| Revision as of 17:52, 28 October 2014 editPonyo (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators171,320 edits →28 October 2014: CU results← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:15, 28 October 2014 edit undoMike V (talk | contribs)28,285 edits closingNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| =====<big>28 October 2014</big>===== | =====<big>28 October 2014</big>===== | ||
| {{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} | ||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | ;Suspected sockpuppets | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
| *From a technical standpoint {{User|Omio Asad}} is {{unlikely}} to be a sock of {{U|Smauritius}}.--]<sup>]</sup> 17:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | *From a technical standpoint {{User|Omio Asad}} is {{unlikely}} to be a sock of {{U|Smauritius}}.--]<sup>]</sup> 17:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *I'm inclined to believe the accounts are different individuals. Omio Asad has added the birthdates to the same articles where Aradhya Rai (a confirmed sock) has been shown to remove the dates: Katrina Kaif ( ) Shraddha Kapoor ( ). Also I'm not sure if there's a consistent "preferred date" as a to March 3, 1989 and others to March 3 1988. ( ). Coupled with the checkuser data, I don't think the behavioral evidence is strong enough for a block. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 19:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ||
Revision as of 19:15, 28 October 2014
Smauritius
Smauritius (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Smauritius/Archive.
28 October 2014
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Omio Asad (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
All the same tells as last time, some of their first editys are to reinstate their prefered dob ] last sock and new one ] if you also look at the history is obssessed with models and specifically pictures and dates of birth which a vast majority of these edits on the new aqccount are doing. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 10:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- From a technical standpoint Omio Asad (talk · contribs) is
Unlikely to be a sock of Smauritius.--Jezebel's Ponyo 17:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to believe the accounts are different individuals. Omio Asad has added the birthdates to the same articles where Aradhya Rai (a confirmed sock) has been shown to remove the dates: Katrina Kaif (Omio Asad Aradhya Rai) Shraddha Kapoor (Omio Asad Aradhya Rai). Also I'm not sure if there's a consistent "preferred date" as a previous sock set it to March 3, 1989 and others to March 3 1988. (Mistyash OMGmelissa). Coupled with the checkuser data, I don't think the behavioral evidence is strong enough for a block. Mike V • Talk 19:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories: