Talk:Censorship: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:28, 1 November 2014 editCirt (talk \| contribs)199,086 edits →Notification of a TFA nomination: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:36, 2 November 2014 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Censorship/Archive 3) (botNext edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:
	{{Pornproject\|class=C\|importance=high}}		{{Pornproject\|class=C\|importance=high}}
	}}		}}

	== Music Censorship ==

	The music censorship section is problematic. The assertion that music censorship is almost always
	a human rights violation is an opinion form someone's random web page. (see cite) This assertion is not verifiable. ] (]) 18:45, 7 July 2013‎

	:The citation is from web site. It seems to be more than just "someone's random web page", but rather the web site for (from the About Freemuse page):
	:* a non-profit organisation registered in Denmark;
	:* an independent international organisation which advocates freedom of expression for musicians and composers worldwide;
	:* an organisation born of the 1st World Conference on Music and Censorship held in Copenhagen in November 1998;
	:* a membership organisation with its secretariat based in Copenhagen, Denmark;
	:* an organisation funded by The Swedish International development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), The Sigrid Rausing Trust, Roskilde Festival Charity Society, Björn Afzelius International Culture Foundation (BAIK), and Sweden’s Special Initiative for Democratisation and Freedom of Expression; and
	:* an organisation with Special Consultative Status with the United Nation‘s Economic and Social Council, ECOSOC, since 2012.
	:--] (]) 13:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

	== Censorship in some individual countries ==

	To the best of my knowledge, South Korea does not have pervasive censorship. However, they do filter adult material, North-Korean sympathetic results, and some YouTube videos from search engines catering to Korea. Please double-check this info and add to the map if it is correct. If it is, I think the map should be changed (South Korea goes into selective censorship)

	Also, I believe that Japan censors pornography. Again, please verify this information. (Japan is moved from no censorship to selective censorship).

	I believe the United Kingdom censors Pirate Bay. Yet again, please verify this info. (UK moved from no censorship to selective censorship).

	First talk page edit, please clean up if there are any mistakes and let me know. Thanks.
	] (]) 07:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

	:These comments all relate to the ], is that correct? The map is based on the material in the ] article. And the material in that article is in turn based on information in reports from ] and the ]. Misplaced Pages isn't rating the amount of censorship in individual countries itself, but rather summarizes the ratings that have been done by others. I believe that the map matches the article and the article matches its sources, but you should feel free to check that yourself and let us know if you find something that is out of wack. The category label used for the Japan and UK on the map is "Little or no censorship" rather than "no censorship" which at least opens the door to a small amount of Internet censorship in those and most other countries. Japan was a bit of a problem since it is not rated by the usual sources. There is a discussion about this at ]. And, finally, the ] article summarizes censorship issues beyond just Internet censorship. Hope this helps. --] (]) 14:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

	== Category for individuals who had their work censored? ==		== Category for individuals who had their work censored? ==

Revision as of 01:36, 2 November 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Censorship article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Freedom of speech High‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Top‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Journalism Top‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category for individuals who had their work censored?

I think we should create such category; sample person who should be in it: Wilhelm Reich. Thoughts? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Support, I think this is a great idea. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

@Cirt:. I have created said category, now at Category:People who had their work censored (syntax similar to Category:People who have walked on the Moon. Or should it be Category:Victims of censorship? We should redirect one into the other, probably. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thank you, sounds good. — Cirt (talk) 15:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Sadly, the category has been deleted (Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_April_15#Category:People_who_had_their_work_censored). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Editors may find the following useful: pl:Kategoria:Autorzy objęci zapisem cenzury w Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej - category for authors censored in People's Republic of Poland. I hope that one day English Misplaced Pages's consensus will change and we will categorize authors (and works) by place and date of censorship, too. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Internet Censorship By Country

Given the recent push requiring an "opt-out" to remove blocks on generally available content, shouldn't the United Kingdom be updated to show "selective censorship" or "changing situation"? --Connelly90 07:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

The Internet censorship by country map was recently updated following the release of a new Internet Enemies list by Reporters Without Borders. See Talk:Internet censorship by country#Enemies of the Internet 2014 for additional information. -Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 04:05, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Video Game Censorship

Seeing as there is an article on video game censorship, shouldn't it be given its own heading under "Censorship by medium"? --76.200.204.148 (talk) 14:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Done -Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a TFA nomination

In the past, there have been requests that discussions about potentially controversial TFAs are brought to the attention of more than just those who have WP:TFAR on their watchlist. With that in mind: Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties has been nominated for an appearance as Today's Featured Article. If you have any views, please comment at Misplaced Pages:Today's featured article/requests. — Cirt (talk) 20:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Categories: