| Revision as of 04:19, 10 July 2006 editYanksox (talk | contribs)Rollbackers12,375 edits article survived AfD← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:41, 28 July 2006 edit undoJohnstonDJ (talk | contribs)334 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :As far as I know, that comment was refering to before I expanded and cleaned up the article. Either way, any way of improving the article sounds good to me. --] 10:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | :As far as I know, that comment was refering to before I expanded and cleaned up the article. Either way, any way of improving the article sounds good to me. --] 10:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Tags at beginning of article== | |||
| The tags at the beginning of the article state that the information is disputed, and uses excessive cliches and jargon. Their is no discussion on this matter on the talkpage, and I disagree with theses statements, and will remove them in roughly a week, if no reason is given for this here. Discuss. - ] 14:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Oh and I agree with not many articles linking here, so Ill do my best to add in articles like business emulation, etx, if it is relevant. but until then i think that tag should stay. - ] 14:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:41, 28 July 2006
 | This article was nominated for deletion on July 4th, 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep nomination withdrawn. |
This reads like an advert to me. (unsigned)
Agreed. That said, the information is sound and well-researched, though I might be inclined to bring up questions of notability. I'll take a look at revising it somewhat in the next few days, but other people's thoughts would be interesting. --Lawlore 00:11, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- As far as I know, that comment was refering to this version before I expanded and cleaned up the article. Either way, any way of improving the article sounds good to me. --Oakster 10:17, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Tags at beginning of article
The tags at the beginning of the article state that the information is disputed, and uses excessive cliches and jargon. Their is no discussion on this matter on the talkpage, and I disagree with theses statements, and will remove them in roughly a week, if no reason is given for this here. Discuss. - JohnstonDJ 14:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh and I agree with not many articles linking here, so Ill do my best to add in articles like business emulation, etx, if it is relevant. but until then i think that tag should stay. - JohnstonDJ 14:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)