Thanks for asking. No I am not voting for the deletion. The website is the second most used among tango dancers, so I don't really understand why you vote for deletion. It also has some unique feature which make it valuable for tango music collectors. I very often tried to bring tango people to edit in wikipedia, but most of them simply don't do it, sometimes because they don't like WP very much. I wrote the article myself, since I know the website quite good. I also started an article on ] - nobody accuses me of vanity there. I also started ], ], ], ], I edited other tango related articles. I created lots of stubs for locations where tango people where born. I asked lot of people to create basic tango articles in other language wikipedias, since I don't speak romanian etc. I love tango. And if I am not sleeping I either dance it or develop ] or edit in wikipedia. ] ] 15:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' - vanity, website run by article author, completely non-notable. ] | ] 04:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - vanity, website run by article author, completely non-notable. ] | ] 04:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **Hi Stalker. I know you hate me. Are you on a crusade against me? Could you explain ] with respect to tango.info? ] ] 15:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:04, 9 July 2006
Tango.info
Hmm, this article survived VfD last year, but I think this article should be wiped per WP:WEB and WP:SPAM, and for reminding me of that big fat bald orange bloke. die Baumfabrik 09:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri @ 09:49, July 8, 2006
- Delete per nom. Emc² (CONTACT ME) 14:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This probably should not have been kept based on the previous VfD. Fails WP:WEB and WP:SPAM. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- comment WP:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, it's because the work is not yet notable enough to have attracted anyone else's attention. Articles of this sort are known as vanity pages and are usually deleted. Misplaced Pages does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Misplaced Pages to popularize them. - a page with 4000 visits a day certainly attracts attention already. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm slightly confused here, Tobias; are you voting for the deletion of the article that you created which refers to your own website? --die Baumfabrik 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking. No I am not voting for the deletion. The website is the second most used among tango dancers, so I don't really understand why you vote for deletion. It also has some unique feature which make it valuable for tango music collectors. I very often tried to bring tango people to edit in wikipedia, but most of them simply don't do it, sometimes because they don't like WP very much. I wrote the article myself, since I know the website quite good. I also started an article on todotango.com - nobody accuses me of vanity there. I also started List of tango music labels, List of tango singers, List of public domain tangos, Sociedad Argentina de Autores y Compositores de Música, I edited other tango related articles. I created lots of stubs for locations where tango people where born. I asked lot of people to create basic tango articles in other language wikipedias, since I don't speak romanian etc. I love tango. And if I am not sleeping I either dance it or develop tango.info or edit in wikipedia. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 15:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm slightly confused here, Tobias; are you voting for the deletion of the article that you created which refers to your own website? --die Baumfabrik 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - vanity, website run by article author, completely non-notable. pschemp | talk 04:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Stalker. I know you hate me. Are you on a crusade against me? Could you explain completely non-notable with respect to tango.info? Tobias Conradi (Talk) 15:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)