| Revision as of 22:51, 11 July 2006 editYanksox (talk | contribs)Rollbackers12,375 edits Delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:55, 12 July 2006 edit undoRFerreira (talk | contribs)Rollbackers6,511 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom--] 20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom--] 20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to ]. ]] 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to ]. ]] 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''', subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. ] 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:55, 12 July 2006
Jackie Crockett
nn wrestling cameraman, only claim of noteability is relations to promoters Burgwerworldz 20:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - being related to a notable does not automatically make a person notable. - Che Nuevara: 22:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- Smerge to the relatives, usual story. Stifle (talk) 14:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom--Nick Y. 20:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete being related to someone that is considered notable does not merit inculsion according to WP:BIO. Yanksox 22:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, subjects are not usually notable by relation unless they are part of a royal/presidential family. RFerreira 22:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)