Misplaced Pages

Computer worm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:47, 10 July 2006 edit63.85.72.242 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 04:08, 27 July 2006 edit undo24.29.131.222 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''computer worm''' is a self-replicating ] similar to a ]. A virus attaches itself to, and becomes part of, another executable program; however, a worm is self-contained and does not need to be part of another program to propagate itself. They are often designed to exploit the file ] capabilities found on many computers. The main difference between a ] and a worm is that a virus cannot propagate by itself whereas worms can. A worm uses a network to send copies of itself to other systems and it does so without any intervention. In general, worms harm the network and consume bandwidth, whereas viruses infect or corrupt files on a targeted computer. Viruses generally do not affect network performance, as their malicious activities are mostly confined within the target computer itself. A '''computer worm''' is a self-replicating ] similar to a ]. A virus attaches itself to, and becomes part of, another executable program; however, a worm is self-contained and does not need to be part of another program to propagate itself. They are often designed to exploit the file ] capabilities found on many computers. The main difference between a ] and a worm is that a virus cannot propagate by itself whereas worms can. A worm uses a network to send copies of itself to other systems and it does so without any intervention. In general, worms harm the network and consume bandwidth, whereas viruses infect or corrupt files on a targeted computer. Viruses generally do not affect network performance, as their malicious activities are mostly confined within the target computer itself.


The name 'worm' was taken from '']'', a ] novel published in 1975 by ]. Researchers (John F Shoch and John A Hupp chose the name in a paper published while they were working at ] ]; ''The Worm Programs'', Comm ACM, 25(3):172-180, 1982)) noted the similarities between their software and the fictional program described by Brunner. So they proposed the name, which has since been widely adopted. The name 'worm' was taken from '']'', a ] novel published in 1975 by ]. Researchers (John F Scoch and John A Hupp chose the name in a paper published while they were working at ] ]; ''The Worm Programs'', Comm ACM, 25(3):172-180, 1982)) noted the similarities between their software and the fictional program described by Brunner. So they proposed the name, which has since been widely adopted.
<!-- Who were they and what was the paper? -- see note just above--> <!-- Who were they and what was the paper? -- see note just above-->



Revision as of 04:08, 27 July 2006

A computer worm is a self-replicating computer program similar to a computer virus. A virus attaches itself to, and becomes part of, another executable program; however, a worm is self-contained and does not need to be part of another program to propagate itself. They are often designed to exploit the file transmission capabilities found on many computers. The main difference between a computer virus and a worm is that a virus cannot propagate by itself whereas worms can. A worm uses a network to send copies of itself to other systems and it does so without any intervention. In general, worms harm the network and consume bandwidth, whereas viruses infect or corrupt files on a targeted computer. Viruses generally do not affect network performance, as their malicious activities are mostly confined within the target computer itself.

The name 'worm' was taken from The Shockwave Rider, a science fiction novel published in 1975 by John Brunner. Researchers (John F Scoch and John A Hupp chose the name in a paper published while they were working at Xerox PARC; The Worm Programs, Comm ACM, 25(3):172-180, 1982)) noted the similarities between their software and the fictional program described by Brunner. So they proposed the name, which has since been widely adopted.

The first implementation of a worm was by these two researchers at Xerox PARC in 1978. Shoch and Hupp, originally designed the worm to find idle processors on the network and assign them tasks, sharing the processing load, and so improving the 'CPU cycle use efficiency' across an entire network. They were self-limited so that they would spread no farther than intended.

Though it was technically a trojan horse, the Christmas Tree Worm was likely the first worm on a worldwide network, spreading across both IBM's own international network and BITNET in December 1987, bringing both networks to their knees.

An early worm on the Internet, and the first to attract wide attention, was the Morris worm. It was also termed 'The Internet Worm' by Peter Denning in an article in American Scientist (March-April, 1988) in which he distinguished between a virus and a worm, thereby becoming an early computer zoologist. His definition was more restricted than that of some other computer zoologists of the time (McAfee and Haynes, Computer Viruses, Worms, Data Diddlers, ..., St Martin's Press, 1989). The Morris worm was written by Robert Tappan Morris, at the time a computer science graduate student at Cornell University, and released on November 2, 1988 using a friend's account on a MIT computer. It quickly infected large numbers of computers attached to the Internet and caused massive disruption. That it didn't spread even farther and cause more trouble is largely due to some errors in its implementation. It propagated via several bugs in BSD Unix and related systems, and its component programs (including several versions of 'sendmail'). Morris was indentified, confessed, and was later convicted under the US Computer Crime and Abuse Act. He received three years probation, 400 hours community service and a fine in excess of $10,000.

In addition to replication, a worm may be designed to do any number of things, such as delete files on a host system, encrypt files in a cryptoviral extortion attack, or send documents via e-mail. Some more recent worms have been multi-headed and carry other executables as a payload. However, even in the absence of such a payload, a worm can be damaging, if only from the network traffic generated by its reproduction. Mydoom, for example, caused a noticeable worldwide Internet slowdown at the peak of its spread.

A common payload for worms is a backdoor in the infected computer; Sobig and Mydoom are examples which created zombies. These zombie computers are used by spam senders for sending junk email or to cloak their website's address. Spammers are thought to be a source of funding for the creation of such worms , and worm writers have been caught selling lists of IP addresses of infected machines. Others try to blackmail companies with threatened DoS attacks.

Backdoors, however they may be installed, can be exploited by other malware, including worms. Examples include Doomjuice, which spreads using the backdoor opened by Mydoom, and at least one instance of malware taking advantage of the rootkit backdoor installed by the Sony/BMG DRM software they put on millions of music CDs ending in late 2005.

Whether worms can be useful is a common conundrum amongst theorists in computer science and artificial intelligence, beginning with the very first research into them at Xerox PARC. The Nachi family of worms, for example, tried to download then install patches from Microsoft's website to fix various vulnerabilities in the host system—the same vulnerabilities the Nachi worm intself exploited. This eventually made the systems affected more secure, but generated considerable network traffic (sometimes more than would have worms they were protecting against), rebooted the machine in the course of patching it, and, maybe most importantly, did its work without the explicit consent of the computer's owner or user. As such, most security experts regard worms as malware, whatever their payload or their writers' intentions.

Mitigation techniques

See also

External links

Template:Link FA

Category: