Misplaced Pages

User talk:EChastain: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:49, 26 October 2014 editEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,252 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:38, 26 October 2014 edit undoEChastain (talk | contribs)2,665 edits →arbcom: reNext edit →
Line 85: Line 85:
@] There are no ] in ] supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. ] (]) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC) @] There are no ] in ] supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. ] (]) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
:There are. Read ]. Also see ]. Attempting dispute resolution. ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 22:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC) :There are. Read ]. Also see ]. Attempting dispute resolution. ] ] <small>Please &#123;&#123;]&#125;&#125;</small> 22:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
@], I read ], and ] doesn't follow it. It doesn't have a lead that can stand alone and sums up the article: {{quote|"The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects. <br>The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.<ref>Do not violate ] by giving undue attention to less important controversies in the lead section.</ref> The notability of the article's subject is usually established in the first few sentences. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources. Apart from trivial basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article."}}
{{reflist}}
] (]) 23:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:38, 26 October 2014

Welcome

Hello, EChastain, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

arbcom

You are clearly editing in response to Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap_Task_Force. Please follow Misplaced Pages's guidelines and rules, specifically regarding WP:RS. You do not seem to be adhering to a neutral point of view. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

@User:EvergreenFir There are no reliable sources in Mansplaining supporting your claim that it's an academic concept. No reason for your revert. EChastain (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

There are. Read WP:LEAD. Also see Talk:Mansplaining#Meme. Attempting dispute resolution. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

@User:EvergreenFir, I read WP:LEAD, and Mansplaining doesn't follow it. It doesn't have a lead that can stand alone and sums up the article:

"The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects.
The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies. The notability of the article's subject is usually established in the first few sentences. The emphasis given to material in the lead should roughly reflect its importance to the topic, according to reliable, published sources. Apart from trivial basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article."

  1. Do not violate Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view by giving undue attention to less important controversies in the lead section.

EChastain (talk) 23:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)