Revision as of 04:14, 26 October 2014 edit66.74.176.59 (talk) →Ethnocentric statement of "discovery" of gold: this just goes to show the inherent prejudice within the user name WP community toward those that remain with an IP. Get over it. Please keep your prejudicial views to yourself.← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:21, 26 October 2014 edit undoFamartin (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers57,684 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
PLEASE refrain from appearing prejudicial about my continued WP participant with an IP. Yes, I know about user names and do not have one. That is explanation far more than what the question is worth. Nothing against those that do have a user name. AGAIN -- PLEASE, refrain from appearing prejudicial especially by those that seem to take great pleasure toward those with which they disagree about WP content and attack the IP user for being identified as such.] (]) 14:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)] (]) 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | PLEASE refrain from appearing prejudicial about my continued WP participant with an IP. Yes, I know about user names and do not have one. That is explanation far more than what the question is worth. Nothing against those that do have a user name. AGAIN -- PLEASE, refrain from appearing prejudicial especially by those that seem to take great pleasure toward those with which they disagree about WP content and attack the IP user for being identified as such.] (]) 14:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)] (]) 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Can you blame me, or anyone, when 80% of vandalism on Misplaced Pages is from unregistered users, as stated here: | |||
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:IP_addresses_are_not_people ] (]) 04:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:21, 26 October 2014
Cities C‑class | |||||||
|
New Jersey C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Ethnocentric statement of "discovery" of gold
How can you discovery something the existence of which has already been established although those that proclaim it discovered were mistaken. Gold was found in California w/early explorers along Colorado River & near Mexican era Los Angeles in 1832 so existence of gold only confirmed not discovered in 1848 although the find was reason for the 1849 Rush, the latter the unique part of incident. To say that gold was discovered in California in 1848 is an ethnocentric statement as well as an example of ignorance by those that either do not want to acknowledge that gold had already been verified as being in California therefore it cannot be a discovery. Finding more gold is not a discovery but a re-confirmation of the existence of gold in the area.
If the description of the find as "discovery" is based on the text of "From Mexican Days to Gold Rush: Memoirs of...Who Grew Up with California" (Edited by Doyce B. Nunis, Jr by Marshall, James Wilson & Edward Gould Buffum]. "Marshall was born at Hopewell, NJ, went to California in 1845, participated in the 1846 Bear Flag Revolt, and discovered gold at Sutter's Mill in 1848.") all the more substantiate the ethnocentricity of the word "discovery" discounting the period of history and activities that occurred in California during its Mexican, Spanish and indigenous peoples periods. You cannot discovery that which already has been proven to exist; just confirm. Buffum et al were not aware of the history of California when they wrote their book so for them to describe it as a discovery is appropriate for their time but not in the spectrum of history. Just like Troy and Schliemann. We know better now than then. W rests with those facts that represent the long term not short-sighted ignorance.66.74.176.59 (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Fine. Whatever. Tired of arguing about it. You win. PS - Next time you want to make minor wording tweaks, don't make a soap box speech about it, just do it. Soap box speeches invoke knee-jerk reactions especially when they come form anonymous ip's. Oh, and get a regular username, for crying out out. Famartin (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
If your actions are based on knee jerk judgment then it might be best to understand the issue than detrimental to WP long range intent. as for the other statement, which I am not at all surprised, please read the following: == IP user identification ==
PLEASE refrain from appearing prejudicial about my continued WP participant with an IP. Yes, I know about user names and do not have one. That is explanation far more than what the question is worth. Nothing against those that do have a user name. AGAIN -- PLEASE, refrain from appearing prejudicial especially by those that seem to take great pleasure toward those with which they disagree about WP content and attack the IP user for being identified as such.66.74.176.59 (talk) 14:29, 19 September 2014 (UTC)66.74.176.59 (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Can you blame me, or anyone, when 80% of vandalism on Misplaced Pages is from unregistered users, as stated here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:IP_addresses_are_not_people Famartin (talk) 04:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories: