Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Acquired-Sight.com: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:08, 11 July 2006 editRichfife (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,113 edits []: Delete← Previous edit Revision as of 21:11, 11 July 2006 edit undoJewbo WaIes, LOL (talk | contribs)30 editsm AbstainNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


*'''Delete''' - Not notable - ] 21:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - Not notable - ] 21:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
*'''Abstain'''. I abstain. --] 21:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:11, 11 July 2006

Acquired-Sight.com

Article on a small ISP that fails WP:CORP notability wise. Google hits for ""Acquired Sight" + ISP" = 71. No 3rd press mentions either. --  Netsnipe    17:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


To all,

I suppose this information doesn't warrant WP:CORP as much as it was going to cover the pioneering and business practices of Outdoor Wireless ISPs in 2001 using Acquired-Sight.com as an example.

Google hits a year or 2 ago would have provided more than enough chatter, however the business sold to a company who downsized it to be their 2nd income with existing customers.

Their decision basically gave the appearance of ASDC being defunct.

  • I will slow down the pace of updates to this article until it's determined that this article may stay. --thank you

~ ~ ~ ~ ASDC's entry author